There we were, having a nice civilised discussion about being nice civilised people, when next thing you know, KABLAM! We are slapped between the eyes by a post on Angela Power-Disney’s Facebook page, accusing us…well, not exactly us, probably someone else now that we think of it, of…actually, we’re not completely sure what we (or they) are being accused of, but whatever it is, it isn’t nice. Or civilised.
Even more odd that to our knowledge, we’ve never written a single post, complimentary, derogatory, or otherwise, about the person doing the complaining.
However, you know Hoaxtead mobsters. They can never be accused of letting facts stand in the way of a good rant. Or, as it happens, a very bad rant.
All right, so first Mary would like to establish a few basic facts.
- She is not an open-minded person.
- She is also not a narrow-minded person.
- She seems to think of herself as a “little goldilocks self”, which conjures an odd image for a supposedly grown woman, but who are we to complain? [Sez the coyote—Ed.]
- Oh wait, sorry. She’s actually a very broadminded person. Broad but not open. Got it.
Here’s where it gets tricky. See if you can follow along:
Theres alot of sh*t starters in this world that function under the ASSumption that because I dont happen to lack clearly defined boundaries or share their viewpoint, then this must mean I’m open for their targeted attacks and wont bother to do anything.
Here’s our best attempt: “Some people believe that because Mary doesn’t lack (in other words, she does have) clearly defined boundaries, or share their viewpoints, this means she’s open for”…no, wait, that’s not right.
Actually, we have no idea what she means.
Also, anyone have a clue what a “fake ass” profile is? We’re thinking pseudonymous donkey, but this one’s up for grabs.
Smile and nod, people. Smile and nod.
Okay, so having said that her non-lack of clearly defined boundaries doesn’t mean that she can’t accept whatever it was she was talking about back there, she now says that whatever we didn’t think we weren’t reading was 100% WRONG.
Fine, no problem. Let’s move along.
By the way, does anyone happen to have any paracetamol?
We’re glad to hear that Mary laughs about bullsh*t. So do we. Isn’t that nice? We have something in common!
Ah, but apparently she doesn’t like it when the bullsh*t has nothing to do with her. She only likes self-referential bullsh*t, then? Noted.
And oh, dearie dearie dear…it seems that Mary thinks someone has been attacking her because she’s been defending someone else who’s been a repeated target of some other attacks…my goodness, that sounds terrible! Who could do such a dastardly thing?
Whoever it is should be vewy, vewy careful, because Mary thinks that publishing her diatribe on Facebook is the equivalent to nailing it to the cathedral doors: it counts as a public notice, which means that whoever she thinks she’s talking to ought to be aware of it.
Then she says something about how “ibed anonymous persons” who may or may not have been “unwitteningly enticed”, which quite frankly is a bit too much information for us.
Really, what she chooses to do in the privacy of her own home is none of our business. And she may entice whoever she likes, unwitteningly or otherwise, just so long as she and the anonymous persons don’t do it in the street and frighten the horses.
Ah, we think we might finally be getting to the meat of the matter. Mary wants someone called “Hoaxstead Research” to CEASE AND DESIST from their “persistent actions”. What actions would those be? Beats us.
Like many of the unwitteningly challenged folk who have promoted the Hampstead SRA hoax in the complete absence of any evidence that such a thing exists, Mary seems to believe that she is being harassed, emailed, spammed, and trolled…and she won’t have it, do you hear?
It seems those dastardly folk at “Hoaxstead Research”, whoever they are, have unwitteningly driven poor Mary to utter distraction, and if they don’t stop doing whatever it is they’ve been doing, she is going to call a policeman and tell her mummy and they’ll be sorry then, won’t they?
Oh, but Mary, while she might be a non-openminded, non-narrowminded, possibly non-broadminded person, is nonetheless not minded to contact the authorities (yet). She is giving those bad people ONE FINAL CHANCE to cease their illegal activities, yadda yadda yadda allegedly and without prejudice, world without end, amen.
Well, we’re sure that’ll be a huge relief to the nasty people over at “Hoaxstead Research”, whoever they may be.
As for those of us here at Hoaxtead Research, we don’t think we’ve much to worry about:
Living Next Door To Mary
Sally called when she got the word
And she said: “I suppose you’ve heard
About Mary
When I rushed to the window
And I looked outside
And I could hardly believe my eyes
As a big limousine rolled up
Into Mary’s drive…….who the fcuk is Mary!
LikeLiked by 3 people
Sounds to me like Woody’s begging for attention. Must be a lonely existence being Angela’s last remaining fan. LOL
LikeLiked by 2 people
Exactly what I thought Angiewatch.
I don’t know the woman and she doesn’t sound very interesting to me.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Shit, we’ve finished her off! 😮
LikeLike
Oh bugger, that would have made so much more sense if I’d remembered to include the bloody screenshot!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Mary, don’t flatter yourself, luv. Who the feck would want to waste their time trolling you? You’re not even a hasbeen – you’re a neverwas!
LikeLiked by 2 people
I’ve never heard of her but I’m sure she’s a very nice person. 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ll tell Angela what’s “good for lungs”.
DO NOT SMOKE.
LikeLiked by 3 people
LikeLiked by 1 person
LikeLiked by 1 person
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh, Mary–you and I need to have a wee chat about the correct uses of “who” and “whom”. No guarantees, but a grammar tutorial could make the difference between “incomprehensible gibberish” and “annoying prattle” on your next rant at people who’ve never heard of you.
LikeLike
Yes, I noticed that she had unwitteningly used the wrong one.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, she sounds like a fabulous conversationalist, for starters. 😁
LikeLike
Absolutely. Interesting woman and such a lovely Bergmanesque photograph.
LikeLiked by 1 person
A hint of mystery, echoed in the inscrutability of her writing.
LikeLike
Has it all clicked into place now? Bwahahahahaha! 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
😂
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ve never trolled Woody but I confess that I did do a spot of graffiti on the wall of her house at the weekend.
LikeLiked by 2 people
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ooh, nice!
LikeLiked by 1 person
LikeLiked by 1 person
We’ll never know but I wonder what would have happened with the case above if Angela and Tracey “left field” Morris hadn’t got involved?
Would the funeral today be taking place?
If I was those 2 I’d be questioning myself but hey Angela for sure won’t and I’m not sure about Tracey.
Trouble is always around when Angela sticks her big size 10’s in…
LikeLiked by 3 people
And Tracey’s death threat against the the social worker can’t have helped either.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That could mean, she won’t be walking away from this without suffering some consequences, i.e. job reprimand etc. though it could mean she’s going to get her ankles, legs, back broken etc.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I wish I had your optimism, Babs.
Mind you, maybe she’s just going to just chase her across the garden and beat her up, like she did to Gerry Adams 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
If Angie did question herself how could she be sure the answers were the truth?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Mmm I’m not sure if Angela is oblivious to the grief she causes to all she knows and lots she doesn’t know…
Or she gets her rocks off on it.
A bit of both probably. I’m not sure in what ratio.
As for Tracey “left field” Morris, yeah maybe she does mean giving whoever the Gerry Adams treatment.
Silly woman she is, he was probably scared of her shrieking voice and couldn’t get away quick enough.
Who could blame him?
That’s if the tale is even true.
I really don’t know anymore.
If in doubt believe nought.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Blimey, Mad Moo’s really working her way through those in-house paggas, isn’t she:
She seems to forget that only last week she was enthusiastically promoting Green’s antisemitic posts! Nice back-pedalling, Debs.
Oh and pssst: it won’t work as long as you’re denying the Holocaust, mocking Jews who lament the people who died in it, promoting other antisemitic psychos, openly supporting the EDL and BNP and rabidly praising Hitler’s favourite book ‘The Protocols of the Elders of Zion’.
Oh and while we’re on race bigotry (or ‘bigatory’, as you hilariously spell it), moaning about there being too many black taxi drivers in Sheffield ins’t helping your ’cause’ either. Just saying.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Psst…Peter Green = John Paterson. You heard it here first.
LikeLike
Yes, I’d figured that one due to the emblem that he uses on all his FB accounts. Nasty little person.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Pity about the schnozzola.
*snicker*
LikeLiked by 2 people
Not to be confused with his far more likable namesake of Fleetwood Mac fame.
LikeLiked by 2 people
LikeLiked by 1 person
…And I’m here to take the piss out of you for it, Debs. Nothing personal 😀
LikeLiked by 2 people
Which child? I want a name!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Fred. His name is Fred.
LikeLike
We don’t know his real name, Mrs. Overall. The authorities refer to him simply as Child Z.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Sorry Mary Woody but that Cease @ Desist post is not Lawful Notice.
LikeLiked by 1 person
But is it compliant with EU directives? And do we fully satisfy the arrest criteria? Inquiring minds wish to know.
LikeLiked by 1 person
If EC isn’t careful he’ll find himself subject to a 5 trillion pound lien.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Headless chicken update:
LikeLiked by 1 person
No lics to bussine? Shit, this is serious!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Mary’s views on fat people:
LikeLiked by 1 person
From Private Eye 1452, 09.09.17 – 21.09.17
LikeLiked by 1 person
Following on from yesterday’s – frankly more relevant theme, and reflecting on the clip from Private Eye shown above… I think it’s high time there were serious repercussions for those that fabricate – or even just threaten to fabricate – allegations of sexual assault; and by serious I mean a considerable mandatory jail sentence.
I stress that I don’t mean anything should be done to discourage genuine victims from reporting. But where, for instance, someone blatantly threatens that they will create a false rape threat – or as in the Hampstead case they create a bizarre story so ludicrous it cannot possibly hold water; then, on conviction, that person should face a minimum non-concurrent one year in jail. they should also be exposed in the press and have to pay their victim a serious level of compensation.
False accusation, or even the threat of it, can have a devastating effect on the person who is targeted by these scumbags. Clearly, anyone who does such a thing – even at the casual ‘trolling’ level is of a completely unhinged, amoral and criminal mindset – yet there seems to be very little by way of a book that can actually be thrown at them!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree with most of what you say. I just worry that the long game plan of some of the people involved in this and other hoaxes is to make all claims of sexual abuse seem incredible. If all accusations of child abuse become associated with ludicrous fantasies then certain food gurus, minor historians and flying vets can get up to their grubby low level antics without fear.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Well… I’m one of a group of people who do strongly believe that, one of the key purposes of the hoaxes that have emerged over the past 7-8 years or so is indeed to act as a distraction from the realities of organised child sexual abuse. And I grow daily more convinced that what I’ve often heard called the ‘McKenzie Industries set’ have direct links to that activity, although I stress that hey are by no means the only ones.
To be clear here… I’m talking about people who make wild accusations such as the ‘Nick’ character, or Christie… Or even someone who messages someone threatening to fabricate a rape threat and then distribute it; perhaps even we should consider things like doxing in that list? Because even fake allegations cause real damage to innocent people.
If (and I think they do) CSA ‘rings’ exist, they consist mainly of grubby little men living grubby little lives sating their filthy appetites reading dirty stories and trading in dirty pictures and videos. But in at the back of that has to be a network of individuals who are carrying out the abuse and distributing the material; every now and then one slips up so badly they have to be convicted. – There are genuinely, cases where its been found that individuals in positions of influence and authority have been directly involved in such activities. And others where perverts have been convicted and it’s been discovered the authorities knew about them for decades but did nothing to either bring them to book or prevent them offending further.
Given that high profile/high level individuals are in the minority of the general population, what exactly is the point of directing the main light of suspicion onto that group particularly? Certainly, you do have the Jimmy Saviles and Jonathan Kings of this world to deal with and there is no doubt they should have been dealt with sooner…
But what a neat distraction all that is from the probable realities – especially when it’s dressed up in puerile nonsense about ‘Satanic rituals’ and Mr Minit’s sideline in baby-skin footwear! Oh! and let’s not forget the messages from Lord Ashtray, light beings and where you can get a new bulb for your astral projector! Rhetorically speaking, isn’t it ‘odd’ how so much of this stuff tracks back to stoners, drug dealers, grifters, con merchants, and the general criminal fraternity? And isn’t it odd how you can join dots between that group and so many convicted paedophiles?
LikeLiked by 1 person
About time Rainer Kurz came under scrutiny. Him and Sabine are linked too.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well, colour me shocked.
LikeLike
Mary rather reminds me of a drunk woman I saw in the street with her boyfriend.
Woman: “They’re all looking at me!”
Boyfriend: “No they aren’t, don’t worry.”
Woman (shouts): “THEY’RE ALL LOOKING AT ME! THEY’RE ALL LOOKING AT ME! THEY’RE ALL LOOKING AT ME! …”
And indeed, though they weren’t really interested, so they were!
LikeLike
As a follower of this BS since the beginning I have to ask….
Who the fcuk is Mary Woody?
LikeLiked by 3 people
I have to agree with Jack Burton…
I have never seen a single post about this ‘Mary Woody’ anywhere on this blog
Now of course there are plenty, and I no doubt there will be more, as stupidity of this level rarely just occurs once, so I have no doubt ‘Mary’ will provide us with much mirth in the future…
To paraphrase Fairly Sane
Mary: “They’re all looking at me!”
Hoaxtead: “No we aren’t, don’t worry.”
MARY (shouts): “THEY’RE ALL LOOKING AT ME! THEY’RE ALL LOOKING AT ME! THEY’RE ALL LOOKING AT ME! …”
And indeed, though we weren’t really interested, so we were!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Very true, by posting what she did, she is insinuating herself into a hoax which has been discredited by lawful means. I find this very relevant to the discussions here.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It seems that the cult of believers now believe that any one not agreeing with them is a member of Hoaxtead and is acting on its behalf.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I wish Mary Woody would at least spell HOAXTEAD correctly, grrr…
LikeLiked by 3 people
A thousand likes.
Marry me, Babs.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m already married Spiny but thanks for the proposal.
LikeLiked by 1 person
If APD is going to the funeral she would need to get her skates on – Via A1
148.5 km (show in miles)
1 hr 52 mins
Or is the UK out of bounds for her?
I am sure she will have a post later declaring herself chief mourner if she does happen to go.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Angie’s airing her one of her son’s dirty laundry in public again. Forgive me for not posting the screenshots but I don’t think it would be fair on him
LikeLiked by 1 person
and blaming “bent cops”, doing their job, and doing it very well at that.
LikeLiked by 2 people
She’d be the first to complain if someone without insurance crashed into her and she was left to foot the bill.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Don’t do drugs, kids.
LikeLiked by 1 person
There’s a special kind of stupid going on here…
LikeLiked by 1 person
I see Patrick “disappeared” did he?
What strange world are you living in Angie? Nothing you have said makes any sense at all.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I can help. See here, clause 30.
https://www.bl.uk/magna-carta/articles/magna-carta-english-translation
LikeLike
“One of my sons has a 1,000 Euro fine for driving with no #insurance due to be paid TOMORROW…any advice?”
Yeah Angie… PAY YOUR FOOKIN WAY! Your son’s obviously an irresponsible idiot like yourself, the reason insurance is COMPULSORY is that innocent people get killed and maimed everyday by eijits behind the wheel of motor vehicles, and the insurance is to provide for the potential damage that can be done to an innocent family’s lives – not that you’ve ever given a fuck about that you evil old cow! – As for your shite about ‘horse power’; Bollocks! Literally, bollocks! – You fucking brain dead non-educated nutjob!
LikeLiked by 3 people
LikeLiked by 1 person
Why’s Angela asking now with only 1 day to go before the money needs to be paid?
Hasn’t she asked Neelu for advice? ROFLMAO.
Can’t she ask Belinda for a loan?
How about setting up a GoFundMePage for Mr. Irresponsible?
Oh dear!
Angela shouldn’t have given that 1000 Euros to Rupert.
Perhaps she could write to him and ask for the money back?
LikeLiked by 2 people
It seems Angela has phoned the court and sorted it for the naughty boy.
Very strange, he should have rang himself.
Both those sons of hers are over 18.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Latest figures on Garda deployment in your area Angela:
Meath 30 April 2016: Total = 283
Division District Station
Members
MEATH ASHBOURNE ASHBOURNE
49
DULEEK
4
DUNBOYNE
17
DUNSHAUGHLIN
17
LAYTOWN
21
ASHBOURNE Total
108
KELLS BAILE ÁTHA BUÍ
5
KELLS
39
OLDCASTLE
3
KELLS Total
47
NAVAN NAVAN
83
NOBBER
4
SLANE
4
NAVAN Total
91
TRIM BALLIVOR
2
ENFIELD
4
LONGWOOD
1
SUMMERHILL
2
TRIM
28
TRIM Total
37
Did you get that? 3 Garda in your area! Makes perfect sense then that they can do 24/7 surveillance on you, just in case you or someone in your family who are being ‘targeted’, should at a moment’s notice decide to break the law!
Shame on you for trying to twist this to suit your usual BS agenda!
No one is above the law, in the first place your son should not be driving without insurance & the fact that you actually asked him to do so, shame on you!
LikeLiked by 1 person
LikeLike
Fuck you Christine you evil bitch. My niece and nephew are catholic.
LikeLiked by 1 person
And they don’t worship the pope. Fanatic.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Stupid cow. Catholics especially in this part of the world are quite secular in outlook. I should know seeing as I was brought up catholic and went to catholic schools.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pure scum.
LikeLiked by 1 person
LikeLiked by 1 person
I would not be surprised to learn one day that Christine had been sectioned. Can’t come too soon, if you ask me.
LikeLiked by 1 person
In a lot of her posts she’s declared herself God. She’s like a female ****** and I suspect that she is very lonely. Even her fellow troofers and Bible-thumpers generally give her a wide berth.
LikeLike
In those videos of her at Christchurch she sounds like someone who has had a stroke and the brain has been starved of oxygen. I know a girl who had a fit and banged her head and ended up like that. It was sad to see her go from a vibrant young woman to someone who could barely speak.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I remember speculating, that many Western ISIS recruits – ones who had viewed their propaganda – were probably quietly psychopathic and hoping to inflict pain & suffering on others.
I took a lot of flak for that, from some folk who insisted they must all be total innocents and simply “brainwashed”. Well…
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4865326/Female-ISIS-torturer-describes-horrors-inflicted.html
LikeLiked by 2 people
That is truly disturbing JS. Thank you for posting that link. .
LikeLike
Evening all. How’s tricks?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ah, how lovely. More defamation to add to Debs’ record sheet.
It’s a pity that Kristie Sue has no idea how much hot water she’s helping her UK friends get into, isn’t it?
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ve heard New Hall Women’s Prison Wakefield is lovely at this time of year. Ay oop!
LikeLike
My comment earlier: “Angie’s airing her one of her son’s dirty laundry in public again. Forgive me for not posting the screenshots but I don’t think it would be fair on him.”
For the record, I stand by that, even if I’m (apparently) in a minority. Correct me if I’m wrong but haven’t we always had a policy of keeping hoaxers’ families out of things unless they involve themselves directly in Hampstead stuff etc?
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m with you on that, AW.
And for the record, I also stand by my astonishing claim that not all teachers are implicit in covering up child abuse (including those at Christ Church).
A certain person has much to answer for as regards inappropriate comments (and those are just two examples).
LikeLike
That’s right. We do our best to keep families separate.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree, I’m truly sorry if my post above comes under the policy of not keeping families out of it & I really would be happy to see it amended.
LikeLike
LikeLiked by 2 people
Check the description.
LikeLiked by 2 people
We attacked his free speech? Wow, I had no idea. He seems very distressed about it, doesn’t he?
LikeLike
Another ignoramus who doesn’t get the difference between free speech and defamation. *Sigh*
Except when we exercise our free speech about him, of course. That’s not allowed, lol.
LikeLike
Perhaps Titus should be looking elsewhere for who to blame.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Their insistence that ET and DLV were one and the same – when they couldn’t look or sound more different – was one more thing that showed Abe & Ella up as the drooling morons that they are.
LikeLike
Abe also said this in part of another of his comments recently.
LikeLiked by 1 person
So…Titus, blame Hampstead hoaxers, NOT Hoaxtead Research for your livestream demise.
LikeLiked by 1 person
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nice to see someone exposing Titarse but the guy does himself no favours by siding with flat-earthers.
LikeLiked by 1 person
No, plus frankly I am a fan of Space-X. That’s some interesting shit right there.
LikeLike
I posted the wrong video, sorry. Any chance that can be removed?
LikeLike
PM me the correct link and I’ll amend it if you like 🙂
LikeLike
“Added later” video is hilarious! 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
“It was the Satanic Temple affiliated ‘Hoaxsteders’ who flagged my channel and got my live stream suspended for three months. This is blatant censorship and I will not tolerate it.”
Won’t tolerate it? And what the fuck’s he gonna do about it? LOL
And what the hell is this trend among hoaxers and troofers of blaming HR for everything? Should we be flattered? 😀
And for Christ’s sake, why is it beyond the capabilities of these twunts to spell ‘Hoaxtead’ correctly? Sorry but that one’s a matter of pride 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yeah, the whole thing is a bit weird. Apparently we have awesome mystical powers to shut down the wankers…so powerful are we, that we can do this without even being aware of it. FEAR US.
Or something.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I don’t know what you expect. The first three letters of his name are ‘Tit’ after all.
LikeLiked by 1 person
MKD, El Coyote and I all get mentioned in this one. I don’t even know who the guy is. I’ve never even heard of him, lol.
LikeLiked by 1 person
yeah, why would he mention you? lol
LikeLiked by 2 people
He’s a friend of Echo. What made him think anyone from here reported his livestream? I don’t even watch his videos.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Nor do I. Sounds like he’s looking around for someone to blame, and our name came up.
LikeLike
because someone shared your tweet, you are now a Satanist?
The only paedo protectors are those promoting hoaxes that make it harder victims to come forward and be taken seriously. You won’t see any of that here, in fact the exact opposite. I think Titus should maybe realise there are many anti-child abuse campaigners on here, as well as people who have been the victim of abuse.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I did watch his one from yesterday, saying that he’d got a ban from his livestream but that was because someone sent me the link!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Titarse is from Salem. Nuff said?
LikeLike
Ah, I see he’s calling us Satanists and paedophiles, so he’s hardly helping himself. There goes my sympathy for the slanderous wanker.
And as for the Satanic bloody Temple, not only does it have nothing to do with us but I for one couldn’t even find it on a fecking map!
LikeLiked by 1 person
What a wally. Moans about not deserving to have his videos taken down, then slanders us all over the shop!
LikeLiked by 1 person
This is fucking hilarious. Apart from the fact he never mentioned me! “ive exposed Hampstead was a hoax” What a wanker, his speech at pizzagate started off about Hampstead even though he hadn’t researched it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
This is great! He’s declared war on us. the first shot across the bow! Its gonna be like last summer all over again. Yeah!!!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Is this Titarse Frost? I didn’t recognise him from his new user name.
I’ve never had nowt to do with him either way.
Did I just say ‘nowt’? I hope that’s Barchon’s influence and not Mad Moo’s 😀
LikeLiked by 2 people
I fuck with him a bit but only now and again. He’s losing it
LikeLiked by 1 person
He has realised Abe and Ella’s claims are a Satanic Hoax, ever since Echo’s videos on Hampstead came out, so why would Hoaxtead report one of his livestream videos? He’s not making sense.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Let me see if I’ve understood this freedom of speech thing correctly: Titarse is allowed to slander us but we’re not allowed to defend ourselves. Is that about the size of it?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Actually, I think it’s more like “Titus is allowed to slander us, but we offend him by existing”. A true free-speech advocate, then.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ah, America. LOL
LikeLiked by 1 person
Waptek is very fond of him lol.
https://www.youtube.com/user/waptek0/search?query=titus
LikeLike
LikeLike
I was real nice to him!
I sent him an email warning him off a goose-chase he was wasting his time on, and showed him how to access the pedophilic “Free Spirits” wiki about themselves, instead. I even sent him an alert that some guy was broadcasting his real name on Youtube (at that time, I didn’t know he had disclosed it all over the place himself).
As far as I know, it’s not us Titus! Some Grima Wormtongue has probably been feeding him lies about us. (Perhaps a shit-for-brains that we are ignoring).
LikeLiked by 1 person
Justin. Shhh things have been a bit quiet since Rupert went down.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Went down on whom?
LikeLike
Don’t give me nightmares.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I hear a song coming on 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
LMAO! Oh shit, what have I started?
LikeLike
I don’t know mate, but I think it started in the kitchen and ended up in the bedroom 😉
LikeLike
One of my sons, who works as a cashier at the HSBC, has a 14 trillion euro fine for failing to honour a Swiss Indo bond for a Ms. Berry of Ilford and it’s due to be paid TOMORROW. Any advice?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pray to the spirit of the Great Disappeared Cullinane. He rewards the faithful.
LikeLiked by 1 person
We seem to be taking flak from all directions at the moment! A lot of moaning sods out there, aren’t there. As they would say, we must be doing something right.
Keep up the good work, EC and team 😀
LikeLike
I agree.
LikeLiked by 1 person