Deborah Mahmoudieh is DEEPLY disturbed.

Those are her own words, not ours. Just in case you were wondering.

All right, let’s deconstruct this comment (from Abe’s blog, natch):

1. “I am presently involved as a McKenzie friend in the UK Hampstead case“.
   You are? Who are you representing? This is most interesting, as we had understood that Abe & Ella had unceremoniously fired the McKenzie friends who had managed to sabotage their case so spectacularly. Have they reconsidered? And if so, why would they choose Sputtery Debs?
2. “…(H)aving examined all details of this case, I am thoroughly convinced that we are witnessing a huge cover-up“.
   Indeed we are! Abe and Ella and their few remaining friends have all conspired to cover up the fact that they knowingly and cynically used two young vulnerable children as footballs in their very ugly game. They have blamed, slandered, libelled, and harassed everyone under the sun, in an attempt to a) prove the existence of SRA, and b) sell Abe’s astonishing claims about his hemp business.
3. “I do not devote so much time toward things unless, i (sic) have a very strong perception of the facts against fiction and i (sic) am very objective in my analysis‘.
   Really, Debs? REALLY? In that case, we’re sure you’ll be delighted to point us to the physical proof of any SRA, ever. Any physical proof will do. Blood, bones, missing infants, actual hidden rooms, DNA evidence…we’re not choosy. Please let us know when you find it. And remember, your inability to find it is not further proof of a cover-up. That’s just crazy-talk, Debs.
4. ‘I urge you to contact me for further info – because after seeing this latest video you’ve made, it has occurred to me that the “puzzle” of the Holly-Gregg’ (sic) case being a deliberate media-instigated hoax (if that is indeed what it is – have not investigated), then maybe, it was a psy-op to dampen public mood and interest in the event of any REAL cases being exposed such as. (sic) the Hampstead case ?‘
   All right, Debs…we’re trying to follow you here, really we are. Here’s what we’ve got so far: you want us to contact you for further info, because after watching a video, you’ve realised that a case you know nothing about, but which could be a media-instigated hoax, could have been a psy op designed to divert people’s attention from Hoaxtead. Um, sure. You do realise that this makes absolutely no sense, right?
5. ‘Much as I have TRIED to find room for doubting the children’s original allegations, I am left DEEPLY disturbed and concerned for the safety of children in UK and abroad‘.
   So you’ve tried—you’ve really really really tried—to stretch your prodigious brain power and ‘objective analysis’ to take in the astonishing amount of evidence that the children were tortured into making their original allegations. And yet, you’ve failed. And despite the complete lack of any evidence that any of what they described actually happened, you are still DEEPLY disturbed.

That really says it all, doesn’t it?