Poking the hornets’ nest

Many thanks to The Armchair Detective for sending us this guest post with more thoughts on why Abrella might not really wish to keep pursuing a re-investigation into the Hampstead hoax:

What Abraham may not fully appreciate is that a more detailed report will also include more details about him, and what informed the direction the investigation took, and what action was or was not taken regarding the investigation of the ‘allegations’.

Examples of some of the things that might need to be ‘ventilated’ and could cause him serious problems: What can the IPCC and police reveal given the limits of confidentiality required due to the family court restrictions in place?

In order to fully answer points asked by Ella for the IPCC complaint appeal, the police would have to show results of their intelligence gathering.

This can be seen in the CRIS, here:

1 Fernandez-2014-09-10

An exposé into the police discovery from the above action could clarify an intriguing element in para 30 in the judgement, which, in my opinion, was deliberately vague, perhaps to protect Jean Clement from the mad brother-in-law whom he may fear—since he does have a fire-arms history and violence convictions, and might just consider his confidant to be a ‘snitch’. But we applaud you, Jean Clement, for your bravery in this case.

The intelligence gathered could shed light on the possible premeditation of Abrella’s actions—before they ever went to Morocco, before the ‘disclosures’ ’emerged’ which only happened, according to Ella, in mid-August. However, see the reference to ‘JULY’ in the last line here, which suggests planning way before the trip:

2 Judgement

And then, another example of what might just surface in the IPCC responses: I found this little gem:

3 ActionsAgreed

 

Now, I wonder what could be on file with social services already about Abraham?

4 Chantelle

While doing some digging, I also found this:

5 Chantelle

…as well as this post from Hoaxtead Research, which also corroborates this:

6 Crying=Lying

For the people who still want to support Abraham, and say they are child abuse victims’ supporters, do you not see you are supporting a child abuser, is it not crystal clear?

How much more do you need?

This is a child’s account of Abraham’s abuse corroborated by an adult who had ALSO once been a child in his care. This is on file with social services. An old file. Not a cover up. True. It is undeniable. The police had access to the file via social services.

See the hornet’s nest that you are poking with your stick, Abrella?

hornet next

90 thoughts on “Poking the hornets’ nest

  1. Hang on, I missed something there:

    ‘Abraham (stepfather) made my brother lie about my (real) father being an abuser’ which was a lie….’

    OMG so he has done the exact same thing before. Moved in on a woman with children and then made the children accuse the real father of abuse.

    What say you now, Abraham????

    It’s gonna all be on file. And it won’t take much to re-interview those children who are now adults, if the police want to mount a historic child abuse investigation?

    Liked by 2 people

  2. Even more missed details: para 149:

    Q was distressed…’he thought we was lying – when I cried and said

    MY MUM NEVER TOUCHED US

    he said ‘if you’re crying, you’re lying’

    WTF???? So Abraham not only accused the children’s father of sexual abuse, but also Ella OF TOUCHING THEM?

    Liked by 1 person

  3. It is curious that Abraham has made the complaint public, and the IPCC letters public, but not the initial report by the police. It may already contain information that Abraham doesn’t want to be made public.

    If the police have Abraham’s phone they should have been able to find out when Abraham first contacted Jean Clement. If there was premeditation before they left the UK, I would hope the police could bring some form of charges.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. This is why I am very sceptical about the so-called IPCC letter. The IPCC would have had to ask the police involved for their views and justifications. The police would have checked the petty criminal Abraham Cristie’s background and would have seen his abuse is already on file while RD has no such record.

    Arresting RD would have made no difference to the outcome. Abella are clutching at straws as are their nutty supporters. Abe sounds like a compete control freak. The only ones he controls now are Ella, Neelu and McNeil

    Liked by 1 person

  5. Well Tweedle Dee and Tweedle Dumb have done it again!

    I think they may have upstaged themselves on this one. The last 20mins on the second part is just GOLD!!! You cannot make this shit up.

    However, listening to them go in n out of them believing what they are saying, then with the next breath know they are lying, is in fact….scary!

    These two must be the dumbest fcukwits in exsistence.

    It‘s comical! It‘s scary! It‘s nonsensical! It‘s absurd, inane, senseless, stupid, ridiculous, illogical.

    These two fcukwits are downright dangerous to themselves and others.

    Liked by 1 person

    • I listened to that bit. The explanation for the injuries would be comical if it weren’t such a sad situation. They photographed the evidence themselves and are happy to broadcast it to the world, yet Ella claims the injuries occurred later. Someone will fall for it though.

      Liked by 1 person

  6. Pingback: So much for Satanism. | HOAXTEAD RESEARCH

  7. Pingback: Poking the hornet’s nest | Sheva's Cross of Change Blog

  8. Pingback: David Shurter doesn’t like Hoaxtead Research | HOAXTEAD RESEARCH

Comments are closed.