Many thanks to The Armchair Detective for sending us this guest post with more thoughts on why Abrella might not really wish to keep pursuing a re-investigation into the Hampstead hoax:
What Abraham may not fully appreciate is that a more detailed report will also include more details about him, and what informed the direction the investigation took, and what action was or was not taken regarding the investigation of the ‘allegations’.
Examples of some of the things that might need to be ‘ventilated’ and could cause him serious problems: What can the IPCC and police reveal given the limits of confidentiality required due to the family court restrictions in place?
In order to fully answer points asked by Ella for the IPCC complaint appeal, the police would have to show results of their intelligence gathering.
This can be seen in the CRIS, here:
An exposé into the police discovery from the above action could clarify an intriguing element in para 30 in the judgement, which, in my opinion, was deliberately vague, perhaps to protect Jean Clement from the mad brother-in-law whom he may fear—since he does have a fire-arms history and violence convictions, and might just consider his confidant to be a ‘snitch’. But we applaud you, Jean Clement, for your bravery in this case.
The intelligence gathered could shed light on the possible premeditation of Abrella’s actions—before they ever went to Morocco, before the ‘disclosures’ ’emerged’ which only happened, according to Ella, in mid-August. However, see the reference to ‘JULY’ in the last line here, which suggests planning way before the trip:
And then, another example of what might just surface in the IPCC responses: I found this little gem:
Now, I wonder what could be on file with social services already about Abraham?
While doing some digging, I also found this:
…as well as this post from Hoaxtead Research, which also corroborates this:
For the people who still want to support Abraham, and say they are child abuse victims’ supporters, do you not see you are supporting a child abuser, is it not crystal clear?
How much more do you need?
This is a child’s account of Abraham’s abuse corroborated by an adult who had ALSO once been a child in his care. This is on file with social services. An old file. Not a cover up. True. It is undeniable. The police had access to the file via social services.
See the hornet’s nest that you are poking with your stick, Abrella?