Angela gets back to basics

It can be morbidly fascinating to watch how Angela Power-Disney’s version of the Hampstead SRA hoax has morphed over time. Yesterday we touched on this: her most recent video, a YouTube live-stream on Jason Goodman’s “Crowdsource the Truth” channel, seems to represent a sudden return to orthodoxy.

However, ’twas not always thus.

An ever-twisting narrative

In early 2016, Angela began to claim (in a video with a person whose case is currently pending) that she believed Abraham Christie was “implicated”, as he seemed to know too much about Satanism.

Then, in September 2016, Angela called Jake Clarke, who was then in hospital, and claimed that she and Rupert Quaintance had been made privy to information which proved the existence of a very incriminating and disturbing video.

Angela: This is serious news so I just pray that your heart is all protected and so on. I met with some people that I completely trust like I trust you and I trust Rupert, and I’ve known for almost two years. And what I didn’t know, they were trying to arrange a meeting with me for quite a while, and I didn’t have the money to fly and meet them, and I didn’t know it was important, right?

But what I found out was that they were part of breaking up a paedophile ring in Belgium a few years ago. They’ve done everything that we’re trying to do in Hampstead in London, and they succeeded, but they…there was some death threats and it was a bit scary, like it is at the minute, but…

So they would only meet me face to face, and tell me what they had to tell me, and so that finally happened a couple of weeks ago, and we had to go away from wifi and all that stuff, it was all very James Bond, but I believe them. And they said that somebody known to them had been paid £3,000 to hack Ella’s and [RD’s] computers, and laptops, this was I think about a year ago, maybe nine months ago. And unfortunately, Ella’s involved.

Jake: Yeah…

Angela: They found—are you okay with hearing the details, or would you rather not?

Jake: Yeah, I would….

Angela: All right, they found a video of Ella masturbating a child to sleep. I can’t remember if it was [redacted] because I went into such shock, and I wasn’t allowed to take notes…I mean, I kind of on one level I suspected it, but when you hear it, black and white, and you know that person is telling the truth….The story they told me was that there was video evidence of Ella masturbating a very young [child], there was video and written evidence of Ella and [RD] cooperating on snuff movies, there was–the main part of the ring, we thought it was mainly a paedophile ring, it’s not, it’s a Russian mafia drug cartel.

Jake: Yeah.

Angela: Bringing in drugs to London from a place called Krokodil in Russia, which is next to Afghanistan, and Pakistan and Uzbekistan, it’s all where heroin comes from.

Jake: Yeah, there’s a drug known as krokodil, it’s sending people mad…

Angela: Oh! You’ve got to…right, I’ve got to do my research on that then, because they were bringing that to England, and this whole cartel was distributing drugs, child pornography, and snuff movies. And Ella and Abraham were both…not Abraham, Ella and [RD] were both involved, and then somebody got murdered, and [RD] ripped Ella off for £260,000. And so Ella, she got the children to testify against [RD]—I mean, the children are telling the truth, although they may have left out some little bits about Ella, but she got the children to testify against [RD] and left the country, to teach him a lesson for ripping her off.

So the new score was:

1. RD: Bad.
2. Ella: Just as bad.
3. Abraham: Unwitting dupe.

Angela adds further detail, grasses up ‘informant’

Seven months later, in April 2017, Angela released the name of her alleged “impeccable informant” during a Skype conversation with Heather Brown:

Angela: Before we spoke, I was saying my prayers and I actually am ready to say who gave me, in September last year, the intelligence that Ella’s device had been hacked, for the modest price of £3,000, and that two videos in particular were found on her device—one of a woman masturbating (a male child) aged about 3, and although it wasn’t conclusive that it was Ella, it certainly indicated such, and the other video was of a disabled boy—this was a snuff movie which Ella was also alleged to have been complicit in distributing—it was a disabled boy being raped and sodomised and then set on fire by RD. Ugh, Jesus Christ. So I’ve taken the heat…

Heather: Did you see these alleged movies?

A: No, no, the person that gave me the intel last September, and had been trying to give it to me for at least six months, said that it had been reported to MI6, the evidence had been given to MI6, MI6 had said off the record that they would put surveillance on both Abe and…on both RD and Ella, and…

H: Why would MI6 be looking into this, because this is all in the UK? 

A: No, you see…no, you see…I know, but the thing is, it’s becoming more and more clear, somebody with Pizzagate, a supposed CIA insider, said that the reason the Americans were dragging their feet about fully exposing Pizzagate was because it could bring the British establishment down. I think it’s become very clear that Hampstead—

H: Well, who told you this? Tell us the name of the people.

A: Well I’m going to do, right? 

H: Yeah.

A: And this is not done flippantly. So I’ll just give you some background first: the person that gave me the intel is married to somebody who predominantly lives in Saudi Arabia. He’s the child of an Anglo-Iranian parentage. His father was in the Royal Air Force for a long time, and he was married to a woman from Iran, and his father was I think dishonourably discharged from the Royal Air Force after quite a lot of long-time service, and I don’t know if it was on espionage grounds, or I can’t remember grounds that his father was dishonourably discharged, but anyway, when his father was discharged from the Royal Air Force, he then became a spy. You know the way they’ll fire you, and then they’ll instantly re-recruit you—“Right, we know you’ve been fired, but we’ll give you 200 grand or whatever it is to now go underground and be one of our assets”. So this person, her father-in-law was alleged to have been—well he was definitely ex-Royal Air Force, he was definitely married to an Iranian woman, and he was alleged to have gone over after being dishonourably discharged, he was alleged to have then been recruited as a spy. The son, who’s probably 40, works mostly in Saudi Arabia, and I just pray in Jesus’ name that the offspring, the children are protected, but the son’s name is [redacted], and his wife’s name, who is my source, the intel that I was given, is [redacted]. She goes on Facebook by [redacted]. 

H: Never heard of her. 

A: Well, she was interviewed along with myself by Melanie Abbott…

H: Never heard of her.

A: Well, this is Hampstead going back more than two years ago. She and I were both interviewed by Melanie Abbot of the BBC Radio 4, thinking that we were Hampstead residents, which we weren’t. She lives in [redacted], he lives and works in Saudi Arabia, his father is ex-Royal Air Force, married to an Iranian, and alleged by [redacted] to have been recruited by MI6 after his air force career ended. So the thing that gave me the courage to release her name was that Kristen Elizabeth, the one that said when she was blocked by Kris Costa, it synchronistically blocked her from Sheva Burton, she said to me that she had defended Kris Costa to the moon and back because she didn’t want Kris’ children targeted, and it’s the same with [redacted], she and [redacted] have a child who’s very adorable, but I’ve protected her since September, and my children have been targeted, and here’s me protecting her. Now she hung me out to dry. She gave me this intel, in September—

H: But how does she know this thing anyway? 

A: From her husband, and from the MI6 contact.

H: Well why would they tell her?

A: Because she is the wife of an agent!

H: Are they not supposed to keep everything secret?

A: Well, they’re not supposed to tell their wives, but isn’t it true that, you know, that’s how the most old-fashioned spying ever went on…

H: (inaudible)

A: Pillow talk. Exactly. But this is where it broke down because her husband gave her, you know…her husband didn’t like her being involved with researching Hampstead. So he allegedly paid somebody three grand to go and hack RD and Ella’s devices. The devices turned out that it was to do with drugs, it was to do with the Russian mafia, and that Ella had pimped the children from a young age, and that Ella was furious because RD stiffed her for £240,000. [I thought it was £260,000, but who’s counting?—Ed.]

H: Well where’s the £240,000 now, then?

A: Well apparently, RD was too greedy, and the Russian mafia were paying RD commission, but he was taking the commission, and then he would take more than the commission, and then he was pimping the children at school secretly, without Ella’s knowledge, and then she felt like she’d been stiffed of £240,000, and so she blew the whistle on him. So although…this is all allegedly…although I don’t think she was as complicit, I do think the Russian drug cartel side of things might have been her side of the business, and that she was definitely a co-director with RD, with, it was supposed to be health and nutrition websites, but they were porn and snuff distribution websites. But I just want you to say on camera what you thought you’d seen Abra—now, I must just say this first, let me just say this first, the intel [redacted], aka [redacted] gave me, was that ironically the innocent person in this whole drama was Abraham. 

H: No, I don’t believe…I wouldn’t think so.

A: Well she said, according to the MI6 investigation, MI5, MI6, whatever, was that RD was the most guilty, Ella was pretty dirty in the involvement, and Abraham was just the petty crook who got—he was going to be a patsy. Abraham was intended to be the patsy. He was just a small-time drug dealer, had some anger management issues, and then the part you told me off-camera last time, possibly a pimp.

Revised score:

1. RD: Very, very bad
2. Ella: Not quite as complicit
3. Abe: Possibly a pimp or something, was intended to be the patsy

Angela continued to peddle this version of the story, more or less, for several months.

Flip forward to August 2018…

And then, the police raid and interview happened. Perhaps the shock of it erased some of Angela’s memories. or maybe her MK Ultra handlers implanted the idea that if she tried to tell the police that she had known of a potential child sex abuse/snuff film for the past two years, but that it had slipped her mind to let them know, things might not go well for her.

Whatever, this is what she said in her interview with Jason “Thicko” Goodman on his “Crowdsourcing the Truth” video on Tuesday:

Angela: It was a girl and a boy, a brother and sister, disclosed on video camera to their mother’s partner horrific Satanic ritual abuse in a school and a church and other locations in Hampstead…

And then when they went through all the proper steps, they went to a family police member and then to the police, and the children were taken off them, and five days later the children so say retracted with a police interview.

And since then, the Independent Police Complaints Commission upheld a complaint that the detective seemed to be leading the children in their retractions. And the little boy, although the little girl seemed to retract satisfactorily although it was agonising to watch, you know, it was night and day between the original disclosures and the retractions, But the little boy never fully retracted, he just couldn’t find it in him to fully—you know, he just didn’t have the cult distance to fully retract, no matter how much he was induced to.

So the mother fled the country with her partner, and in absentia she was framed in my opinion and none of the abusers were arrested, no crime scenes were sealed off, a consultant doctor confirmed that the children’s injuries both to…well, I’ll just say it, anal and vaginal injuries were consistent with the disclosures the children had made. …

As I say, none of the alleged crime sites were sealed, at that time the only person to have been interviewed amongst…I think there were 14, at least 14 abusers named, maybe much more, the only one that was spoken to was the father, by invitation without caution, about one incident.

Jason: What is an interview without caution?

Angela: He was just invited in for a chat. And he didn’t have his technology taken. Given the severity and the detail of the allegations, it warranted an absolutely high-level, incredibly thorough investigation. The other thing that was glaring was the children, a bit like Fiona Barnett, but they were only eight and nine, they drew drawings of their abusers and very distinguishing marks. Birthmarks, body piercings, tattoos…it was absolutely there for the investigating, and it in my opinion was swiftly covered up. The mother and the boyfriend were in my opinion framed for being…for having coached the children.

Now there’s 34 videos of the children, I think 19 of them were the original disclosures, and if you could coach the children to the level of disclosure that they made, which included not just being mass abused, but being given cocaine, given alcohol, given injections, witnessing Satanic rituals, witnessing murders, the detail was so intensive that it absolutely warranted crime scenes being sealed and all the alleged abusers having their tech taken and…

JG: Questioned.

APD: So then they had the fact-finding mission, they had the mother run out of the country, we had a very swift cover-up, and then since then, people have been campaigning worldwide. The videos were seen by about a hundred million people worldwide.

So there you have it: suddenly we’re back to square one.

New score:

1. RD: very bad (as always)
2. Ella: completely innocent, victimised by police and courts
3. Abraham: Not really mentioned except in a minor supporting role

No Russian drug  cartels from a town called Krokodil which is next to Afghanistan, and Pakistan and Uzbekistan, it’s all where heroin comes from. 

No more talk of Ella participating in making a child sex abuse video. No more £240,000 (or £260,000, take your pick) rip-offs. All of that has been forgotten, despite its having come from an “impeccable informant” with a husband in MI6 (or possibly MI5, not quite sure there).

Granted, Angela still clings to some of the allegations from the September 2016 version of the story: she claimed as recently as Monday that RD is

an alleged paedophile, an alleged cult leader, an alleged Satanic ritual abuser, an alleged porn and snuff movie distributor, an alleged international drug distributor, ineffectively investigated in a different country, as backed up by the Independent Police Complaints Commission.

So it seems that despite her apparent return to Hampstead SRA hoax orthodoxy, she has incorporated elements of her various invented dramas, perhaps without remembering where they originated.

This is the problem with telling lies, Angela. Unless you have an excellent memory, you’re bound to trip over the inconsistencies sooner or later.