Last week we published a report by a Hoaxtead Research reader who attended Belinda McKenzie’s trial for contempt of court. It was this person’s observations about Belinda’s lawyer, Tom Davidson, and Belinda’s own statements, which set off our concerns about Belinda’s current employment—paid or otherwise—as Chambers Manager at a London law chambers.
This week, our Intrepid Reporter has come back with some additional observations, including some historical titbits which help place the current situation in context. Over to you, Intrepid Reporter!
In my last observations which EC published in respect of Belinda McKenzie’s trial, I highlighted the oddity of her defence counsel Tom Davidson’s statement that his client had carried out volunteer work for him.
It seems that someone picked up on this and made some investigations that revealed McKenzie is listed as his ”Chambers Manager”, and since EC published this information the reaction has been excellent. Even those who think she works for MI5 as an agent will have a field day with this one!
I obviously had my doubts when Davidson made the statement, which is why I included it in my article. It was almost said as an aside by him, a throwaway comment which he didn’t want to highlight, and he said it very quietly. It was as if it had just popped into his head, and he just wanted the judge to hear it, but nobody else.
This was the same man who certainly could be very vocal when in the mood. For example, he was heard shouting down the phone at McKenzie the day she was too scared to attend court: ”You will not get nine years!” He bellowed so loudly it could be heard well beyond the confines of the office he was in.
I also thought that despite the number of supporters McKenzie (and McNeill) have, not one of them came forward to act as a character witness. Was Davidson trying to bridge the gap, I wondered?
McKenzie claims 20 years or so of helping people, including many in Iran through her Iran Aid scam where she claimed she had to destroy documents and squirrel away millions of pounds to protect the identities of victims there. Surely some of those she helped there are safe now, and could speak out in support of her…if they exist, of course.
Where is the husband she claims to have? Closer to home, where are all those that she has helped in the UK? It seems that these so-called victims and supporters could not be bothered to put pen to paper or finger to keyboard for her. Some were in court, but were too idle to walk the 20 feet to the witness box and give testimony as to what a wonderful person they think she is?
The answer is simple. Her CV* is bankrupt, empty, void. There is nothing in there, After 20 years or so of ‘work’ she has nothing to show for it, save for the lives she has damaged, and a few imbeciles who she needs to prop her up and massage her ego and bank balance.
Thanks to EC and readers of this blog, between us we will do the due diligence that barrister Tom Davidson failed to do.
So let’s rewind a little. While we may never know what makes McKenzie tick, we do know that she has no interest in saving vulnerable children.
We know she is an anti-Establishment campaigner, and I believe this is her true crusade, but she knows that it is difficult to make a dent in a powerful system that is centuries old. [She might know this because it’s the demographic into which she was born—Ed.]
However, she has worked out that she can elicit support by using children, claiming they have been systematically raped by those in power, and alleging that these very same people then collude to cover up their crimes and keep the non-elites in the dark. This is the blueprint plan she has followed for many years.
We now know that in England in particular, there have been many ‘grooming gangs’; media reports have highlighted how long they have been able to operate with seeming impunity. One would think this was right up McKenzie’s street—the megaphone would be out, the banners, the leaflets, and she would do as she did in Aberdeen, campaigning in the area where she claimed the abuse was happening.
Indeed, a gang operated in Oxford, a city she is familiar with, and some would say very much part of the establishment. But no, not on her radar. Why?
Could it be that these grooming gangs were the wrong colour? Given her target was the establishment, the (mostly) men who committed these crimes were either brown immigrants, or sons of immigrants from Pakistan.
These criminals were not part of the Establishment. McKenzie’s targets are white people in powerful jobs as her back catalogue of behaviour demonstrates.
For those who are unaware, Hampstead in London is an affluent area where many wealthy people live. McKenzie and her cohorts wrongly assumed that because the school named was in Hampstead, the parents of the children must be wealthy. This fitted in with the profile of the people she wanted to target.
She was completely wrong. Christ Church Primary School is a state school, and many of the children had hard, ‘working class’ parents. Those with real wealth in the area send their children to private fee-paying schools, and this was not one of them.
But this was ignored. All McKenzie’s supporters could see was that some residents of Hampstead had more than they did. They wanted to punish them in one of the most severe and horrible ways imaginable.
Davidson’s place of work is a courtroom. As an officer of the court, how would he feel if his court were invaded by a feral mob who tried to arrest the judge?
This is what his Chambers Manager Belinda McKenzie did, though as usual, if there were a chance she might be arrested she would urge others to the front line. Like any good general, she stayed well to the rear.
In the clip below, you will see a brief glimpse of her at about 01:05. She is to the right of the screen. She is alongside her ‘Sabine’ of that period, the pathetic Robert Green. Like Sabine McNeill, he was another empty vessel who was so dim that for 19 years he was paying a mortgage on a building he didn’t even own.
He blamed the Establishment and everyone else for his stupidity. Again like Sabine, and as many will know, he too ended up in prison and was very fortunate that the sentencing guidelines were different from those faced by McNeill.
McNeill was just another of McKenzie’s protegées who receive a prison term. But let’s not forget that when she was on the run from the police and hid in Germany, McKenzie aided and abetted her by funding her. And let’s not also forget that she believed there was an Interpol arrest warrant of the more serious type of crime out for her, and yet McKenzie continued to fund her.
I say McKenzie funded her, but old habits die hard and she raided the coffers of her latest scam, The Knight Foundation (later the Knights and Angels Foundation), and redirected public donations meant to support abused children to her fugitive friend so she could evade justice.
She also helped fund American thug Rupert Quaintance’s trip to Hampstead, where he said he was going to kick down doors and take blood from alleged ‘cult members’. He got nine months in Wandsworth Prison for his efforts, and rather than kick down doors, was kicked himself, out of the country, after completion of his sentence.
The clip below, filmed in March 2011, shows Roger Hayes claiming to lead a group of people, including Belinda, in an attempt to arrest a judge.
Hayes is/was chairman of The British Constitution Group whose offices are listed at the same address as the equally barmy Brian Gerrish’s UK Column. Gerrish was also listed as a director of the group. Hayes was jailed for non-payment of council tax, which he viewed as an illegal charge implemented by the Establishment. [Quel surprise!—Ed.]
This is but a tiny example of the company Mckenzie keeps.
It seems, as has been pointed out by others, Mr Tom Davidson has invited a Trojan horse into his offices where McKenzie, given her title, must have access to extremely sensitive material involving children.
I would think that to be given such a position, her ability on a computer must be far greater that she led Judge Cahill to believe when she pleaded with her to be lenient when passing sentence.
Davidson likely would have helped McKenzie compose her ”Letter of regret”, a title he gave it rather than her, I’m sure. So it does raise the question, did Davidson know that her computer skills were far greater than the court was told, and that she did indeed know how to delete a post, while claiming she didn’t?
More to follow…
*CV: For McKenzie’s followers only. A CV (curriculum vitae) is something you have when you’ve had a job. It is a record of one’s work history and accomplishments. Hope this helps.