As we’ve mentioned here before, our email in-box is a never-ending source of things which make us go “hmm”. Or occasionally, as happened yesterday, things which make us go “what the actual everlasting fuck?”
In fact, that might have been a bit of an under-reaction. For the email we received—forwarded by a friend of the blog—contains so much what-the-fuckery that we were really at a bit of a loss for words.
Yes, that does happen from time to time. But we got over it.
Here’s the email:
First of all, yes, it’s from Charlotte Ward, and addressed to Brian Gerrish.
She seems to be repudiating her role in the Hampstead SRA hoax, which backs up a strange notice which was floating around the internet a week and a half ago:
At the time, we wondered what this was all about. If yesterday’s email is anything to go by, it seems that Charlotte/Jacqui believes that Belinda McKenzie has set her “Hampstead psy op attack dogs” on her and Jacco De Boer:
Last week, I requested loudly that Belinda call off the Hampstead psy op attack dogs. I stated that I would walk away from everything to do with “conspiracy theory” if our harassment stopped. I requested we were left alone: we are asylum seekers from the UK government, having been framed by your cronies as patsies for the Hampstead psy op (as soon as we realised what was happening, we applied here for asylum – fortunately I had the UK Certificate of Good Behaviour used for my visa). I stressed that if the dogs were called off, I would not take any action, including on social media in this country – which I never have and would not do unless absolutely necessary.
Apparently Angela Power-Disney tipped Charlotte off that she should watch the UK Column Friday broadcast for some sort of answer to her request. She did, and took “David Scott’s cursory mention of the Hampstead trolling to be a sign that the dogs were going to be called off – and, indeed they were. For a few days”.
Because it makes perfect sense to watch fourth-rate online news-reader cosplay videos to glean portents about imaginary “attack dogs”.
Framed by Gerrish’s cronies?
We’re interested to hear that Charlotte now feels that she was “framed by [Gerrish’s] cronies as patsies for the Hampstead psy op”, a claim she reiterates further down in the email. She now claims she was “entrapped” into leaking the names of the victims of the Hampstead hoax, a claim which seems very odd to us considering the venom with which she pursued innocent people during the reign of her blog in 2015.
At that time, you might recall, she published this threat to a parent who had written to her asking her to stop the unceasing harassment:
Yet now, Charlotte is positing herself as a victim of the perpetrators of the very hoax she helped set in motion. Is she saying that she didn’t know what was happening? Or that Belinda had some hold on her which compelled her to act as she did? Enquiring minds want to know.
Charlotte claims that Belinda’s “attack dogs” are messing with her computer, and mucking about with her ability to trade in Bitcoin (at least, we think that’s what she’s saying here):
As I write, there are spies in my computer again. They are now in it every day and all night, changing shift around 5pm (so they are in our time zone, possibly in the US Embassy, Paramaribo) and interfering with my attempts to type. This is particularly aggravating while I am playing the Hi Lo game on the Bitcoin faucet.
It does occur to us that if Charlotte’s computer is going wonky at around 5 p.m. local time, it could very well be that that’s when the internet busies up and gets sluggish and wonky, particularly in a country like Suriname, where wifi might not be as reliable as in some places. Just a thought.
Charlotte also mentions someone named Elana Freeland, a blogger who’s interested in chemtrails and other such nonsense. Why Charlotte would claim that this person is an Illuminati double agent, or that she would be ordering someone in Montreal to be tortured, we really could not say.
Charlotte makes a threat
It really wouldn’t be a Charlotte email without at least one threat, and she doesn’t disappoint here:
As we are not being allowed to walk away free, having done nothing illegal (except possibly under the marijuana laws in this country – although a Senior Civil Servant here was quite happy to use our oil, having been referred by a doctor), Jacqui Farmer and Video Man are planning what will be an extremely interesting video to be distributed on multiple platforms with Dutch subtitles about their experience of having been set up as patsies ref Nigel Cooper and the Hampstead psy op. We will be aiming it, also, at members of the Hampstead community who may have suffered any distress as a result of Charlotte having been entrapped into leaking the names by a friend of Elana Freeland.
So basically, if Charlotte’s computers don’t stop acting up, she and Jacco are going to make a very damning video about how they were set up as patsies for the Hampstead psy op.
That should be very interesting indeed: we have long been very interested to know how and why Charlotte was recruited, though we do have some of the bare bones of the story down.
We must say that we nearly fell off our chairs at this unexpected compliment:
We may also thank Hoaxtead for the excellent detective work they have done in helping to expose this nest of vipers.
Erm….thanks? We think?
Shout out to Richard Hoskins
Equally inexplicably, she has this to say about Dr Richard Hoskins, whose expert research was rejected by former Wiltshire police chief Mike Veale during the ill-fated Project Conifer:
As you know, I consider carefully the recipients of my emails. So I have also forwarded it to Dr Richard Hoskins whom, I was disgusted and appalled to see, was BRUTALLY targetted on social media by your henchpersons David and Cat Scott. These people call themselves Christians! They are liars: the way they jeered loudly online at Dr Hoskins about his choice of gender was, frankly, pure harassment. SHAME ON THEM. (Richard, I thought you might like to read this email – best wishes.)
Okay, we must admit that there is absolutely nothing in this paragraph with which we disagree. We’re still not clear as to why she included Dr Hoskins in her email, but we’re sure he appreciates the sentiment.
Part 2: Elana strikes back
Just as we were assembling today’s post, we received Elana Freeland’s reply. Apparently she doesn’t care for being called an “Illuminati double agent”:
Part 3: Charlotte again
Charlotte isn’t having any. Doesn’t Elana remember her?
But don’t worry, Elana. Charlotte is “totally not malicious”. (Oi! You in back! Stop giggling!) Besides, she’ll keep all the info she has on you under her hat…unless absolutely necessary. Gosh, that’s big of her.
“That’s it. Call off the dogs. Or there will be a mega noise”.
Can we say that we kind of hope that the dogs aren’t called off? We’re looking forward to this pagga—should be a good one!