Yesterday the court heard from a witness, Mr Greenwood, via direct link, which failed twice. HHJ Sally Cahill QC was quite displeased at this turn of events, and ordered that Mr Greenwood’s cross-examination take place in person, so he was the first witness in the box this morning.
Witness 2 cross-examination
Tana Adkin QC reviewed Greenwood’s testimony from yesterday, confirming that on 10 February 2018 at Church House prior to the day’s session of Synod, Sabine approached him, identified herself by name, and handed him a four-page document.
“You confirmed that [the document in evidence] was the document you were given, and that your note on it was made later,” Adkin said. “You also confirmed that she said she had a problem with persecution, and wanted help. Is it fair to say that having been identified as a solicitor, she came to you?”
Greenwood replied that he was not sure how Sabine had come to him. He confirmed that a young man, later identified as Jake Clarke, had given him another document while the Synod session was in progress, and stated that he and his group had been outside the Synod hall at that time, as they were not allowed in.
He said he did not know where Jake had come from, nor whether he was handing out the same document to others. However, he said that Jake was not with Sabine when she handed him the document. Sabine had stated at that time that she was under some sort of injunction.
Greenwood concluded that he was unable to help her, and said she should be referred to her own criminal lawyer.
On re-examination, Miranda Moore QC asked, “Was there a public viewing gallery in the hall where Synod was taking place?” Greenwood said there was, but that he and his group had not gone in, as they would not have been welcome.
“When you said ‘her’ criminal lawyer, that’s an unusual choice of words”, Moore said. Greenwood responded that Sabine had told him that some sort of criminal law sanction was in place, and so from this he assumed that she had a criminal lawyer.
Asked whether he had told Sabine’s friend, who had contacted him by email, that he believed Sabine’s case would be outside his area of expertise, Greenwood replied that this was correct.
A second witness testified following Mr Greenwood. As we’ve stated, this case is under reporting restrictions to protect the identities of any children involved, and so we are amalgamating some of the non-identifying evidence heard from yesterday’s third witness and today’s second witness, to give readers a sense of the testimony heard.
Both witnesses described how they had initially had no idea that anything untoward was happening in their children’s lives, until they were informed by friends that there was material online they needed to see.
They described a growing sense of horror as they began searching the internet for their children’s names, and started discovering more and more material making outlandish and distressing claims: that their children had been sexually abused, that they, as parents of these children, had both abused them and allowed others to do so, and that they were part of a cult which involved not only ritual sexual abuse, but also importing, torturing, murdering, and eating babies, and drinking their blood.
Asked how they felt when they realised that they and their children had been named, one of the witnesses responded that they’d felt “sick, worried, in shock, and confused”; the other said they just could not understand what was going on at the time, and that they don’t know why it has not been stopped. “How is this possible?” they asked.
Both witnesses described feeling utterly overwhelmed by the viral nature of the material online, both in video and print form, and said it was very hard to keep up with all of it. However, said one, keeping up with what was out there became a part of their daily life, as it seemed the only way to try to keep their children safe.
Describing the list of named parents and children from Christ Church Primary School, which had originated with Ella Draper but had been spread by Sabine, a witness said that it had obviously been cut and pasted from class lists.
“There would be a representative in the class”, a witness said, “and they would make up the class list, so that parents could arrange play-dates for their children”. These lists were particular to each class, and were only shared with other parents whose children were in that class. Ella’s list contained the same errors and omissions as an older class list, the witness said.
Given the threats made to “rescue” their children, both witnesses described having to take extraordinary measures to ensure their children’s safety. One described having security cameras installed, and said, “We had to rethink our activities. We now have to watch to see if people are following us…our lives just aren’t normal any more”.
“I’m constantly scouring—is that person over there taking my child’s photo? I’ve had to train my child to turn their head if they see anyone take out a phone”, a witness said, adding that the case has taken over their life. “I’m not functioning like a normal person. I don’t go out…I’m scared if someone tries to get into my house to take my child”.
Both witnesses described receiving a barrage of threats—including death threats—from people they did not know, both online and by telephone. One witness described receiving an email from a person who said they wanted to contact the witness’s child with a view to beginning a sexual relationship. The witness stated that on receiving this email, they vomited.
One of the witnesses described how they had become aware of online discussion about Barbie-type dolls. They saw this originally on a blog belonging to Sabine, in which she was asking her readers to take direct action to “save the children”. She was asking people to paint Barbie-type dolls with red nail varnish and send them to those accused by Ella and Abraham.
The witness stated that they had seen this suggestion in print, and had then heard it repeated on a video.
The witness also described a Change.org petition, where readers could find links back to Sabine’s main Google Drive, which contained details of all of those accused.
One witness described the activities of Rupert Quaintance, noting that they had found his original videos with Angela Power-Disney whilst “scouring the internet” in search of material pertaining to their children. They described their worry when they learned that Rupert was making threats to come to Hampstead, where he “planned to use his fists, break down doors, and take our children’s blood to test whether we were drugging them”.
The witness alerted police, and watched Quaintance’s activities online very closely. Quaintance was described as “very aggressive”.
“He did a video saying he was here, and that he was going to investigate at the school”, the witness said, noting that Rupert had in fact gone to the church and urinated on it, and had then taken a photo of himself outside the school, which he had posted on the first morning of school in September 2016. Under the photo, he claimed to be carrying a knife.
A witness described Sabine’s Whistleblower Kids blog, noting that it contained links to all the videos of RD’s children, in addition to links to Sabine’s Google Drive, which contained material both from Sabine and from Ella Draper, naming various people as Satanic sexual abusers and providing their children’s names, along with their personal contact details.
The witnesses also described Sabine’s posts—all containing links which led to similar material—on platforms such as Facebook and Twitter.
One witness described the July 2016 trial at Blackfriars Crown Court, following which Sabine and Neelu had been issued with restraining orders. The witness said that a few months after the restraining order was put in place, they had received an email from the person running Hoaxtead Research.
“This was a blog pointing out that all this was a hoax”, the witness said. “I had contacted them to thank them, because it seemed like no one else was saying this online”.
The witness said that a person unknown to them had contacted Hoaxtead Research via the blog’s Contact Us email address, and had sent them an email they’d received from Sabine. Karen Irving, the person who writes the blog, forwarded the email to the witness, as it contained information which might need to be reported to the police.
The email’s recipients included Neelu Berry and Christine Ann Sands, and the witness said that from this email it became clear that Sabine was “ramping the case back up”.
The email, which has been entered into evidence, read as follows:
Criminalised Child Abuse Whistleblower. Bottom lines of exile, arrests, hate crimes and hearings under The Shard.
Dear Co-Defendant and ‘Partner in Crime’
You asked me for the Charges sheet that I attach. I pleaded not-guilty on the first, as they didn’t have any evidence, and guilty on the German comment. That contained two links:
1. To the German post that also has the photo of abusers’ genitals – which they didn’t charge me with, surprise, surprise;
2. The chronology of my whistleblower treatment which had a link to the allegations as my violation – which could have been in ‘defiance’ according to the judge but was ‘minor’ according to my barrister.
As a 3rd item and ‘hot information’ that I wanted the German Disclosure Platform to do something about, the comment had counts of the ‘innocent abusers’. I got them from Ella’s ‘initial document’. These counts matter to me! Hence I attach the text, after having taken out all references to me. My solicitor told us that people can publish whatever they want, unless I INSTRUCT them to do so… That’s what turns them into my ‘agents’.
‘Naming and shaming’ is clearly what the cult defends its members against – with all the might of Police and Courts.
The videos are on this link:
[link redacted as it contains images of RD’s children]
The transcripts on:
The fabulous “D—Does Hampstead” has turned into “Believe the Children”
“Hampstead Research” is still on HRTube:
I shall concentrate on SYSTEMIC issues now:
· The Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse
o With another fabulous comment by Truth1!
Petition to Abolish Police Bail
· Statistics for Europe
o Since trends have been rising and September was the ‘biggest catch’ ever [1,200 children] I shall use my software invention to compare Councils and their choice of children regarding ethnicity.
On top of the Restraining Order I now have a 12 months condition that reinforces their ability to sentence me with prison. The CPS would have liked £1,200 costs, but I was accepted as being too poor for that!…
Contrary to what our enemies on Hoaxtead wrote, my solicitor assures me that the criminal tick is only on the Police record. But it doesn’t matter. I have become a “Criminalised Child Abuse Whistleblower”. Watch out. Don’t follow me!
However, supporters point out that the ‘whistleblower brand’ is important in these mad making times, where I find it hardest to make sense of what is happening around me while responding to what has happened to me, especially as Ella and Abraham publish that I am a ‘government agent’…
One thing is for sure: I now know first hand how ‘the system’ is about:
1. Intimidation to achieve compliance;
2. Barristers playing Ping Pong with arguments and Poker with evidence;
3. Judges becoming the interpreters of evidence talking to ‘criminal suspects’ like school masters.
The original ‘case’ gets diluted into nit picking as a single issue, black and white decision: guilty or not. As a good friend put it: you stood on his toe!? Yes or no? Don’t ask why!
God save ‘citizens’ and ‘subjects’ from being exposed to the might of this network of ‘lice in conspiracy’:
· Six arrests of 10 hours average
o Two nights in a police cell – i.e. 43 hours
o Critical property seized and not yet returned [Holborn and Barnet Police]
· Police Bail [‘legal limbo’] or house arrest since 04 August 2015
o Barnet Police still wait for CPS to charge or not re ‘intimidation of witnesses’ in December
· Three hate crimes
o Brick, verbal assault and internet cables cut
· DWP stopping pension in May last year
o Still in appeal proceedings about that
· Camden Council stopping rent payments
o Still trying to recuperate some missing monies
· Camden Council requesting council tax
o Still having to acquiesce them after they took me to court.
· Failure to hear my Application to Set Aside which I filed from Berlin
o The trap of using court hearings for arrests when they insisted on personal presence after an Interpol alert…
Conspiratorial lice benefitting from the public gravy train – by picking nits. 1%.
We shall have to keep going in this battle between Good and Evil.
Each in our own way!
Never be my agent! Always be as self-motivated as you’ve been so far!
With sighs of relief waiting to become songs of Peace and Joy,
PS. As part of Belinda’s magical network of Knights and Angels I have now found the two programmers with whom to advance the software invention!!! Off to see my ‘government hacker’ tomorrow about that!!! And working on a Crowdfunder application! x
The email from Sabine also contained links to her Google Drive, which contains the 11-page document made by Ella Draper, as well as to the charge sheets from her most recent arrest.
The witness who received this email from Hoaxtead Research alerted the police about it.
Following the testimony, cross-examination, and re-examination of Witness 2, the jury were shown two videos—one from Charlotte Ward’s “Hampstead Research” videos, and an excerpt from one titled, “Hampstead Confidential with Sabine, part 2“, posted by Angela Power-Disney. In the latter video, Angela and Sabine discussed the whereabouts of both RD’s children, and the children of the (now 30) so-called “special families”.
Following these videos, court was adjourned until the morning of Monday, 26 November.