It’s been a while since Sabine poked her head above the parapet, though word has it that she’s been busily planning her triumphant 2017 come-back. Still we were surprised last week to discover that she’d re-posted an old chestnut from her “Whistleblower Kids” blog:
The Facebook post leads to this:
The “Whistleblower kids” of course refers to RD’s two children.
In doing this, of course, she is flagrantly violating the restraining order imposed upon her last July following her trial, with Neelu Berry, for conspiracy to commit witness intimidation. If you’ll recall, Sabine is not permitted to publish anything related to any person who “is or has been a pupil at Christ Church Primary School”.And the order is quite explicit, stating that this includes “by re-publication of material already made public before the making of this order”.
Surely even Sabine must be aware that she’s in violation of the order…so we wonder what she thinks she’s playing at here.
Rumours of a resurgence?
As we mentioned, we’ve been picking up rumours that Sabine is planning to resurrect the Hampstead SRA hoax. In a recent Sooper Seekrit Sabine-o-gram™ she stated,
2017 MUST become the Year of Breakthroughs we’ve been waiting for!
I am going forward with a whole bundle of documents, aiming at the four of us NOT being charged at the end of January and to get the Children returned during the course of the 2017!!!
Who are “the four of us”? At a guess we’d include Rupert, Neelu, Sabine, and…erm…a player to be named later. Given the number of people arrested last fall, your guess really is as good as ours.
Meanwhile, here’s a tip for Sabine: if you’re hoping to “not be charged” at the end of this month (or ever, really) it might be wise to stop violating your restraining order. The courts tend to look unfavourably on that sort of thing.
Just a thought.