Why did Maloney spurn the Hampstead SRA hoax?

It seems to be the nature of the Hampstead SRA hoax that one can retread the same well-covered ground many times, and yet each time discover new bits and pieces which help us make sense of how and why this hoax was perpetrated.

For example, a few days ago one of our alert readers noticed this comment from our old friend Araya Soma (aka Araya Manna aka Laurence Lavie) on one of Brian Harvey’s YouTube videosMaloney-Araya 2018-08-14

…when the mother and step dad Abraham from hampstead (sic) case asked me for help 6 months before case came into the media (Abraham is the ex of my best friend) I tried to reach out to bill (sic) as heard he would be able to help, but it was all to be kept hush hush, as court case had not happened yet, he never got back to me and none of his so called admins wanted to help either, they wanted names which I could not give as court case had not happened yet as I said. All I wanted is to know what route to take who to talk to and make sure it comes to light the right way, not a dicky bird. 

This matches up with Facebook posts from Araya, dated November 2014—months before the hoax went viral in early February 2015:

Araya-re Maloney 2016-03-27Araya-re Maloney 3 2016-03-27Araya re Maloney 2-2016-03-27Araya-Maloney-4 2016-03-27

This bears out our belief that not only was the hoax planned well in advance, but various people with contacts in the UK conspiracy community were recruited and tasked with helping publicise the case once the legal case was finished, to “make sure it came to light the right way”.

In other words, the goal was to seize control of the narrative well ahead of time. To do that, those who planned the hoax needed accomplices, and Bill Maloney seemed like a good candidate.

Where did Maloney go?

It’s interesting to us that Bill Maloney, who is known for his aggressively vocal support of allegations of sexual abuse against a wide variety of folk, seemed suddenly shy about supporting the Hampstead hoax.

Only a few days after Abe, Ella, and the children arrived back in London, Ella sent an email to Brian Gerrish, clearly outlining all the salacious details which he could hope to offer his listeners. As we’ve previously stated, this email was a follow-up to a meeting they’d held in person with Gerrish; he had also sent Finn Hagan to interview the children more fully prior to the email being sent.

However, when Gerrish received the email, he sent it to Bill Maloney for a look-see.

This is where things get complicated. As we pointed out a few days ago, Maloney would have immediately recognised the allegations that each of the “cult members” sported monster or devil tattoos in intimate places. This was the very allegation which he had concocted against Leon Brittan only months earlier, and he was well aware that it was not true. (Ironically, Abe had inserted the tattoo detail to demonstrate that the Hampstead hoax was true.)

We can’t say what must have gone through Maloney’s mind, but it seems likely that he would have known that if he became involved in promoting the hoax (and he knew it was a hoax—the lie, after all, was his own!) the police would immediately know where the unusual “tattoo” allegation had originated, and he’d be in trouble up to his neck.

We do know, however, what his next actions were:

  1. He forwarded the Gerrish email to his friend Jonathan Wedger, who was then still employed as a police officer;
  2. He made himself unavailable to Araya, and refused to get involved with the hoax.

As to why he sent the email to Wedger, again, we can only speculate. We can think of at least one reason: Maloney wanted clear of this thing, which bore his fingerprints even though he hadn’t created it.

Sending it to his friend the police officer would show that he had “done the right thing” and reported it to police, rather than using it for his own ends. Ironically, this is similar to the tactic taken by Abraham, who immediately took the children to visit his brother-in-law the Special Constable, so he could claim to have “reported it to police”.

For Wedger, who does seem to be a true believer in SRA, the email would have been both horrifying and exciting: according to his own statements, he had lost credibility among his colleagues and superior officers, and had at least once been ordered to take the summer off, in hopes that the rest would clear his head.

So he forwarded the email to his colleague PC Paul Armstrong, but used his personal email address—’numnut2009@xxx’. We don’t know whether Wedger was already on sick leave at this time, but it seems likely, as otherwise he would probably have used his work email.

Paul Armstrong’s response is recorded in the police CRIS document for the case. He sent the following email to Anne Bewley at the Met’s Directorate of Professional Standards: CRIS Armstrong 2018-08-14PC Armstrong sounds distinctly upset by the contents of the email, and clearly took it quite seriously. This could have been why Wedger chose to send it to him in the first place: he’d want to send it to someone who was likely to believe the story.

From there, the email made its way to the desk of DC Steve Martin, who could not have helped but notice that it was identical—to the word—to an email which Ella had sent him two weeks previously. As we’ve said before, it was Wedger who drove one of the final nails into the Hampstead SRA hoax’s coffin.

Ironically, in attempting to rid himself of the Hampstead case, Maloney inadvertently ensured that his name would be linked to it forever. Bill Maloney and Jonathan Wedger

166 thoughts on “Why did Maloney spurn the Hampstead SRA hoax?

  1. Very disturbing E.C., especially since this is the classic definition of a conspiracy (not the illuminutti or whatever), but a group of people conspiring to commit a crime- and a rather odious one at that ie framing innocent people by accusing them of committing crimes they had not done…. purely for personal gain

    And that they are (mostly) still out and about and still doing it???

    Words fail me…

    Liked by 4 people

  2. Extraordinary work. Delving deeply into this charade reveals so much detail as the plot and hoax is unpicked. The cast of characters are simply bizarre- some fanatics, others as cunning as the proverbial sewer rat.
    The crime of a conspiracy to pervert the course of justice is very real and all the indicators are there. Unfortunately, it’s one of the most difficult crimes to prosecute as with the bunch of people involved it’s hard to tell who knows there is a hoax and who genuinely believes that there is a Hampstead cult of baby killers.

    But the worst aspect is: innocent people become victims to this mendacious mob.

    Liked by 4 people

  3. Steved above comes almost to the exact same conclusion as me and should be congratulated for his sheer brilliance!.
    I’m wondering if Jon Wedger has been advised or even realized himself as a former cop that he has been sailing very close to the wind. I know for a fact that both Baloney and the odious Fay were hauled in for questioning over the infamous ‘Nick’ matter which has finally terrified Fay who has gone to ground. I assume both have been told there will be no action which is probably why Bumptious Baloney has burst back onto the scene, He’s still an accident waiting to happen.

    Liked by 3 people

  4. Brilliant EC! I was just looking at the video of ‘Sheriff’ Sands (hilarious) being arrested & her time outside the Church & couldn’t see Maloney in it, I forgot he hadn’t been involved in it, when really, it was right up his street. Credibility@zero with this & Brian Harvey.

    He seems to have a fascination with tattoos in the groin area, perhaps he has one there, but hey, each to their own. *Ouch*

    Liked by 3 people

  5. Thanks, Peg! I thought I remembered Maloney from the church videos too, but I think I was thinking about the 2015 CSA march, where he stood at Trafalgar Square and bellowed at passers-by.

    Liked by 2 people

  6. SMH again. I’ve said it before. But I saw it straight away as a planned hoax and did ring the police to try and get them to help prevent it from becoming viral, as I knew it would be, based on how they all operated in their holliehoax heydays…….. I hope it is provable and maybe wrongly, believe that it can be, just because of the amount of computers that have been seized, which must contain the evidence, surely ?

    Liked by 3 people

  7. Anti CSA …. tho because unbeknownst to Lee Jesson, who actually organised it, the main films were made and released by Belindas favourite film maker; Martin Houston………. it was presented in the wrong way, not as intended. One of my starkest memories is Brenda McNamara mocking Cliff Richard, with ‘Here Kitty, Kitty’, over and over again…………… I hope she is called to account. I heard tonight about her taking lots of cruiseship holidays over the years that she was supposedly raising money for CSA victims and survivors….. She seemed to go quiet for a time, until Bill came out with Jon Wedger recently, they obviously thought they could repeat their past performances, sickened isn’t the word.

    Liked by 5 people

  8. When even Super Dingbats like Spivey and La Verite didn’t want any truck with this garbage then it was obviously bullshite that even esteemed “investigative journalists ” such as them could see through.

    Liked by 2 people

  9. The raising of funds and donations is a scandal in itself that needs investigating. We saw Bellender come a cropper over her efforts when a pal was on the lam.
    There are several charities that provide aid for real victims (although I have an issue with some like the NSPCC which is top heavy with highly paid staff) and compensation can be granted even without someone being convicted.

    But all these minnows plucking away at people’s heartstrings and without mentioning any names (although Angela Power-Disney comes to mind) begging for cash and donations to merely repeat and re-package internet rumor is a disgrace.
    Most of them are topping up their social security payments & doubtful any of it’s declared. Is it a ruse to avoid telling the taxman about undeclared income?. Same goes for those on workplace pensions.

    Mr. Wedger’s cycle ride is something people often plan and save for as a holiday. Why not raise funds as a “victim advocate” and finance your holiday that way?.
    Not saying any of them have breached the law as yet but this could be seen as a minor fraud. Similar to how phony cancer “victims” have been recently caught out.

    Liked by 3 people

  10. I’ve yet to see proof of him sitting on that bike, let alone riding it ! But given that he bragged about so many people recognising him along that long road and waving and shouting out to him ……. There must be so many photos, from his fans, I just mustn’t have seen any 🙂

    Liked by 3 people

  11. “This bears out our belief that not only was the hoax planned well in advance, but various people with contacts in the UK conspiracy community were recruited and tasked with helping publicise the case once the legal case was finished, to ‘make sure it came to light the right way’.”

    …So after key contacts such as Gerrish and Maloney declined to help them, it was an amazing stroke of luck that Ella and Sabine accidentally sent all the videos and the suspects’ names and addresses to Henry Curteis at Tapnewswire.

    Liked by 4 people

  12. Good point, Sam. Yes, perverting the course of justice would be hard to prove, sadly, though it’s clear that that’s what was (allegedly) going on.

    By the way, I see you got an honourable mention in Arfur’s latest video 😀

    Liked by 2 people

  13. “Steved above comes almost to the exact same conclusion as me and should be congratulated for his sheer brilliance!”

    Aha! Well you know what I’m gonna ask, then…

    Liked by 2 people

  14. Sheva, it’s funny you mention Mumsy, as I see she’s been getting very cosy with Wedgie on Facebook:


    ……………………………………………………………………………………………..


    ……………………………………………………………………………………………..
    By the way I’m quite concerned about the sudden disappearance of the other 139 Scilly Isles. If anyone knows what’s happened to them could they let me know?

    Liked by 3 people

  15. Thanks, OP

    To this day I can’t remember why I sped that up, though I do recall people saying they preferred DLV’s ‘helium voice’ to her normal one 😀

    Liked by 3 people

  16. A few years ago now, Brenda gave money to Chris Wittwer, before they fell out apparently. She also said she gave £800 to Ben Fellows for his jolly to India, but she got upset when she didn’t know who his new girlfriend was.

    Liked by 3 people

  17. How do you know Baloney spurned it. How do you know he wasn’t involved behind the scenes. All these people Maloney Everard Kev Baker with the fake beard on the video “Steer clear of the truther industrial complex” are connected with each other. They manipulate the weak minded followers to wreak havoc and destroy credible investigations the way David Icke has been doing for years. Hampstead is wealthy neighbourhood and how come none of the teachers or people accused have taken any of these people accusing them of being abusers to court for libel? By publicly making ridiculous accusations about people being investigated like Leon Brittan etc it destroys any chance of an unbiased trial should evidence be found and enables the guilty to walk free. I’m not saying Brittan was guilty of anything but he was being investigated. It’s obvious Baloney and Everard and Baker and McKenzie etc are all working together in this and these are the people with the most social media etc followers. They get close to the victims and the victims family and close friends more than likely fit them up and grass them up.

    Like

  18. and whats more odd is they know Abraham Christie is a child abuser and drug dealer, cannabis smoking loon and still support him. They know Everard is a fraudster and a nonce and still support him too. Who knows who these people are really working for 🙂

    Like

  19. Well said “innocent people become victims to this mendacious mob.” Considering the accusation made publicly against teachers parents and the school i’m surprised none of them have been sued for libel or have had mysterious accidents by now.

    Like

  20. Brian Harvey has called them all out for what they are. Hence Kev Baker wearing a fake beard doing damage limitation in the Truther Industrial Complex video poste don this blog. Really, I am amazed this blog got fooled by Baker wearing shades and false beard.

    Obsession with tattoos probably cooked up by this group of shills Baloney, Baker, Everfraud knowing that there is no way any of the accused would drop their pants by playing these sickos game. The more outrageous the lie or accusation the more naive people believe it. It’s shocking , they have Tattoos. The children said so, therefore it proves abuse by the school.

    The whole thing was cooked up to discredit all the made public investigations into abuse by public figures living and dead.

    Meanwhile Baloney Maloney and Everfraud and Baker say nothing about Rochdale, Rotherham, Oxford etc and the cover up by the Labour party and politicians that went on for years.

    Liked by 1 person

  21. “Someone posting on youtube again that you are dissing me lol?? Strong reason to believe bla bla?”

    As if, Angie. Perish the thought!

    Oh wait – this is from the post directly below hers:

    JournoAngie – worth every penny

    Liked by 2 people

  22. “Im not neither the messenger or video uploader.”

    Yeah and you’re not exactly Oscar bloody Wilde either, are you?

    Liked by 3 people

  23. Whoever thought the end of the world would be announced from a middle-class northern Sydney suburb?. I think really this is a cry for help from Arthur and he really just wants visitors.

    Liked by 2 people

  24. Shurley Shome Mishtake. Gays are very welcome in Heaven under The Arches at Charing Cross Station. I think there’s a cover charge of £10 but I don’t think they hold bachelor parties.

    Liked by 2 people

  25. Always worth perusing the Facebook / Twitter pages of these people to gauge where they are coming from
    For example: Brenda McNamara is clearly committing a crime ( I’ve reported it) by publishing the name, location details and photo of an offender involved in one of Britain’s most notorious crimes but who nonetheless was granted lifetime anonymity.
    I’m not going to dwell on the morality of the dreadful crime but the law is the law and this offense can carry a 2-year jail sentence and people have already been convicted for doing exactly the same.

    Liked by 4 people

  26. It’s far, far worse than I thought. Following the links from McNamara’a page to a “friend” named Leanne Taylor reveals a woman who says she will continue posting the above details (illegally) and her post has been shared 2000 times.
    She states no matter who many times Facebook removes her post she will keep uploading it.
    These people have no respect for the law.
    She needs an early knock on the door from police.

    Liked by 4 people

  27. There is also another fine bar around the corner in Duncannon Street called “Halfway to Heaven”. A gay friend of mine was visiting London and suggested that we meet there for a few drinks. I arrived 30 minutes before him…

    Liked by 1 person

  28. Whilst it is true that Alex Jones has a worldwide reputation as a loathsome toad, his actual business is selling fake supplements such as “Survival Shield X2” (a relabeled bottle of iodine), “Anthroplex” (a zinc supplement with hardly any zinc in it) and “Brain Force” (which clearly hasn’t worked on Mr Jones.or his British conspiratards Milo and Paul Joseph Watson).

    I submit that HoplessGirl and he have much in common preying on others’ stupidity. Her praise for a fellow snake oil sales person is therefore not that surprising .

    Liked by 4 people

  29. “I’ll make them chomp on the crusty dangle berries hanging off your ass hole hairs in your ass crack. Love you.”

    Not the best chat-up line I’ve ever heard, if I’m honest.

    Liked by 3 people

  30. Has Angie visited Australia? Arthur seems to have very detailed knowledge of her person.

    I have to say, when your friends come up with images like that, who needs enemas … I mean enemies.

    Liked by 4 people

  31. And in this one (also deleted) she’s threatening to have me killed in the outback (she still inexplicably thinks I’m Australian):

    Liked by 1 person

  32. This whole Wedger thing sounds very Ben Fellows to me, first of all he claims he went all the way to Cornwall on a bicycle, then he says he’s swimming round the Isles of Scilly, think about it people, how is that at all possible?

    Liked by 2 people

  33. Has anyone seriously used the photograph of Angie and her sisters with Savile to suggest that she is a peadophile? I think it, and the various posts Angie made in the past praising Savile, has been used to cast doubt on her more recent claims to have been abused by the man. It is only troofer logic that says that anyone pictured with Jimmy Savile was either a peadophile or a victim.

    Liked by 2 people

  34. “Had mysterious accidents”? That seems to imply that the falsely accused in this hoax would resort to physical violence. In fact, we have been following this case since about three months after it began, and have only ever seen the people of Hampstead rely on assistance from the police to end this thing. I’m quite sure none of them would endorse the use of violence.

    Liked by 2 people

  35. That’s right. As FS says, our issue was her (typical) back-pedalling and saying he’d tried to grope her and that she’d found him disgusting, when she’d actually spoken very fondly of him and the meeting before the child abuse Revelations about him came out.

    Liked by 1 person

  36. Taking people to court for libel is out of reach of most private citizens. Even if you win your case the chances of seeing any money is small unless you are suing a corporation. Most of the people making these stupid accusations have fuck all anyway.

    Liked by 3 people

  37. Oh well, at least Andy’s having a good day:


    ………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

    ………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

    Liked by 1 person

  38. Oh and apparently the ’60 Minutes’ hoax, which has been extensively covered and ridiculed on here, is gonna “hurt us deep”. Good luck with that, lads 😀

    Liked by 1 person

  39. I’m starting to think Andy’s glory days are behind him. The poor bugger even struggles to do a Nazi salute these days:

    Liked by 1 person

  40. Errr, has it occurred to these two these fully signed up members of the Not Just Barking But Halfway to Upminister Club that in fact RD basically won a court case about the Hampstead hoax, the entire fiasco was deemed a con job and the esteemed Judge in the UK High Court roundly condemned those who promote it and post videos of the two kids on Youtube?.
    Gawd help DC Grimwood.

    Liked by 3 people

  41. For anyone who fancies listening to Desperate Devine droning on about Hampstead, Hoaxtead, common law, the ’60 Minutes of Shite’ show and Gawd knows what else for an hour and a half:

    Liked by 1 person

  42. The 60 Minute fiasco has been roundly condemned and it’s ‘sources’ who were Exaro and former MP John Hemming accuser have been completely discredited.
    One ludicrous claim was from a chauffeur from Australia House who said he regularly transported children to “abuse parties” in the embassy’s official Rolls Royce. Sadly for him, their office revealed he was never employed by them but did fill in for the regular driver who was off sick for 3 days only- the length of his entire employment.

    Liked by 3 people

  43. John has “Crown protection”?

    I thought they were all satantic, pedo, baby munching lizards.

    Join the dots people, join the dots.

    Liked by 2 people

  44. I see that they’re pushing that old episode, the old one with “Teresa/Natalie”, who I think was really called Samantha. The girl who later admitted she’d lied.

    Liked by 2 people

  45. So in the middle of sharing someone’s traumatic back story, Angie the ‘professional journalist’, fucks off to get a lighter.

    Keep those donations rolling in, folks!

    Liked by 3 people

  46. She’s “had some anons do some deep research into Hoaxtead Research”…but she STILL says we’re a “government-run GCHQ operation”. Go figure 😂

    Liked by 3 people

  47. The nasty pair of shits are going after Steve and Sheva again.

    Still, its fun to watch Angie struggling to know what to do because Heather apparently can’t be arsed to turn up .

    Liked by 3 people

  48. This is really nasty and I’ve messaged Sheva, Kilrush and Steve to ask whether they’re happy for it to stay up, especially as the arseholes are attacking Steve’s wife again. I’ve also suggested they report it, as I’ve done too. Specifically I’ve reported the gangland death threat made to Steve and his wife at 14:26 😦

    Liked by 3 people

  49. Heather admits to stalking Steve and his wife where they live and work.

    This whole video is basically confession of serious criminal activity and I think Steve would be within his rights to report it to the police.

    Liked by 3 people

  50. So the “deep researchers” (i.e. Heather) have concluded that Ghost of Sam, Grobnob, EC and I are all Steve. LOL

    And Steve and his wife are running a dog-trafficking ring?

    Seriously, if anyone spots anyone spots anything in this video that true,can you let me know?

    Liked by 2 people

  51. “Hoaxtead is run by Steve Keys. They’re adamant. They’ve done a research.” 😂

    What happened to “It’s been forensically proven that it’s run by Ricky Dearman” and “It’s been forensically proven that it’s run by Sheva Burton”? LOL

    Liked by 3 people

  52. When the fuck did we claim to have broken Angela’s leg through curses? No, seriously – she really says that!

    Liked by 3 people

  53. And now they’re accusing Steve’s wife of stealing Heather’s identity and they’re threatening to report her to the police for identity theft.

    Sorry but have we entered some parallel universe here? What the fuck is going on?

    Liked by 3 people

  54. “We’re just two little old ladies. What’s your problem?”

    That’s it – I’ve officially heard it all now.

    Liked by 2 people

  55. Lets put it this way. Accusing parents and teachers publicly of being paedophiles and whipping up a frenzy online certainly has put parents and teachers and the school in danger from vigilantes and other such types. The main instigaters being Everard, McKenzie, Kev baker etc who have large social media followings.

    I agree about not endorsing violence but we live in the real world and these idiots like Everard etc target people calling them paedos without realising the possible consequenses. They are not nice people and Everard has certainly threated people with violence himself. What people have seen from this mob is just the tip of the iceberg as to their real caracters.

    I hope they all get prosecuted and serve time but doubt they will, the main players that is.

    Liked by 2 people

  56. Yes in the video posted on this blog.

    It’s Kev Baker with a fake beard and looks like hairpiece. He is a very bad actor.

    Brian Harvey is exposing Maloney for the con man he is and also others involved with phoney baloney.. These so called twoof campaigners are all connected and Baker is targeting Brian Harvey as damage limitation as Harvey is gaining momentum and exposing them.

    Like

  57. I mistakenly believed people who live in NW3 are wealthy.

    Winning the case shouldn’t be about money but about putting a stop to these liars.

    Whats interesting is that I wouldn’t be surprised if the main players have their own dirty secrets. Everard has been exposed as a paedo with evidence and is riding that one out. He laundered over 80K he obtained byfraud via a UK bank while living in France.

    Liked by 1 person

  58. So in effect they are similar to people who offer to fix a roof tile who knock on pensioners doors and then march the old pensioner down to the bank to withdraw their life savings.

    A group of sociopathic parasites who find victims they can manipulate in their so called campaigns putting words into victims mouths working together to gain publicity and donations and using and abusing the victims till they are no further use to them then moving on to the next one.

    On the bright side none of them look very healthy.

    Liked by 2 people

  59. The funny thing about the “hand identification” lady is that I watched a talk by her, and she is a serious academic. The technique has to do with matching the unique vein patterns in child sex abuse videos and images with those on suspects, but the media has picked it up as a novelty.

    Like

  60. Yes, it’s easy to believe that everyone in that area of London is wealthy, but keep in mind that not all of the children actually live in the area, and that the school is linked to the C of E and is a “pay or pray” one, which draws Christ Church parishioners who might otherwise not be able to pay their kids’ tuition.

    Liked by 1 person

  61. I kept all those messages between me and my wife. There were simply despicable. I won’t go into most of what was said.

    I have my opinion on this case. I comment online as Postnein. Christ, there is even a Discogs page with my mug on. Im me, i made sure i used my real name online since the first video, trying to pull someone else into her BS. My name they said was an anagram, they then start talking about some solicitor (realistically, i should have kept that name and found a way to inform this solicitor he was being harassed)

    I don’t mind all this bullshit on me (although i’d rather i didn’t have to deal with it) but bringing my wife into the mix is plain fucked. Heather messaged her out of the blue, straight in calling her a child trafficker. As mentioned in the video, it got worse than that.

    My wife didn’t want to give Heather the personal satisfaction of blocking her, so continued to give back. I did say it would be best simply to block. Does my wife deserve this, not a fucking chance. To say some two “dot joining” work their way around their so called conspiracy (for all they are making claims about) is nothing short but a total mess. Its like the end of a game Chinese Whispers.

    My wife has issues working out the tv remote let alone using a laptop (to which she doesn’t own one) My wife has never commented about Hampstead, not once. She is family orientated and leads a simple life, we both do.

    If these people wanted to ask questions about my parents business, at one stage i would have happily answered their questions. There is nothing to hide, its an establishment run by two grafters, both in their 60’s. Opening 6 days a week. Winning an award this month as part of a project that has shown how the business has made the area safer for people. I haven’t bothered them with the attack from these two as its just not something anyone would want to deal with.

    I don’t know what it is the two of them are trying to achieve, but targeting a business because i have commented on Hoaxtead, inventing an impossible scenario is desperate and sickening. One of these people claiming to be a christian of sorts. My wife is a deeply spiritual person (often making little notes and prayers for angels) i would never in a million years act in the manner of this so called Christian. Never.

    I know Heather will be reading this. I don’t know your personal story, but your obviously damaged. Im not one to wish bad on people. No one.

    The way you conduct yourself online is disgusting, it simply shows you up to be nothing but a vile person, who bullies people she believes she can get away with bullying. I would advice you get help, but fear your beyond that. As anyone who has had her contact you, im sure will agree.

    Liked by 4 people

  62. Mental stuff:
    “Detective Chief Inspector Colin Larkin, who investigated the rape, told the BBC for the documentary: “It was brilliant. It had gone beyond my expectations. She had proven beyond all reasonable doubt that he was guilty.”

    Why don’t they cut to the chase and employ Mrs. Eva Petulengo “Clairvoyant to The Stars” on Brighton Pier as I hear she is a brilliant Palm Reader.

    Like

  63. C’mon Ghost of Sam, Lakemba is a suburb in the South West of Sydney, a bloody long way from the affluent northern suburbs. The Lebanese Looney has probably never been north of the Coathanger!

    Like

  64. My mistake, Yes Kev Baker is older. It was the big sunglasses and accent that got me.

    The guy in the video does have a beard Liza.

    Like

  65. what is wrong with these f****** people. They do sat nothing about the hundreds of white girls raped by mainly Pakistani gangs in Rochdale Rotherham etc who are targeting these girls because of their race forcing them to take drugs and alchohol, pimping them out, torturing some and even murdering some and has been covered up for years by politicians councillors and police and instead go on a witch hunt looking for imaginary witches.

    If I was a cynic I would say that the whole Hoaxtead and other stuff was designed to distract from the scandal and systematic rape going on by mainly Pakistanis in UK who even Maajid Nawaz says is disproportionate.

    https://www.lbc.co.uk/radio/presenters/maajid-nawaz/sarah-champion-is-right-maajid-nawaz/

    The whole thing looks like a distraction to the real things going on. The main players get together and form their team, McKenzie, Baloney, Baker, Everard work out a plan of action and recruit underlings who post on social media and attract very naive people and everybody’s attention is directed towards imaginary crimes by imaginary criminals. Still on the positive side is that these hoaxers have not said anything which is non PC.

    There have been allegations by one or two that Chris Everard is involved with Rogue mi5 agents.

    ( I wont be surprised if my comment gets deleted completely because of the line above. )

    It’s clear that people who make up this stuff saying things about flat earth etc are in reality just harmless con merchants and stringing people along for donations and subs and T shirts etc.

    But people who publicly call others paedophiles and name them publicly as they did with the Hoaxtead childrens father and teachers working at the school they named must know they are playing with fire in as much as they are making enemies for themselves by accusing innocent people of the worst type of crimes. It’s a different game all together and now one really knows how the victims these vile hoaxers will react in the short or long term.

    Which gives some people the impression that the main players are somehow protected.

    Like

  66. Thanks for that bit of information, it explains why the hoaxers targeted that particular school. They chose a school in Hampstead I think for publicity as Hampstead is a very well known part of London where many celebrities live. Victorian Hampstead had it’s fair share of eccentric artists painters writers and thespians who dabbled in the occult. They chose a school which does not have wealthy parents with the resources to sue and set private detectives after the hoaxers.

    Liked by 1 person

  67. Funny how I replied to a comment where someone mentioned “Deb C” a victim of fraudster Everard and see that for same reason my comment is awaiting moderation before being allowed on this thread. Noticed about the allegations that Everard is involved with rogue mi5 agents gets deleted to. Belinda Mckenzie systems analyst, is that another name for spook?

    See if this gets deleted.

    Like

  68. “They do sat [sic] nothing about the hundreds of white girls raped by mainly Pakistani gangs in Rochdale”

    Actually, they never shut up about it; and they use it as an excuse to demonise Pakistanis and Muslims as a whole. They’ve also made Tommy Robinson a cause célèbre despite the fact that he’s a racist prick.

    Like

  69. “…systematic rape going on by mainly Pakistanis in UK”

    Do you have some stats and sources to substantiate your claim that the majority of rape in the UK is committed by Pakistanis, EoE?

    Incidentally, Pakistanis represent 1.86% of the UK population.
    (Source: 2011 census)

    Like

  70. “If I was a cynic I would say that the whole Hoaxtead and other stuff was designed to distract..”

    If you were a cynic? I’m thinking you are, judging by some of the comments you’ve made. So you think it was some kind of PsyOp? You’re in the Guidance2222 camp then, EastofEden.

    Liked by 1 person

  71. Just after the Ben Fellows trial verdict, Maloney spoke with Lou Collins on her radio show. He mentioned then that there was some sort of injunction against him (and Chris Fay too I think), which they hoped to have resolved within a few months.
    Maloney then pretty much disappeared from the radar for a long time, only surfacing again this year I think, Shirely Oaks shenanigans aside.
    This may be why he didn’t jump on the Hampstead stuff at the time.

    Like

  72. Pingback: Back to FAQs: Tattoo update includes new info | HOAXTEAD RESEARCH

  73. Pingback: Updating the FAQ: What about the tattoos? | HOAXTEAD RESEARCH

Comments are closed.