They make this so easy, don’t they!
Apparently, preventing a school from being forced to do something is the same as blocking a school from doing something. LOL
Incidentally, it already is obligatory for schools to report abuse and has been for several decades. But the four people who run Hampstead Research aren’t renowned for their researching skills. Why let the facts get in the way of a good hoax, eh?
HOAXTEAD RESEARCH 
Hi! Can I be Agent 99? (I’d rather be Emma Peel, but I don’t have the build…)
Like the conspiranoid True Believers of many other issues, these Hampstead Hoax Cultists are impervious to reality and fact. That’s because they don’t actually care what the truth is, they only care about propagation of their pet memes. I did try sharing some facts with Jacqui, in a respectful manner, but was ignored.
The vids of these unfortunate children “disclosing”, are all very obviously a result of abusive coaching by Ella and Abraham. Things like, the two children responding to Ella & Abraham’s questions with precisely the same sentences – and in tandem even! – can only be practiced responses. This is just common sense, but there is also support for this interpretation from professional Child Sexual Abuse victim interviewers.
I accidently viewed the beginning of one of the police interviews with the boy, (those annoying youtube video clusters that automatically play the next video in a “stack”), and something very significant was immediately apparent. The boy aggressively volunteers graphic details of abuse, and frequently details not directly solicited by the interviewer as well as details not related to the subject of the interviewer’s question. There is no evidence of embarrasment or distress from the boy as he relates these alleged experiences.
Most people are probably unaware that such spontaneous disclosure and lack of obvious embarrassment is VERY UNUSUAL for genuinely abused children in police interviews. There is a very important study on this subject, titled: “Why Didn’t They Tell Us?”, which examines the interview responses of 23 children, from toddlers to teens, whose abuse experiences are documented in pornographic photos and videos of them made by their abusers. The police have these materials, but haven’t disclosed this fact to the children prior to the interviews. This paragraph nicely summarizes what typically happens:
“Some of the twenty-three children have talked about the sexual abuse with their mothers when they were called for interview or when social services contacted the family. This had happened after direct questions from the mothers. At the police interviews, the twenty-three children faced a special situation since the interviewers had substantiating material in the form of video films or photographs, where it was evident thatWhen children did not reply to the interviewer’s direct questions, sometimes the interviewer would refer to what was shown in the photographs or the films.
Children, then, only talked thoroughly about those incidents that the interviewer knew about – whether as a result of photographs or owing to what the suspected perpetrator had themselves talked about. When the interviewer did not refer to substantiating material that showed what the children had been subjected to, most of the children did not talk about anything”.
LikeLike