Hoax supporters react to Sabine McNeill sentence

It’s not as if this wasn’t wholly predictable: within minutes of the announcement of Sabine McNeill’s nine-year sentence being handed down, the first howls of rage were detected…all the way over in Greece.

Andy “Make Mine a Double” Devine was first out of the gate, slugging back the vino while expressing his outrage at Sabine’s sentence:

Hot on his heels was Angela Power-Disney, who was (almost) speechless with rage:

Not for long, though: within hours she’d thrown up a brief rant video which we won’t link here, as it violates the reporting restriction on Sabine’s trial. Suffice to say, she seemed a bit subdued—possibly having had a glimpse of her own future.

“Hello, RyanAir? Any flights to Lanzarote open?”

Neelu, meanwhile, was incoherent in her own special way: she erupted in the comments section of a Facebook post in which she’d urged people to attend Sabine’s sentencing.

Her response: “Bring back firing squads”. And you thought nine years was harsh?

Tim Veater was pretty exercised about Sabine’s sentence as well, and decided to express his annoyance by torturing all five of his readers with nausea-inducing font-size switches:

A new-to-us hoax promoter, Brian Willmot, got all teary-eyed about the good old days when Sabine used to expose “Satatinic Ritual Abuse & UK Government Child Snatching”:

Brian Gerrish piped up too, with a tweet indicating his intention to continue attempting to sell the false allegations for which Sabine has just been jailed:

Brian, of course, had a special place in the hoax, as Abe and Ella dragged the children off to be inspected by him in the week after they returned from Morocco. Either he had his doubts (unlikely) or felt the case was too hot to handle (less unlikely) at that time, but he made up for it when Sabine unleashed the videos in January/February 2015, and has been episodically braying about it ever since.

As Richard Bartholomew of Barths Notes pointed out yesterday, for those in the conspiracy milieu “the instinct is either to double-down or scrub the evidence, rather than to admit to having colluded in a terrible error that needs to be put right with a corrective repudiation”. 

It seems a foolish choice, as we’ve now seen that the police and courts have developed an appetite for dealing with the stalking and harassment which seem endemic to the conspiracy community.

Sabine’s trial has shown us that the harm done by those who wilfully spread lies about individuals and communities will no longer be ignored or minimised, and that hefty sentences will be imposed on those who use the internet as a weapon of terror.

92 thoughts on “Hoax supporters react to Sabine McNeill sentence

  1. I noticed a lot on Twitter today & FB asking what they could do about it. I very nearly told them that when the ‘King of John Wants Brains’ arrives he intends to free her, but held back as it might have been too much news for their mush brains to take in all at the one time.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. When King Arthur returns to Camelot on one of Mel’s dragons it will all be ok.

    Darn, do we have to watch Gerrish now (paint drying) in case he does something illegal. GRRRR!

    Liked by 3 people

  3. 😲 I was in my Catholic school and church choirs when I was younger. She’s talking a load of bollocks 😂😂😂

    Liked by 2 people

  4. And in common with a number of other hoaxers, she also still thinks that the Hampstead church in question is a Catholic church.

    Liked by 3 people

  5. Someone seems to lack basic physiological knowledge of which organ of the body produces testosterone.

    Like

  6. “King of John Wants Brains”. Love it.
    Anyhow GOS has already made a claim on all of Westminster so John Wanoa can bloody well sod off. It’s all MINE and I won’t have a bloody New Zealander interloper attempting to rain on my parade. I do love ’em though, those New Zealanders and have a relative there, disturbingly in Rotarua where the phony King hails from but his mom, my aunt, did have the title Lady after marrying a Knight of The Realm (very late in life) so we are true aristocracy even if vicariously and by association and the whole of the British crown is mine mine mine.

    Liked by 1 person

  7. That didn’t happen at my Catholic school either, Owl. I know that there was a period in history when the castrati did exist (not the Catholic Church’s finest hour) but it’s a very long time ago. And if the woman heard chanting from underground and considered it sinister why didn’t she do something about it then and there.

    Liked by 1 person

  8. Ahhh Charisse Burchett. She popped up on a page called Dignity for the NHS posting about this (but didnt name anyone) mate of mine let them know about this page and what she was tryiong to insinuate and they banned her and removed her posts. She’s a right anti vaxxer weirdo amongst other things, tries taking Dr Christian Jessen on on twitter a lot (and loses). They’re a strange old bunch arent they?

    Liked by 1 person

  9. Also, correct me if I’m wrong but doesn’t castration usually only mean losing Tom and Harry? Christine seems to think it involves losing little Richard too.

    Liked by 1 person

  10. Get away with stealing my inheritance GoS! 😉 My late Grandad worked for the Queen mother & when she was out in her carriage once, she wanted some tasty curry chips, as you do, but had no dosh on her, true that, my Grandad & her made a verbal contract that she would pay him back the 5 shillings, he insisted she write an I.O.U., which you do with the Royals, but wait, get this, she forgot to put the amount on it, she enjoyed her curry chips btw, so my Grandad never pursued it & we found the I.O.U. in his great coat after he passed. Now that John of the No Brains has decided to take over the Monarchy we’ve decided to put in our claim to stop him. We’re holding an I.O.U. meeting next week at a ginormous wheel over the Thames. Be there or be ⬜. You can come Sam seeing as you really are aristocracy, John of the No Brain, you’re not welcome! Turn up & we’ll duck you in the big pond! 🚾

    Like

  11. It can mean just the testicles or the entire convex genitalia.

    If Christine is so concerned about religious castration she should be campaigning against Ram Rahim Singh, a dodgy guru who persuaded hundreds of his followers to castrate themselves.
    https://www.thedailybeast.com/indias-castration-cult-wants-a-do-over

    Of course there is not a snowflake in hell’s chance of this happening because Ran Rahim Singh’s cult is a) dangerous and b) a real thing and Christine only likes to campaign against imaginary cults.

    Also see (or not if you are a sensitive soul – reader discretion etc) the Skoptsy
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skoptsy

    Liked by 1 person

  12. The grand finale will be the coming trial of Angela Power Disney. I know Hoaxtead blog does not ask for funds, but the proposal made does not come from Hoaxtead, but from me and supported by a good many people who would gladly fund the expenses of Karen Irving aka El Coyote to Ireland to report on the trial of Disney, which may happen later in 2019 or early 2020.

    Liked by 3 people

  13. There is some good news for Angela out of all this. The great mathematician Sabine has been spotted doing the sums to calculate her own precise release date on the back of her campaign of mindnumbing idiocy.

    When she hasfinally finished the number crunching Angie will benefit by knowing how many additional years she will be banged up for and thus prepare the exact number of bales of “pissed stained knickers”(copyright Wavy1) to load into the paddy wagon when it arrives.Her family and neighbours will also be able to draw up a clear strategy both as to how long the street party will last and which decade exactly not allow her back into their midst to shit all over the place again.Win/win.

    Liked by 2 people

  14. If ” King John” is allowed entry in to the UK after the info and links I have given to the UK Border Control then I will take a buggering! Maybe a few more of us should let them know of his intentions and background as well,just to make sure.

    Liked by 1 person

  15. It makes me sick that Abe is busy “snuggling up to camels” when it gets cold in the desert when he deserves to be in a prison cell.


    Liked by 2 people

  16. Pity its probably not the done thing to crowdfund a bounty hunter to hunt the slimy bastard down and deliver him to DC Martin with a bow firmly attached to his genitalia.

    Liked by 2 people

  17. As a consolation, he looks an even bigger dick than normal. I bet the locals are having a good chuckle at him.

    Liked by 2 people

  18. it never fails to piss me off that it is always “a 74 year old disabled woman” that is being “picked on” by those evil courts police, elites etc etc.
    The same people APD, Dunn, Pikey, Devine etc never hesitate to demand the head chopping off any old person who is the target of wild accusations despite any actual evidence being presented. Being old, disabled, suffering from Alzheimers etc, is never relevant then for some reason.
    Double standards meter showing 100%

    anon

    Liked by 1 person

  19. By the way EC, before I forget, not one of these shitheads (and all of us too, of course) would have a clue what went on at all if it weren’t for you keeping the world up to date.
    Even shits like Ian Joseph decides (having not attended or knowing anything much at all) that it was a secret “kangaroo” court. Then complains about the witnesses’ indentites being protected. What can’t these people understand about the desire not to have children’s indentities plastered all over the internet.
    This from a so called ‘campaigner’ for parental rights.

    Methinks this subject (protecting children’s identities in cases like these) may be a good explainer post to educate the numpties. If anyone has the interest and skills to present this, it would be useful as so many peoples seem to either have dificulties understanding it or they appear to purposely want to know all about other people’s children in a very unsavoury way.

    I would be extremely surprised if you have had any words of thanks from any of them for all your hard and extremely competent work. Don’t think it is not appreciated.

    anon

    Liked by 2 people

  20. With that Lawrence of Arabia get-up the only thing he’d have in common with T.E is that are both diminutive.
    What’s that from you in the back row? something about anal? I’ve no idea what you’re talking about.

    Like

  21. I’m new to the Hoaxtead site, so apologies if this has already been covered here, but why do you think people believe something so obscene and ridiculous as the Hampstead hoax and keep rabbiting on about it?

    Like

  22. Spivey allows someone to post a link to a video of the victims after the court has issued a ban on naming them. And Spivey knows it’s there because of comments positively.
    I think the only one who WON’T breach her court order will be Bellender as I reckon she’s too smart. Eddie Is a Cock is bound to put his foot in it and Spivey is on thin ice,

    Like

  23. As I say, I can’t vouch for the veracity of this video but I can say that last year Angie herself was boasting about her son and his band writing and performing a song which contained death threats to Hoaxtead Research associates.

    He also posted some quite nasty stuff about one of Angie’s Hampstead victims back in August, just after the Garda raid.

    Liked by 1 person

  24. This might be true. It might not.
    It’s up to the police to investigate and not up to us to accept anything without evidence.
    Just the way I feel.

    Like

  25. Some do it because they can make money out of it, some because they are mentally ill and it fits with their paranoid world view and others do it because they are spiteful and malicious and want to ruin the lives of people they secretly envy.

    Liked by 1 person

  26. Agreed, Fnord. I’m concerned that some of our YouTube friends have jumped on this like it’s proven fact. I’m not sure whether Dee is a reliable source (?) and also, isn’t regurgitating online gossip as fact the exact thing we’re fighting against?

    Liked by 2 people

  27. Youtube lie.
    I’ve been reporting one video of the children for 2 years now and it’s still there.
    I think these parents must collectively demand politicians act and also consider taking legal action against both FB & YT.

    Liked by 3 people

  28. I could have also posted John Lennon’s ‘No. 9 Dream’ (which I love) but I thought it would result in Cat Scot making a video about the number 9. 😆

    Like

  29. There are still dozens of videos on YT and even one by Deborah Mahmoudieh titled “Hampstead Case is VALIDATED”.
    Many of these posts are by people living in the UK who are well known among the ‘truther’ set.

    Liked by 1 person

  30. Yeah, I’ve mentioned before that Debs left some of her Hampstead videos up despite being told by the police to take them all down. She also ‘likes’ Hampstead videos so they appear in her YT stream.

    Like

  31. Indeed and I think the video is now unavailable.
    No idea how posted it or what the truth is but APD cannot continue blatantly accusing all and sundry without proof and involve her children in her campaigns without blowback.

    Like

  32. Oh yes, wasn’t he the one in court and Belinda’s name came up some where and she legged it back to England. She was also heard to say, well, if he uses language like that he deserves to go to prison. Mean while she was seen supporting him with her banners every now and then, another one she pushed under the big red one.

    Like

  33. To the superlative Justin Sanity, if you hang up your hat without a leaving party, I will be sad 😔

    Can I just say thank you for your thoughts that you have shared. Thank you! I am glad you found this whole horrible, terrible thing, and tried to do good. I hope I have learnt something. I hope it wasn’t just how absolutely venal people can be about children being hurt.

    Liked by 1 person

  34. Can’t agree with the judge’s sentencing remarks. I know what she did was unforgiveable, but Sabine is still a victim. As for the UK Column, these are idiots who are totally immune to facts. Gerrish even defends the more extreme garbage. No rational person should patronise such a “news” service.

    Like

  35. Sabine had done this before and been censured by the courts. Look on Bailii and you will see she has been asked to take blogs down prior to the Hampstead case. She continued to champion the case even if she took certain pages down. I disagree with you thinking she is a victim. She is only a victim of her arrogance and ideas of invincibility and grandeur.

    Liked by 1 person

  36. Poor Charise has been triggered on twitter, i dont know how to post photos but everyones a satanitc paedophile or a satanist. (link posted with spaces for safety)
    https :/ / twitter.com / Charbr evolution/ with_ replies

    Like

  37. Gerrish collaborates with Clive de Carle, supplement pimp and self-proclaimed Health Guru. Now I know that there is tough competition in the “Alternative Health” to be the skeeziest, lowest-life scammer, but de Carle is a strong contender.
    Even if there were no other evidence, Gerrish becomes a fraudster simply from the association with de Carle.

    Like

  38. For clarification, it was her thinking that 1666 preceded 1665 that jumped out at me.

    Like

  39. I have some real issues with this video, sorry. Not impressed by Cip Clips’ Sabine video either. Please don’t hold that against me, guys

    Like

  40. The guy’s hearts in the right place but there’s misinformation in this video. Quite a lot of important information is incorrect.

    Like

  41. Can you suggest some search terms for her on Bailii because I looked under both Sabine McNeill and Sabine Kurjo and found nothing.

    Like

  42. Odd, I found it, maybe I have superpowers. Try http://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/format.cgi?doc=/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2015/26.html&query=(sabine)+AND+(mcneill) which gives you P&Q (the Hoaxtead case) and Doncaster v Watson (the Victoria Haigh case).
    The key point is probalby in P&Q where Pauffley J said “Notwithstanding injunctions restraining Ms Draper and Sabine McNeill, one of her supporters, from publishing information from the proceedings on the internet or elsewhere, such material continues to be uploaded. Efforts to persuade internet servers to remove material have been of only limited value. As soon as information is removed by one provider, it emerges elsewhere.” That was in 2015.
    She was also told to stop doing it when she received the restraining order and by the judge who dealt with her first breach of that – he is quoted a couple of days ago telling her that if she carried on she’d go to prison. He also prophetically said that she probably wouldn’t take any notice. She was also told not to do it when she was granted bail AND the first time she breached bail.
    If I were representing her I might take a punt on getting a psychiatric report for an appeal, as there does seem to be a clear obsession here, but it’s quite broadbased – in additional to Hoaxtead she’s supported a number of causes which are invariably bad – the child abusing Musas, the violent and insane Maurice Kirk, the delusional paedophile Brian Pead, and so on. It may be connected with the decline in judgement which comes with age (similar to the recklessness of teenagers), though when she set off on this path she was under 70.

    Liked by 1 person

  43. Thank you for the link. And she’s done it before Hoaxtead, you say? I’m not that far off 70 so I hope my brain isn’t in decline. Somebody has put up a video (sorry it’s been mentioned before) saying it was her first offence and implying that she (Mrs McNeill) had been duped by other participants in the hoax. I’ll put the link but the comments there show there are some very gullible people.

    Like

  44. I don’t know what went wrong (unless somebody deleted it) but here is the link to the person who thought Mrs McNeill had maybe been treated harshly though they didn’t say she was innocent. https://youtu.be/OJDL9Ic1VgM

    Like

Comments are closed.