Angie steals video, posts as her own

Had we been asked, we could have predicted this: when Christine Joanna Hart took down the video of her interview with Angela Fag-Ash Disney and Jake ‘Little Man’ Clarke, Angie would steal her work and appropriate it for herself.

Sure enough, yesterday Angie’s YouTube boasted this:

We had to chuckle at Angie’s note below the video:

Angela-stolen video 2016-05-14

Christine has a surprising initial take on the case yet even so, got brutally trolled in comments and other forums, including what she perceived to be credible death threats. She took the original video down and increased her personal security. The interview, however, has enough important information, to warrant re-uploading, and comments are vetted to keep the likely PAID and INVESTED trolls at bay.

Oddly, that’s not how Christine described it. In fact, she seems to have been more concerned about the abuse Angie herself heaped on her following the interview:

 

Christine Joanna Hart 3

Christine Joanna Hart 2

Whatever one might think about Christine’s background, we think it’s at least commendable that she removed the video, realising that she’d been had by Angie and Jake.

We’d suggest that if Christine wants to have the pirated version removed from YouTube, she report it to YouTube as her property. As many of us have noted over the past year and a half, YouTube is far more receptive to claims of copyright abuse than to concerns about child sexual abuse images and violations of standing court orders.

Internet-Piracy

 

133 thoughts on “Angie steals video, posts as her own

  1. The video has been reported as stolen my myself and Revolution Radio owner Hawk to YT- if it isnt removed it willl be. FYI I have done nothing to be ashamed about in my past – lied about nothing – am being trolled by a man who will no doubt appear on here as he appears everywhere and was thankfully stopped last week by the blog owner. I did a show on cyber crime and trolling as a response to him. My life story has been published by Hodder as Searching For Daddy – it sold over 100k copies. I am now a full time Mother. My stories are not online because it was on the 90’s – I am now getting a website where all my NOTW stories and Sunday Times stories will be scanned in. So come on down Simon – you know you have something to say on here like last week – I’m Jemima Bond and I lie that I was trained by the security services – all things you have done not me. I worked for Ciex Ltd and Knightbridge Company Services all ex MI6 – all provable. Sorry that hurts you.

    Liked by 2 people

    • you only have yourself to blame, seriously, jake clarke? he’s barely out of shorts and hasnt started shaving yet! angie disney? she claims to have been hunted by aliens and that her family are supposedly part of every flippin cult ever. couldnt you find anyone crazier to interview? haha

      Like

      • I stupidly fell for someone else’s recommendation without checking – ever made a misatke? The YT has now been removed – and removed again and she is limited now to only 15 mins on her YT thanks to me – now she is trolling me online so I have paid for my mistake.

        Like

    • Although I hate defending an ex News of the World journalist (my mother would have washed me in bleach) I think Christine is who she says she is. As far as this blog goes I don’t really care about that though. What I appreciate is that she took the video down and understands that Angie and Jake are promoting a hoax that hurts people. Good on ‘er for that.

      I hope she’s successful in getting the video removed again.

      Liked by 4 people

      • Thanks Big Earl I had to do it twice – I also had to fight RR – it is down now for the 2nd time and she she is limited for posting. This didnt stop her from blogging a lot of hate speech about me.

        Like

  2. Something with christine dosent quite ring true,she claims to have been assaulted by Ian Brady who wrapped his long legs around her, pinning her to a chair where he licked her face, all in maximum security Broodmoor for the criminally insane. Christines one of these journos where the story is always about her.

    Like

    • She must have been the only journalist who was left alone with him. I have a journalist friend who was granted limited access to him 25 years ago when researching a book on serial murderers, after endless Home Office pleas. Brady had 2 guards at all times in the room and a Home Office rep who repeatedly nixed certain questions.

      My pal came away with basically zilch new information and concluded the whole exercise was a waste of time. He would have welcomed a leg wrap and face lick as at least giving something to write about.

      Liked by 2 people

      • It does seem very odd that anyone would be left alone with Brady. Honestly, the thought of being within a mile of him makes my stomach churn. I don’t wish to imagine anything involving tongues or legs.

        Like

        • Like much of her writing this is sheer fantasy… Sam is quite correct. Brady is a high risk, high profile prisoner. And all credible accounts of visiting the monster reflect something similar to Sam’s friend’s experience.

          IIRC correctly Brady actually wanted to sue over this ridiculous, defamatory claim when a certain ‘comic’ ran it! – Comparisons were drawn between Hart’s scribbling and “Silence of the lambs”, which isn’t surprising as her tawdry account of her last meeting with Brady is one of the most obviously-plagiarised pieces of drivel I have ever read in my life. – No wonder the opinion is widely voiced that this book is what brought down Mainstream publishing!

          Like

          • Oh dear – Hodder and Mainstream published the full account and quotes about the creep being left alone with all his visitors – and yet you – a failed hack who runs an online blog is the only one who found out the truth – waht a deluded fantasist you are – LOL. Widely voiced – you are going to be back in nick soon as you aren’t allowed on social media with adults now are you.

            Like

  3. Simon? Who the flock is Simon? – Templar?

    Christine, you are a deeply dishonest woman.

    Contrary to what you posted last week, nobody threatend you. I merely pointed out to you that all your attention-seeking with the media may well bring you media attention. And that will not be to your aggrandisement but detriment. – That you’d weave something else out of that merely highlights your own paranoia and/or dishonesty.

    For the record I’m 500 miles away from you, intend staying the hell away from you… No, you’re not of sufficient interest to waste the petrol on. And in any case – you’re such a danger to yourself and other people that I would’t walk on the same side of the street as you without police protection.

    Q was kind enough to lend me his copies of your THREE books. He tells me they were 50p each in one of the local remaindered/2nd hand stores.

    I highly recommend that those who have any doubt as to whether you’re a liar and fantasist start with “The Devil’s Daughter” then move on to “In for the kill” – Both books ARE your work and the latter is certainly more of a ridiculously non-credible fantasy than anything. It also contradicts what you wrote in the first book – so, please do feel free to explain which one of them is the pack of lies?

    As for copyright theft… As explained previously, you yourself are guilty of that. And no, the complete and utter WALT who allegedly gave you that picture had no rights to it either… Which, actually, you’d know perfectly well if you were any of the things ( Spy, Investigator, Journalist) you claim to be.

    And Christine – wasting Police time is an offence. As Q is an ex-copper and often works producing public information films for the Police he has a lot of contacts – I asked him to bring your defamatory rambling last week to their attention.

    Inteviewing Disney and Jerkey was grossly incompetent… YOU published before you’d done the basic due diligence. That shows you up for the amateur you are madam. That Disney has ‘stolen’ your copyright property is as predictable as your own bleating is hypocritical. – As for the rest of your fantasies Christine? REAL professional investigative journalists have loked into your RIDICULOUS childishly-fantastical claims…

    Blabber as much as you like you foolish old woman. Not woth the busfare? Not worth the wear-and-tear on the AA batteries inside my keyboard.

    Like

    • I think that the real story here is less about Christine’s background and more about Angela’s clear violation of copyright. While I too have questions about how how the interview was arranged and conducted in the first place, ultimately the issue is that the interview was conducted; it was removed from YouTube; Angela recorded a copy while she was being interviewed; and Angela chose to post that copy in full knowledge that it belonged to someone else.

      Liked by 2 people

      • I agree up to a point.

        However there is a wider problem which is that of hoaxes and hoaxers generally. The Hampstead hoax and others propogate because there is an ever-growing network of scammers, hoaxers, Mitties, fantasists etc. – All willing to give each other bandwidth. Contributing to that ‘black noise’ (Q’s term not mine) or even lending the slightest credence to any of those making it at best does nothing to solve the problem; in most cases it just adds to it.

        Disney is certainly a thief as well as a fantasist – the matter you outline evidences that. But I’m afraid that what she stole was itself a property of dubious provenance that cannot reasonably be ignored. – For these fantasies that the conspretards devour are the thief of all reason.

        Liked by 1 person

        • Yes, completely agree with you there. The business of selling conspiracy fantasy is much, much larger than I would have imagined before I found myself involved in this thing. Now that I’m here, I find it impossible not to be enraged by the deliberate distortion of truth.

          Liked by 1 person

          • And don;t forget Misery Lit which has caused misery itself for 100s of innocent falsely accused nuns & others who have been accused of heinous unproved crimes.

            Liked by 2 people

      • Oh I think the story is very much about Christine J Hart particular as the ‘activist’ & charity scammer Angela Power-Disney for once can hardly get a word in edgeways as Ms Hart talks mainly about herself.

        I’m particularly drawn to her conclusions about the Jeremy Bamber case which (don’t they all ?) yet again apparently involves Satanic child abuse. This is despite many leading legal figures joining the campaign to prove Bamber innocent. Still she hedges her bets by claiming “no-one can really know what went on in the Bamber case”. Indeed.

        This is a great example of two hoax promoters meeting and clashing. Sorry forgot about the ridiculous Jake Clarke who should be sent to the naughty room until he grows up.

        Liked by 2 people

        • What surprised *me* most about her comments re:the Bamber murders was that Colin Farrell & Colin Powell are BOTH keen experts on them ! That interest may just be the only item that occupies the ‘intersectional’ area within the ‘Tale of Two Colins’ Venn Diagram- one that I’d really love to see, by the way. I mean, if a gruesome late-1980s family slaughteer in rural England doesn’t create common ground between a studly, bad-boy Irish actor and the solemn former US Secretary of State whose once decent reputation went down the crapper after hopping aboard Dubya’s post-9/11 Krayzee Train, what possibly could?

          Like

    • Oh dear Joker (God, yawn… you think you’re so cool yet Mummy’s boy at middle age ain’t that amusing now is it) I was chatting to Nottingham Cops yesterday and naughty little fat you ain’t allowed on social media like grown ups now are you – o’ er not long before they get to your shabby front door in Derby with Mummy and your sad envious obsessive online envy smears of me will be a matter for court before you get sent down yet again. Plus the weird paedo comments and obsession around my 11 year old son. Sean Breach will testify to your behaviour aorund his kids too. As for me being like Disney – er no – sorry it hurts you v v much but I AM a Sunday Times best selling author – Hodder and Stoughton, no matter how many ridiculous envious obsessive rancid fake reviews you post on Amazon fruitlessly and powerlessly. FACT – I worked for over ten years for the News of The World and then 3 years for The Sunday Times in Belfast – something you hate me for because they regarded you as a nutter/hoaxer when you hassle them by ringing up pretending to be a hack. ( a delusive fantasy because all you have ever written on is self published lies and online blogs – never a real paper – hence your illegal trolling of me and my son.
      Becasue you have slahed my tyres and pined them on five occasions you are the subject of a police investigation – you have revealed yourself on here to be my stalker and make no mistake you will serve time I have Sean Breach and the Nottingham cop you went to prison for stalking on side. Folks on here should know where you post using various IDs that you at any time can target any one of them.

      Like

      • Christine – Ever heard of Queen Gertrude?

        In real-life ( which I know you’re not really well acquainted with) the Police will give a stalking victim a great deal of advice – some of which amounts to not acting like a ten-year-old trying to get attention on social media. – They’d tell you to let them get on with the job. It’s fairly obvious then that this is just you – like some sad little teenager – trying to write a social media fantasy that you can later exploit….

        As for myself? As I’m sure EC could probably confirm from his IP records – I’m in central Edinburgh. Happily married with kids, a home that I own and a professional career in the Creative Industries. All the things you failed to achieve….. No criminal record (yes, we all know about yours) whatsoever – not even a parking ticket. I’ve never lived anywhere within 200 miles of Derby! – I think I’ve only been here once! My Mother is sadly long-deceased and rarely left Glasgow in her 74 years….. A day-trip to Ayr was about as exotic as it got for her!

        Yes, I’ve read copies of ALL THREE of your books – helpfully annotated by genuine professional Reporters/Investigators. – It’s important you realise you aren’t even worth the 25p-50p/copy that is the going rate for this garbage. You’ve simply written the same sad sick sordid story three times, upping the plagiarism and the perverted sexual-deviant fantasies with which its salted on each occasion; desperate attempts to get noticed – that’s all.

        But there ARE records that can be checked; people who REALLY were there back in the day who can be spoken to…. And we KNOW you’re a fantasist Christine…. Oh; I know there were also a few hormonal old men you managed to take-in along the way and who gave you a bit of attention. – Look what it cost them though!

        It’s news to me that Derby is in Nottingham, I thought they were miles apart….. Do your professional sleuthing/research skills not actually extend to finding out what force covers which area? (LOL!) But it’s a moot point. Are you bothering another Police force with your stalking fantasies? Hoping they’ll send round a nice burly inspector in his 50s this time?

        I assume though that the police are well-acquainted with your own stalking and attention-seeking past; or at least they quickly become so when they pull up your record? Like the time you were barred from your son’s playgroup for bullying a four-year-old? – Then got on your best MILF costume and had your warped version of the story plastered all over a cheap rag?

        If your tyres had been slashed the Police would be all over it. – More likely this is attention-seeking on your own part if it happened at all. That, or insurance fraud.

        But please Christine…. Please DO feel free to call the cops (www.scotland.police.uk), the marines, your ‘friends’ at MI5 (LOL!)….. Those of us who have done nothing wrong have nothing to fear. – But from what I’ve been able to glean about you, perhaps it’s high time social services got involved? Clearly, if you’re prepared to bully small children and slash your own tyres to get attention, you’re a danger to yourself and other people.

        Christine – for your own sake and more importantly your Son’s sake, go and get the psychiatric help you so very obviously need! – The poor boy – if you’re not driving him into mental illness too – must be mortified by the way you conduct yourself…. The great ‘Journalist’ reduced to wallowing in fantasy on Fuckwitbook, and playing a ‘radio stations’ on your laptop… Take a look in the mirror Christine.

        Like

      • Tell you what Christine – why don’t YOU tell it to them…. EC, if you can access it, would you be kind enough to post the IP I’m currently working from? I’m sure it will help that randomly-chosen police force that isn’t even in the same COUNTRY enormously…. Go see a Doctor Christine; just go get some meds.

        Like

        • I don’t think it’s wise to reveal your IP address here, Joe, but I will vouch for the fact that you’re not posting from anywhere near Nottingham, or even within England.

          Christine, I would appreciate it if you could stop using this blog as a place to post your grievances. We have a very specific remit, and this conversation is contributing nothing to it. While I have tried to be understanding in allowing this conversation to keep going…and going…and going…I think the time has come to stop it. I’m going to close down comments on this post. Please don’t move to another post and keep trying; if you do I shall have no choice but to ban you.

          Like

  4. I ran through the video – things I noted.
    1. Jake Clarke says he is aged 28.
    2. Angela Power Disney says Sabine McNeill is aged 71.
    3. Jake Clarke and his damn talk of “loads of love” – he is a total hate monger.
    4. I lost IQ points listening to the new age bullshit of Jake Clarke – he evidently thinks the Hampstead SRA is connected to ley lines.

    Liked by 3 people

    • I was interested to note that Jake seems unduly fascinated by the, er, mechanics of the sexual abuse he imagines might have been inflicted upon the Hampstead children. I also note that he mentions being ‘under investigation’. If this is the case, it seems to me rather risky to be violating a court order against identifying RD’s children, or indeed publicly maligning RD himself.

      Liked by 3 people

      • That’s a pattern seen fairly often. It was pointed out to me recently that all these fantasies are generated in someone’s warped imagination. And that they fascinate certain individuals because they are titilated by them. – It really IS a form of pornography! As much as a proportion of those drooling over this sort of thing will be just daft/delusional, many will actually be dangerous as this is one way for them to get their ‘kicks’ relatively free of the fear of being ‘had up’ for openly accessing conventional child pornography.

        Liked by 3 people

        • Yes–I think this is how the original fantasy was dreamt up in Abe’s repulsive little mind. He clearly has fetishised various forms of child sexual abuse, and forced RD’s children to act as mouthpieces for his ugly fantasies.

          Liked by 2 people

          • Exactly so E.C. – And that seems to be common ground with many of these cases.

            What gets me is the stupidity of those promoting them. Why don’t they realise that once they get media attention they will be dealing with professional people who really do know how to check records and cross reference stories? Likewise if they involve the police or other authorities, as they often do!

            Liked by 2 people

      • Not unlike Rupert Wilson Quaintance who jokingly (??) claimed he’d like to f*ck a child just to see what it was like. After all, it’s a subject of great hilarity. Obsessions can come out in strange ways and for many of these Satanic Cult promoters, their fixation on child rape is not only alarming but reminds me of times of the old ‘gay bashers’ who end up have gay experiences themselves. I knew one once.

        Liked by 2 people

      • There is no end to their perverted thinking is there?
        I always wondered why the Russian parents were mentioned but the father’s parents never got a look-in but now we know via Power-Disneyland Rides & Jake the Peg that his grandparents and even great grand-parents were ‘inducted ‘ into the cult (because as we know 8/9 year old kids talk about family generations). Surprised the ghastly Abraham Cristie didn’t say the children had drawn up a complicated family chart tracing back a dozen generations to show the family origins stem from Salem. Maybe even Transylvania.

        Liked by 2 people

        • Actually, this is a detail Abe overlooked in his cunning plan to take the conspiraloon corner of the internet by storm. Perhaps he could have drawn up the chart, and just had the children print in the names? Shoddy workmanship, say I.

          Liked by 1 person

        • In response to your latest news further down re: the nursery school closure, SV, it is nothing short of jaw-dropping – and VERY recent ! It couldn’t have been much earlier than last month (and probably even more recently than that) when I looked up the facility, checked out its official ranking (excellent at the time) as well as history (open since the nineties); that was around the time that Jake went on the infamous APD-cam and professed his eternal allegiance to her/ ‘the cause’ while repudiating his own parents’ stern warnings to keep his distance from the whole mess. There’s an outside chance that Mrs. Clarke was simply ready to retire, but that seems far too tidy a coincidence. I am in no way absolving a guy closing in on 30, however immature he may be for his age, of responsibility – far from it. But this appears to be yet *another* example of anyone who enters APD’s orbit inevitably experiencing misfortune shortly thereafter. Of course, *in the event* that a child predator has been prevented from ever inflicting real damage on would-be victims, that is beyond extraordinary !

          Liked by 1 person

          • I think that you may be right that the kindergarten was closed recently. I speculate, but the recent police involvement with Jake Clarke might have been a possible factor in its closing. I think Jake Clarke is a dangerous individual, one who is raising lots of red flags that he might pose a threat to the safety of children. My impression of Mrs Clarke is that she is being pro-active and doing all she can to persuade Jake Clarke away from his self-destructive path.

            Liked by 1 person

    • I agree…and still cannot believe that kid is 28! His fascination with the two children-an ‘interest’ which he presents as completely innocuous and actually benevolent-is so extreme and obsessive that he doesn’t even care about the legally troubled path down which it’s already led him. That’s troubling, to put it mildly…but on a positive note, one would hope that his defiance with respect to law enforcement will have attracted scrutiny of him by its members to some degree. I have a great deal of empathy for his parents (who are vehemently opposed to his involvement in this mess), and also hope that his “concern” is a product of delusional naivete’/possible learning and/or psychological deficits unrelated to anything more sinister (after all, what sane person would actually *want* for him, or anyone else, to pose any potential harm to children?) He alludes specifically to growth problems, comes across as far younger than he actually is, and projects an unmistakable aura of infantilism. I guess we’ll never know his true motivations, but it is patently obvious (at the very least) that Angela has found a perfect pawn in Jake; he is putty in her hands. And on the subject of deleterious I.Q. effects as one listens to the not-so-dynamic duo, I must admit that Jake’s ludicrous etymological tangents are rich sources of unintentional comedy – and they prove he’s blissfully unaware that any languages other than English exist on the planet !

      Liked by 2 people

      • Questions :
        how do we know his parents disagree with his actions? How do we know his mother runs a kindergarten?. How long before Jake begins to search for signs of Satanic Cult abuse among the children who attend that kindergarten? : he believes the UK (and the world) is run by a Satanic Cult.

        When someone who is mentally disturbed commits a terrible act it is generally after a long lead-up time where they begin to ‘join dots’ and some perceived enemy is identified and then attacked. The victim can be someone completely unrelated to them and chosen at random or persons within their vicinity such as school children who may need to be ‘cleansed’ of their Satanic Cult influences.

        I’m appalled to read he has an interest in a kindergarten.

        Liked by 2 people

        • I followed up on the research of a fellow member of the Hoaxtead team cross referencing social media with public records, this reveals that the mother of Jake Clarke is called Natalie Clarke and runs the following kindergarten:
          http://www.findmyschool.co.uk/schooldetails.aspx?id=94693

          The following child protection issues now arise:

          1. Jake Clarke is sharing the images and personal information of abused children with pedophiles, child abusers and their supporters.

          2. Jake Clarke has apparent mental health issues.

          3. Jake Clarke exhibits an unhealthy obsession in the details of sexual abuse and in the children P and Q.

          4. Jake Clarke does not respect or feel restricted by injunctions, privacy or the law.

          5. Jake Clarke is involved in a narrative and with individuals who could orchestrate a Satanic Ritual Abuse involving his mum’s kindergarten.

          6. Jake Clarke seems easily influenced by stronger Satan Hunter personalities, and shows a clear willingness to follow their suggestions.

          I think there is a strong argument that Jake Clarke might pose a risk to the well being of children of his mum’s kindergarton.

          One of my first actions next week about Jake Clarke is to speak to the police about him, and his association with the kindergarten is one of the priority issues I will raise with them.

          Liked by 1 person

      • I can’t claim credit for this – I’ve been in conversation with Q this morning…

        He drew my attention to an American Walt he took on about a year or so ago, one Robert Lee Taylor. Well into his forties, Taylor presents some quite ridiculous fantasies to the world about being ‘military intelligence’ a security expert etc. – The usual crap. This is combined with fantasies about being a record producer (it seems that in his youth Taylor did make some headway on a local scene) and was even blatant enough at one point to have obtained a .gov email address having pulled the wool over the eyes of some local officials…

        http://www.foxnews.com/story/2003/02/27/pentagon-shrugs-at-phony-web-site-linked-to-dod.html

        What was/is notable about Taylor was the ‘manchild’ persona he promoted – James Bond fantasies that really could only be designed to ‘take in’ a child; no adult could be that stupid/inadequate. This was combined with quite a degree of homo-eroticism in the images of himself he posted online. At one point he was to be found on Craigslist advertising for a ‘pro Merrica’ housemate – using pictures of a quite desirable house which he’d pulled from some Estate Agent’s website claiming it as his own… In reality Taylor lived in a run-down shack in a poor part of town, and was well known as the neighbourhood creep people sooed their kids away from…

        Relevant to the Hampstead Hoax? – Well there do seem to be these general common threads where fantasists claim these wild connections and exotic pasts. – Claims to be ex-military and/or intelligence services are common, as are delusions of Journalism etc. Jakey? Rupert? – These are grown men who, if they were normally adjusted would be presenting a very different face to the world.

        Why are they dressed/acting like children? Who is it they hope to attract?

        Liked by 2 people

        • It seems to me that people like Jake and Rupert are playing out their own fantasies about themselves, in hopes of attracting followers/admirers who will heap admiration and praise on them for being so brave and dedicated. It’s perhaps more about convincing themselves of their own adequacy–puffing themselves up to ‘look big’ in the hopes of faking it till they make it. That’s why they react with such rage when people stick pins in the balloons of their own over-expanded delusions about themselves.

          Liked by 2 people

          • Yes but who ARE those followers/admirers? Who are their target audience? – Certainly not any other reasonably sane/sober woman or man – or even any adult looney. At circa 30 years of age, they should be at a stage where they would want to be seen as serious and authoritative even if they are flogging snake-oil.

            Why act in such a childish way? – Pied piping?

            Jake I might just-about accept is displaying symptoms of his developmental problems and a mental age somewhere in the early teens. But Rupert? – A nasty and dangerous piece of work if you ask me.

            Liked by 2 people

          • I agree–I think the followers/admirers are residents of the Conspiraloon Echo Chamber, where people who think the world is run by giant Satanic Masonic lizards with a secret HQ on the Moon gather to pat one another on the back and encourage one another in their bizarre beliefs. You’d think people would grow out of this, but they live in a closed environment, where sanity and critical thinking are in short supply.

            As for the difference between Jake and Rupert, I think Rupert believes his own horn-tooting about how tough he is; this does make him dangerous, as it can reduce any inhibitions he might have about attacking others at any slight provocation. The common thread, of course, is that both Rupert and Jake are immature and thus easy pickings for Angie.

            Liked by 1 person

          • I am beginning to think “power” is what all these Satan Hunter types are seeking, it being their type of drug, manifested in multiple ways such as their activities in the Hampstead SRA hoax.

            Liked by 1 person

          • They’ve misunderstood the difference between power-over and empowerment. They seem to crave power-over others, and to believe that the perceived righteousness of their cause gives them licence to attack whomever they please.

            Liked by 2 people

          • Grown men who dress inappropriately for their age? Step forward the late Jimmy Savile. Who was he trying to attract.

            Like

        • Speaking of “the world is run by giant Satanic Masonic lizards with a secret HQ on the Moon ” (El Coyote) any news of Tory Smith?

          Liked by 1 person

          • tory is being prosecuted by a whitley county prosecutor called mathew j rentschler. tory has now made claims that this man is raping and killing children. what i have found is that tory targets people who piss him off. He is especially vitriolic about an indiana politician called mike pense. mike pense has given his support to a law that lets buisness owners discriminate based on religion. tory sees this as an anti gay hate crime. tory has for 5/6 years been commenting on forums such as before its news, david icke forum etc under the name muscltory. it makes for interesting reading. you can literally see his psyche get more and more extreme year by year.

            Liked by 2 people

          • i forgot to add that tory claims to be out on bail at $20.000 for public nuisance. this seems unlikely for a misdemeanor offence. a quick search for mathew j rentschler shows he is notorious for prosecuting sex offenders and giving them long sentences. very suspicious, i wonder if the contributor (mme clustermuck?) has any info?

            Liked by 1 person

      • He never ever seems to think that maybe there is a couple he could suggest this to, doesn’t he believe this amazing magic technology could be used to clear their names? It’s like some sort of stuck record.

        Liked by 2 people

        • A deafening AMEN TO THAT, YT. Although sociopaths like Abrella are scarily gifted at ‘passing’ lie detector tests by controlling physiological responsrs at will, they should be *begging* for polygraphs to be administered to at least demonstrate the credibility they so ferventlyprofess. After all, isn’t that the closest possible corollary to the ‘tattoo srs

          Liked by 1 person

        • Sorry…tiny boxes strike again. I was *trying* to say that the clearly mendacious Abrella should be BEGGING for polygraph tests aimed at proving their credibility, just as they insist that all slandered/libelled school staff, clergy and parents bare all/ display tatt-free privates in order to prove *their* innocence as well. A repulsively farcical double standard, the likes of which few-if any- have ever seen in a contemporary civilised society. Delusional freaks of nature !

          Liked by 1 person

      • wow I wonder if he worked with the “whistleblower” and “ex-MI5 agent” Andrea Davison who skipped town after she was convicted of embezzlement (set up by MI5 obviously. Or was MI6?)

        Liked by 1 person

      • EC,my comments are still coming through garbled and/or not at all. Were I not dealing with so much else right now, I would ideally have a new phone, laptop, car, dog and house by now… Anyway, k-nine’s comments are so far over to the right side of my phone that I’m given no option to reply- I am not ignoring you, k-nine !
        I just left a message for one of my IN friends (this morning) who has long fought for “Tory” to be locked up and is thrilled; I’m sure I’ll hear back from him this week and will let you know what’s up at that point. Apparently there is a mountain of incriminating evidence against him from IN, FL, and at least one other state. He does hate Pence (as do many for his homophobia/ generally discriminatory beliefs and bigoted policies), but ‘Tory’ is an equal-opportunity offender/psycho who does not just single out right-wingers. Case in point: he claims that Obama asked him to be his gay spouse and, when T spurned him, O raped him 261(!) times exactly / injected chemicals into his genitals that rendered them sexually unusable for the rest of his life. (Obama tends to overreact to romantic rejection, apparently !)

        That forum info is hilarious, especially his username…

        Finally, my understanding is that he has yet to be nailed for acting on any fantasies regarding *children*, and I certainly hope that’s true. There are some extremely serious charges against him, though, dating back a number of years- at least that’s what I’ve been told. Will keep you informed of what I find out as soon as I get the latest…

        Liked by 1 person

        • thanks for replying, that was hilarious, its a shame tory has to keep going on about children all the time because he is funny, it always makes me laugh when i read the comments of people who’ve stumbled on his channel.He takes it way to far though, way beyond acceptable.

          Liked by 1 person

    • Good on Microwavable Merlin ! He always knows just how to back these loons into the corners where they belong, as evidenced by their replies to him (inevitably nonsensical or, even more commonly, nonexistent !)

      Liked by 1 person

  5. I’m more amazed that Christine J Hart is ‘reporting’ from London and she apparently hadn’t heard about the Hampstead case. Uhh?. And her producer sent her a video of the children (illegal & a breach of High Court order & injunction ) which seems to be the first time she has heard about a scandal that appeared basically in every British media outlet and went worldwide.

    She needs to have a word with her producer who put her onto a charity scammer and a 28 year old dolt who has repeatedly broken UK criminal law in identifying child abuse victims.

    And a woman in Ireland who accuses numerous people of heinous crimes for which there is no proof ( one whom a High Court judgement has found to be completely innocent) is not an “activist”: she is a troll, she is false accuser, she is a menace and a vile piece of work who promotes a vicious hoax that has caused distress fro dozens of innocent people.

    Liked by 3 people

    • Incidentally : the excellent former Bangkok based British journalist Andrew Drummond who exposed dozens of scams ripping off ex-pats in Thailand along with seeking out wanted UK criminals and was the ‘go-too’ guy for media outlets around the world needing investigations in Thailand immediately removed the ‘News of The World’ banner from his website once the hacking scandal broke and it became apparent it involved 100s of criminal acts by that newspaper.

      That banner has never re-appeared on his site although his work still appeared in News Corp newspapers in the UK, USA & Australia. (he fled Thailand 2 years ago after credible threats to he & his family from local gangsters).

      Liked by 2 people

    • I was also amazed that Hart allegedly heard about the hoax for the very first time during that broadcast for the exact reasons you cite, GoS…and also because I assume she doesn’t reside under a rock in the unidentified London suburb/ “Hampstead-like village”she calls home. Although she expresses extreme frustration with her neighbourhood due to targeted harassment and multiple vandalism claims, she definitely characterises the community as very similar to Hampstead (for better or worse, mostly the latter) in her opening statements. Combined with the extensive press coverage you cite, that alone makes her lack of prior knowledge of the hoax bizarre at best.
      —–
      One noteworthy person Hart and Power-Disney both appear to know quite well is Miles Johnston (himself a conman whose loyal audience is mainly comprised of delusional fantasists, but that’s just my opinion of his projects and agenda !) Anyway, considering how much time he has spent with each of them on the record/ publicly, I suspected from the start that he was likely the “common denominator” who brought the two together (and the dolt just went along for the ride to make himself sound insightful, to disastrous but hilarious effect.) Admittedly, I could be completely wrong in my assumption, but Johnston certainly knows both women very well, has shared a lot of airtime with each- and quite recently, too.

      Like

    • GoS, I will reply to you here about Jake’s family anger and business….the box was too tiny up there.

      ——–
      Obviously i cannot go into certain details here, but they can all be found online. We only know about parental anger via Jake in a Skype session with APD… the one in which he duscusses,havibg been referred to mental health care for rage and anxuety issues related to his involvement wurh this. He specifucalky

      Like

    • Here i go again…one more attempt to answer your questions about Jake’s parents’ anger. New laptop soon !
      ——–
      We only know of their anger and worry through him and i think it is likely true. During a Skype chat with A, he admits he has been referred to a therapist due to rage and anxiety linked to the case and, more specifically, the damage it is causing at home; his parents are angered by his involvement, but A applauds him for sticking to his principles and ignoring his parents’ very legitimate worries. This is one of the most flagrantly manipulative performances c/o APD to date. He may be an adult, but he is apparently a troubled one still living at home as a man of nearly 30. I believe him when he reports this domestic strife, and APD is visibly triumphant when she realises she has successfully usurped the position of both parents.
      ———
      I will not mention his hometown here, but it is near Milton Keynes and has a very odd name, two words. He grew up in that house with 4 or 5 siblings. His grandfather had a wing to himself which was converted to a nursery/child care facility – a small one which only accepts 12 kids or so – and the facility and services provided receive consistently excellent ratings based on parent surveys, inspections, etc. His mother N has degrees in childhood education (possibly a Master’s, not sure about that though) and has run this small business since the 90s, if memory serves. His father runs at least one business outside the home and is a visible participant in the social scene about town. I am not sure where J is in terms of birth order, but i he is right in the middle. Based on the Clarke kids’ online pics, they are financially sound. Could be wrong…but they live in a nice, large hone and the kids take exotic trips globally Jake was in Sri Lanka last year, his younger sister somewhere in Africa. I do not know how many Clarke kids still live at home, but think it is only J and possibly a younger sister.

      So, in my limited view, i can only imagine building a respectable nursery business for so long, likely employing my own children to help out at times, only to discover one infernal day that most, if not all, of it is in pieces because my grown son has become deeply involved in this obvious hoax, believes his path is one that will liberate all children worldwide, making naive legal missteps along the way that eventually lead him to lose his right to be around or working with kids, thereby shattering my livelihood as well as any ability to trust my son’s actions and, most of all, to feel secure that he will lead a happy/fulfilled life – what we parents want mote than anything for our kids.

      What he is up to right now, under the spell of that sociopathic, narcissistic witch, imperils everything normal in the personal and professional lives of that family , which easily explains any parental fury/angst

      That‘s the way i see it as a parent who is normally very calm but would freak to pieces if one of mine turned into a Jake. Fortunately, i don’t see that ever happening, which is why i an so incredibly grateful but also deeply empathetic towards those parents. I would likely require heavy sedation and/ or electroconvulsive shock therapy !

      Liked by 1 person

      • Oops. NONE of this was difficult to locate or wade through…a quick perusal of his FB one afternoon led me to everything. His hometown has an, erm, aviary theme in its two- word name…sorry so long, and i really hope my phone did not throw in too many extra letters or commas or, of course, typos. I simply cannot WAIT for my new laptop !

        Liked by 1 person

      • You are very kind to respond and obviously made of sterner stuff than I: I find it extremely difficult to make it even half way through one of these videos.

        ## except perhaps Patrick Culinane as his act can be extremely funny as he accuse various local authorities of crimes of treason ( I’m beginning to think he’s having a lend of everyone & it’s a carefully planned act by a great Irish comedian) and maybe even the occasional Deborah Mahoodiwhatever her name is as she rises to a crescendo of outrage.

        Liked by 1 person

        • Haha, I’ve got to check out some of those Cullinane vids now ! Some really are masterpieces of unintentional comedy, while others (e g. pretty much any Neelu production) are instant cures for the most recalcitrant cases of insomnia known to man…

          I’m just very glad my response reached you at last, mangled by an unruly keyboard but still intact (more or less) despite a wobbly start and a couple of massive pond crossings !

          Liked by 1 person

      • She’s ignorant of many things – not least the practices protocols and realities of Journalism. That much is evident from her books.

        Like

        • But I got a whole LOT further than you have in the journalistic field, eh Slymon. And oh it hurts – dont it – oh so HURTS. Stupid f. Graham Johnston and I were just laughing hilariously about you the other day – and the other eedjit Carl Wannabee Fellstrom. ha ha.

          Like

    • I had heard of it but not read about it because I was abused by my father and assumed it was the real deal – can’t face details. I am now clued up – realise I made a mistake – this was why I spent a long time fighting APD to take it down. It seems I also had to fight RR as she went to them. It was an error one I am embarrassed about. I now have her as a troll – great – not.

      Like

    • I keep replying and it goes missing. I did not read about the case as I assumed it was real and did not want to hear due to my adoptive father using me as a child – contrary to Joker’s posts to tell me this isn’t true and he was a good man – he has also posted same all over social media. My father would be pleased to know he has such a supporter. I have no hate for him – it has taken years but I forgave him.

      Like

  6. WTF? This is just getting weird now. I was starting to like Christine but she appears to be stooping to Angie’s level now by making up death threats:

    On the other hand, I’m glad she’s finally stopped shouting about how gorgeous she thinks she is and admitted she looks like Lee Marvin.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Plus Christine STILL thinks there’s a website somewhere called “Hampstead Hoaxsted”. I can’t find said mythical blog, so I’ll have to settle for posting this comment here on Hoaxtead Research instead.

      Liked by 2 people

      • Another howler, this time c/o Gabriella… if i read much more of this i am certain i am going to rupture a vital organ or three ! ! !

        Anyone know why CJH is so profoundly convinced that EVERYONE is frightfully
        “jealous/ envious” of her?!

        Liked by 1 person

    • Yes Polly. That’s what I’m referring to in my post above… Something you’d expect from a pre-teen child.

      I pointed out to her that if she kept seeking media attention, and indulging in the fantasies she does – i.e. all the tripe about being ex-security services/ace reporter etc. she is likely to find that the media ‘out’ her as the ‘Mitty’ she is… In much the same way as military types on both side of the pond are railing against those who wander about pretending to be ex-services. – Stolen valour they call it. Which, factually, Christine does also indulge in as (variously) her LinkedIn page and her latter books evidence.

      From that and the gutter-sweepings of her own mind she constructed this latest fantasy of hers. And for the record, no I am not now and never have been in the forces or the security services. But like many people who work in the Creative Industries (which includes the press) I grow tired of the Mitties, fakes and wannabees that infest these trades. I’m reliably informed that those who work and/or worked in news are even more tired. And it seems if Christine wants to make herself the centre of a story Christine might just get here own way. But she would do well to remember what REALLY happened when she sold the story that she was Ian Brady’s daughter to the red-tops.

      Sam is correct in his post below… The Harts (a very decent family by all reasoable accounts) were devastated when Christine sold her fairy story to the red tops, as was most of the local community. She was more-or-less disowned by them and fled to New York where she lived in squalour – no work permit meant no regular/legitimate work. And having blown the cash she was paid for her story she got into a situation where she was pretty-much on the streets without the air-fare home. – Although it’s heavily embroidered, much of this is confirmed in her first book, which she has twice more recently attempted to re-write in her hope of ‘resetting’ her personal history.

      I believe research is currently ongoing as to what the eventual situation became with her family.

      Like

      • Resaerch going on Joker? What that menas is you are still targetting me. A CRIME. t Targeting me – along with brave cops in Nottingham Police – and Sean Breach and many many other victims – we are using this as further evidence to put you where you belong – behind bars for your onlne hate stalking and harrassment and I have records of 3 years of online harrassment off of you. I also have journalists investigating you – Graham Johnston being one of them as we are workiing on a documentary about me – yes the news team you said would knock down my door is Panorama – with me working fully for them on what else went on at News Coprs. Iit won’t be long before you choose victims out of the bloggers on here – most of your targets were once freinds as I once was Simon. As for re-settng my history – nah mate – unlike you I have little to be ashamed about and am very very open to help others to make my own life worthwhile. The latter story you revolting accuse me of selling nah – mate my friend Phil Hall who was my boyfriend at the time who wrote because I was an orphan Brady was my long lost father will be part of the documentary as it was an odd way to enter Fleet St. But then the PI agency made it a part of selling me to Phil Hall that they get a contract off The People. I later introduced Phil Hall to John Boyall who bought in Hacker Mulcaire – so he also bought in hacking yet it was blamed on RB and Andy Coulson. Any more envious hate Simon? You know how pathetic you sound with your teenage obsession with me? I am worried about your pain when you see me in the Johnston docu – I don’t think you can take it – hearing his views on me being the best investigator Fleet Street has ever known – hurts someone like you that dots your is and your ts yet never makes it to the big tme and then wonders why I do – and yet I’m flakey and an orphan and got an education late in life. Yup I make mistakes over witches like APD but I am gifted and you you are just one of many Fleet St wannnabees who cannot stand the reality of life as you have created it. I get your obsessive Fatal Attraction hate of me that is just about to be made public, I really do and bottom line is I truly don’t want you to get what is coming.

        Like

        • LOL – You’re almost funny Christine….. I’ve still no idea who “Simon” is! The fact that Journalists are investigating YOU and your sad little fairy story is a crime? But ‘somehow’ it’s ‘OK’ for journalists you ‘approve’ of to investigate other people? – Aye right! – Yer erse it oot the windae as we say up here!

          You don’t have records of three years of interacting an ANY way with me. The only place I’ve commented on you and your sick perverted fantasies is right here. – As I say Christine, please DO have the Police investigate me, that’s an open invitation. – EC is welcome to publish my IP address…..

          You need to realise though that the only person who believes/knows the fantasy world inside your head is yourself…. Slashed tyres? Blowouts? – Why don’t you park up where there is CCTV? Why don’t you set some up at home? – Possibly because YOU are the one with the knife?

          You’re a sad, sick, fantasist Christine. You need psychiatric help. – Unlike you I actually DO have access to REAL television journalists. And the only story anyone is likely to make about you is the diary of a madwoman….. That isn’t going to do your son any good; the poor lad already has to ‘live you down’ as he goes into his teens…. You royally fucked up your own life – are you really going to do that to him too?

          – Could you not get to a doctor, get the appropriate treatment? Maybe get yourself a nice honest job on the checkout at Sainsbury’s? Maybe eventually, once you’re properly calmed down, somebody decent will come along with whom you might share your twightlight years? There is hope in reality Christine; the only person you’re damaging is yourself.

          A masochist is someone who likes a cold shower, so takes a hot one. – And I think I’ll leave it at that…. No doubt you’ll rant on and on and on….. The only person stalking or tormenting Christine Hart is Christine Hart. and she’s also the only person who is really taken in by her. – Go get some medical help Christine; really!

          Like

    • I bet you are gorgeous – Polly one of life lucky ones! As for death threats nothing to do with Hampstead dear – a convicted troll who has just got out of prison – and has threatened South African Mercenary Sean Breach and a whole lot of others including Nottingham Police. My tyres have been attacked on many occasion and he is a suspect in the ongoing investigation. Thanks for visiting my facebook page – you are most welcome.

      Like

  7. It seems Christine is rather reliant on her share of an inheritance. Sound familiar?

    By the way, why would she be due anything from her “fake mother” anyway? Anyone?

    Liked by 1 person

    • Can people rent wealthy “blow-up mother dolls” eager to part with their fortunes in her village or something? That’s all I can figure out. Where/how do I sign up to become a resident?🙂

      Like

    • well if she was legally her mother- fake or not – she is entitled to a share in the estate.
      Perhaps the adoptive brother is rather pissed off that his mother has been maligned by her (fake?) daughter.

      That’s the problem with airing your dirty laundry in public. There are unexpected consequences and that elusive concept “closure” is rarely found.

      Like

      • Thankyou, yes, I am due something – my brother also got a little equal something the main part – its only small – went to the church – my orphanage the Crusades plus =- the Claretian fathers and my aunts order – Daughters of St Paul of Rome. My brother is upset full of hatred for her but to me it is like an apology. I confronted her with what my father did before she died and she read my book – yet she left me her jewellery and a letter that she always loved me but was so sad herself in her marriage that she found it hard to show it. I agree washing laundry in public gets nowhere it just attracts fleas who it triggers for God knows what reasons. I always wanted to write novels – used my own life – got rejected yet managed to sell in non fiction – as have useless imagination and a pretty mad life I suppose trying to work out what had gone on in it and why. The upshot is get landed with my stalker – Simon but am getting used to it as his victims have now formed a very powerful group. His days of hate are over and will end with a cell. There is good people on here – EC – Miss Camden Baths – And I’ll Remember – I’m very sorry I have not been in the right mindset to thank them for their very kind comments on other threads – but Simon in return triggers me with his comments maybe because he is a perfect twin sister of my adoptive Mother when she was angry. But oddly reading him on here – it is having the affect of making me heal. Mummy is nasty – she does hate you won’t very get rid of her even though she’s dead as her brand of envious demonizing evil will always be here – there will always be someone who hates. I am good friends with the mother of actor Tom Hardy and even he has stalkers online. I think his are trolls as he hasn’t had physical attack. I can learn that I have the human right to get police protection from it. I can learn I can call it out for the lies evil and downright stalking and hate crime and falsification that is it based on his life on non achievement he blames on me to call my life out as lies – my life has been too sillly to be lies – my memoirs are not lies and I have docu prrof that was shown to Hodder and Stoughton and Mainstream as it had to be. I am no APD and I was stupid to have somehow got roped into such but I was warned that like you Simon she was envious of me. As for the envy – yup it is nothing but madness or ‘gutter sweeping of thier sick minds as the hate troll Simon spews. I stick to my envy for Sharon Stone and Liz Taylor – its sad but there you have it. Thankyou.

        Like

    • Sorry… Which is the lie here? Did she live in a poor neighbourhood? Or was home a “Victorian terrace in the Surrey countryside with dark green shutters on the windows and cool high-ceilinged creme-pained rooms with floral curtains and leather wing-backed chairs. ” Christine also notes that “Our village was in a well-to-do, quiet area with big Mercedes parked outside the sprawling Mansions.” and tells us that her “daddy” owned a “gold-coloured” Bentley.

      I quote of course from “in for the kill” – “A TRUE STORY OF HUNTING EVIL”.

      Like

      • Yes, In this regard she is very much a bargain-basement Heather Mills. Mills changes her past depending on who she’s talking to, sometimes she came from a very priviliged background, sometimes dirt poor.

        Hart has written the same book about 5 times now with ever-diminishing returns it would appear.

        Like

        • You are so envious I met Mills – eh – well eat your heart out as she is suing Nick Parker from The Sun and as I took part in the blag on her and have emails to prove that i am appearing in court on her side – awwww something else for you to get envious and obssess about Simon eh. Plenty of time to do such in prison – stalking a woman and a child and slashing tyres causing a blow out with one knife attack so it is being treated as far far more serious and you are under surveillance make no mistake of that and they will get the evidence they need on you to put you away. As for my father owning a Bentley after years on and off as a bricklayer and earning nothing he bought a gold Bentley in a bid to do a chaffeur service you little worm. smear smear lie lie lie — own up to your sickening obsession and envy and criminal activity – the cop I spoke to last night infomred me you do this to ALL your victims infact most of them are found from the blogs on child abuse you frequent. I’m wondering why you are there – we assume you are a victim and hence the preoccupation. Sean Breach thinks differently.

          Like

      • It was a fairly well to do area for working class, Simon – but not in the way somewhere like Hampstead is. It rather depends who you are talking to. It was done out in a very classy way as it was my grandmothers house and she or rather her husband was senior military and had returned from India and had a very lovely taste. My adoptive family were very poor as he drank and did not work but we lived with them. AW you havent mamaged to spew hate on me – AWWWWWWWWW bad day for Simon eh back to the drawing board come on what else have you got? You don’t need Koetting to make sure you will get yours eh!

        Like

  8. MMF – found this Angie Power -Disney doll available on line, perhaps it snores and smokes less than the real one? (and its much more truthful)

    Like

  9. Same smile but not Jake – the look of glee says it all.

    Advice to Jake – stick with Kleenex, it wont land you arrested and in Court!!

    Liked by 1 person

  10. There have been more posts on Facebook by Christopher ‘Everturd’ Everard (his nickname now seems even more appropriate considering his recent post) mentioning Hampstead. Everard is obsessed with the subjects he claims to “expose.”

    His post from yesterday:
    *******************************************
    Christopher Everard added 7 new photos.
    Yesterday at 10:55 ·

    What did the whistleblower children of Hampstead warn us about? They said that the pedo-cannibal cult taught children to eat their own pooh. And what do we see local and national governments doing? We see them spending millions of dollars of our taxes on pooh – they are placing pooh sculpture everywhere. This, ladies and gentlemen is the glorification of the Aghori black magic cult, the eulogy to excrement and filth we find at the heart of the satanic cult movement.

    Like

  11. Worth reproducing – Which can be done safely under US ‘Fair Use’ rules…

    “Concerned Civilians”

    Many individuals who report information to the authorities about deviant sexual activity they have discovered on the Internet must invent clever excuses for how and why they came upon such material. They often start out pursuing their own sexual/ deviant interests, but then decide to report to law enforcement either because it went too far, they are afraid they may have been monitored by authorities, or they need to rationalize their perversions as having some higher purpose or value. Rather than honestly admitting their own deviant interests, they make up elaborate explanations to justify finding the material. Some claim to be journalists, researchers, or outraged and concerned members of society trying to protect a child or help law enforcement.

    In any case, what they find may still have to be investigated. If information from such “concerned civilians” is part of the basis for an expert’s opinion in the warrant, there could be questions concerning its origin, reliability, and accuracy. Investigators must consider the true motivations of these “concerned civilians” who report such activity. They may be individuals who, among other things, have

    ■ Embellished and falsified an elaborate tale of perversion and criminal activity on the Internet based on their need to rationalize or deny their own deviant sexual interests

    ■ Uncovered other people using the Internet to validate and reinforce bizarre, perverted sexual fantasies and interests (a common occurrence), but these other people are not engaged in criminal activity

    ■ Uncovered other people involved in criminal activity

    One especially sensitive area for investigators is the preferential sex offender who presents himself as a concerned civilian reporting what he inadvertently “discovered” in cyberspace or requesting to work with law enforcement to search for child pornography and protect children. Other than the obvious benefit of legal justification for their past or future activity, most do this as part of their need to rationalize and validate their behavior as worthwhile and gain access to children. When these offenders are caught, instead of recognizing this activity as part of their preferential pattern of behavior, the courts sometimes give them leniency because of their “good deeds.”

    Preferential sex offenders who are also law-enforcement officers sometimes claim their activity was part of some well-intentioned, but unauthorized investigation.

    In the best-case scenario, these “concerned civilians” are well-intentioned, overzealous, and poorly trained individuals who are, therefore, more likely to make mistakes and errors in judgment that may jeopardize a successful prosecution.

    In the worst-case scenario these “concerned civilians” can be sex offenders attempting to justify and get legal permission for their deviant sexual interests. In any case investigators should never sanction or encourage civilians to engage in “proactive investigation” in these cases, even if they are working with the media and the department thinks they want potentially positive publicity. Investigators should always encourage civilians to immediately and honestly report any criminal activity they inadvertently discover online.

    Liked by 1 person

    • It is worth reproducing.

      He is something of a bogeyman to conspiraloons for his paper on so-called ritual abuse, but all these people, on the DI forums, those lapping up tales, befriending victims, searching for illegal images, it should make people have a double take and think what actually are the motivations of some of these people…….

      Here’s the paper that offends some:

      https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/Digitization/136592NCJRS.pdf

      To me, his overriding focus on victims shines through.

      There’s a reason CEOP and similar give the responses they do when people report sites with illegal content. They know the truth of what’s outlined in that paper..,…..

      Liked by 1 person

    • And this bit

      “Preferential sex offenders who are also law-enforcement officers sometimes claim their activity was part of some well-intentioned, but unauthorized investigation”

      If someone is actually silly enough to think this man lets law enforcement have a free ride.

      Liked by 1 person

    • I think it may have just sunk in, how many people I think of when I read those bullet points, as possibles, and I mean the first two.

      People need to be aware of this. There is vetting of teachers, of solicitors, of social workers, but nothing for these self styled child abusers warriors.

      I’ve often thought some have a particularly ghoulish prurient interest in the detail.

      Liked by 1 person

  12. Pingback: Everard’s paedophilic excrementalism | HOAXTEAD RESEARCH

    • “Computer systems are consciousness weapons, and the user is Always [sic] traceable, that’s the whole point of the computer technology we have taken on board. So as Chris is a Psi Warrior in the Astral, she can track you down, and here she is declaring War On the Trolls.”

      LOL! 😄

      Liked by 1 person

      • She goes a bit “Deborah Madmoodyeah” on this at times..shouting the odds. Her voice gets really annoying after a while..

        Like

  13. Jeeze! I’m amazed you guys has the patience to listen beyond about the first two minutes of this infantile amateur rubbish! I’ve now read through all three of her ‘books’. What a trial! The things we do in the name of research! Each contradicts the other, they’re all really childishly written. – The woman is very clearly a lifelong fantasist with some really bizarre things going on in her head. – Really something of a sicko when you read the drivel she’s generated. In this latest iteration of her dreamworld she’s simply scraping the bottom of the barrel for attention – the conspiritainment industry.

    What a loser!

    Liked by 1 person

    • LOL! Yes, I did listen to it all, I’m amazed you managed to read all 3 of her books! Did you ever read Charlotte Ward’s ‘Illuminati Party’ book..now that was a laugh and a half!

      Liked by 1 person

      • (Un)fortunately one of the key skills I need for my job is the ability to rattle through and assimilate written material quickly. – I had borrowed copies which, helpfully, were full of sticky notes highlighting where one book contradicted another. They’re more or less the same tale told three times with increasing amounts of fantasy and plagiarism thrown in – “In for the Kill”, the last one, really is complete and utter twaddle! Really childish.

        ‘Illuminati Party’? No… Not read/don’t have that one. But then nobody is particularly ‘bothered’ about Charlotte Ward. She’s not even a flash in the pan, just a dull spark. And I’m not sure that her ‘book’ was ever really a book! – Is it not just some insane rambling some obscure nutter published as a PDF?

        Like

        • Actually, ‘Jacqui’s’ book is more of a set-up piece: she wrote it in November/December 2014, just before being tapped by Belinda McKenzie to become the official libellous videomaker and blogger of Hoaxtead.

          Her previous gig, as Charlotte Ward, had been more along the lines of wanna-be academic, with a major in ‘conspirituality’. The book, it seems, was intended to cement her change of identity and demonstrate her bona fides as a Hoaxtead operative. It’s more interesting for what it leaves out than for what it describes. And it tells us a great deal about how this hoax was orchestrated from the beginning.

          Like

Comments are closed.