Man accepts Fiona Barnett’s challenge … to her chagrin

The other day we were browsing about on Twitter, as one does, when we noticed an interesting snippet of news. In her bid to claim to have been raped by every well-known person in the second half of the 20th century, Fiona Barnett recently alleged that she had been sexually molested by none other than the late American evangelical Christian preacher Reverend Billy Graham.

It seems that Fiona Barnett had challenged her followers not to take her word for it, but to check her story out with retired NYPD police officer Jim Rothstein: Fiona Barnett 2018-08-30 TwitterIn fact, she claimed to be so certain that Rothstein would support her story about Graham that she challenged anyone who disbelieved her to call him and check it out. And she published his phone number.

One enterprising soul, a born-again Christian called Bill Chapman, decided to take Fiona at her word (generally a bad idea, as we shall see). Here’s what happened:

 

In the video, Chapman ensures that Rothstein is comfortable with him recording the call (a nicety we don’t often see). Then he asks,

So there’s a lady online right now, her name is Fiona Barnett. She is an Australian woman and has come to prominence over the years by making claims of Satanic ritual abuse as well as being abused by high-level Australian government officials and also recently, the late Reverend Billy Graham.

Making some outstanding, really outlandish claims that she was kidnapped, and taken to the Bohemian Grove in California, and raped by former President Richard Nixon, as well as Billy Graham, and when some people started to call her on it, she posted your name and your phone number…as well as an article about you. So I read that article and did some more reading about you, and I see the stuff that you did to combat child trafficking and it’s incredible the work that you put into that, and the difference it made. …

Can you go on the record and either substantiate or debunk these claims about Billy Graham that Fiona is claiming that you can corroborate all her testimony? 

Rothstein’s response is swift and devastating:

I don’t corroborate anybody’s testimony, but I can tell you that I never ever had any evidence or any information that discredited Billy Graham, or that he was involved in this in any way. Never anywhere did we run across that. 

Whoops.

To say Fiona was unhappy about this turn of events would be an understatement: Fiona Barnett 2018-08-30 Twitter 2Note that nearly 350 Fiona loyalists were nodding their heads emphatically in the background, and 130 of them retweeted her retort. For convenience, we will refer to these people as “FeeFee’s Flying Monkeys”. They will figure later on in the story.

Fiona’s anger was not reserved solely for Rothstein, though. Chapman received the standard vilification, reserved for anyone who challenges the deranged stories of online SRA fantasists: Fiona Barnett 2018-08-31 Twitter 3

Given that Chapman had dared to diss Barnett in the worst possible way—illustrating very vividly that she was in fact lying about Billy Graham—it’s hardly surprising that since the video was released, FeeFee’s Flying Monkeys have been swarming him, doing their best to smear him with the sort of slime which a person of his religious beliefs would find both offensive and ludicrous.

They have called him a “gay porn star”, a “pedophile”, a “CIA Luciferian”, an “MK Ultra handler”…all the usual.

Clearly, all this attention means he hit a nerve, and she didn’t like it.

Let’s be clear here

Looking at Chapman’s Twitter feed, it’s clear that our beliefs and interests are very, very different from his. He used to “research” QAnon, which we consider a cynical and dangerous hoax. To be fair, he has moved on from it, but still.

We do think that taking Barnett up on her dare—and doing it in a diligent, thorough, and respectful manner—showed a real commitment to finding the truth, which we can’t fault whatsoever.

In a similar vein, Chapman emailed Colonel Michael Aquino, a prominent Satanist who Barnett claimed had been involved in her MK Ultra programming when she was a child. Chapman asked whether this story was true, and Aquino asserted that it was not. In the course of the correspondence, Chapman mentioned his own military service, and Aquino thanked him; take a wild guess what Barnett did with that?

Yep. Fiona Barnett 2018-08-30 Twitter 4“A genuine Christian does not serve a Satanist”? Perhaps. But “genuine Christians” have certainly been known to serve in the military. And it’s considered polite to thank them for this.

Has she done this before?

In an interesting twist, we noted this tweet from one of Chapman’s Twitter followers: Fiona Barnett 2018-08-30 Twitter 5Hmm. Is it possible that for some sick reason, Barnett makes a habit of daring people to check up on her false accusations, only to use the inevitable denials as fodder for online harassment? Could she really be that devious?

Given what FeeFee and her Flying Monkeys have meted out to Chapman this week, we’re beginning to wonder. Fiona Barnett

101 thoughts on “Man accepts Fiona Barnett’s challenge … to her chagrin

  1. I know you don’t fundraise here, but couldn’t we all chip in the get the poor old trout a bottle of frizz eaze ?

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Wouldn’t a sensible reaction be to phone the copper herself and say ‘Look mate, you’ve put me in a difficult position here’ and record the whole thing.
    But she can’t do that can she because it’s not true.

    Liked by 3 people

  3. A ghastly vile woman. The grandchild of one dead politician, she has accused was so bullied at school after other kids read Barnett’s Bullshit on the web he had to be moved away from his friends to another school. His parents also changed his name to his mother’s maiden name so he wouldn’t suffer the same again.

    This woman is sick and a vicious nasty liar.

    Dysfunction For Dollars
    “A close reading of Pelzer’s books leaves other readers with the impression that they may not be entirely true. Pelzer has an exquisite recall of his abuse, but almost no recall of anything that would authenticate that abuse. ”

    “I spoke with one of Pelzer’s younger brothers, Stephen, 40, who was stricken with Bell’s palsy as a child and whose speech is slightly slurred. Stephen denies his mother abused David or burned him or forced him to eat dog feces. ”Please!” he says. ”That never happened.” As a witness to the stabbing incident, Stephen says: ”I saw mom cutting food when David grabbed her arm and got a small cut from the knife. There wasn’t even any blood, yet he screamed, ‘Mommy stabbed me!”’

    Liked by 3 people

  4. I first ran across her years ago when living near Byron Bay, she was ‘well known’ there even back then for her tall tales, and it was the local paper that first gave her her boost out of obscurity (thanks to a relative who worked there) and the national papers picked up the story and ran with it. Her stories have gotten more and more expansive and bizarre over the years, now it seems that she will literally prostitute herself for any fame and attention, no matter how bizarre the story is, as long as she gets attention…

    Liked by 4 people

  5. Nice digging, EC.

    I’d forgotten about these – Angela and Fiona, sickos that they are, were already making child abuse allegations against Billy Graham on the day he died:

    Liked by 1 person

  6. Excellent find, EC 😃

    It seems all people who don’t support troofers’ claims work for the CIA, MI5 or Mossad. Their combined salary budget must be eye-popping!

    Liked by 2 people

  7. “Clearly, all this attention means he hit a nerve, and she didn’t like it.”

    Haha, by their own ‘logic’ be damned! What is it they say? “They wouldn’t attack you if you weren’t on to something…Their attacks prove your [sic] right…They only get defensive when your [sic] over the target…Yadda yadda…”

    Liked by 3 people

  8. It takes a particular kind of nasty to post someone’s mobile number on the internet and call for people to phone them. I guess we should be thankful that Fiona wasn’t around when the Hampstead accused’s details were leaked.

    Liked by 4 people

  9. And speaking of disgruntled scammers who don’t like being called out on their bullshit…



    ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

    Liked by 2 people

  10. And here’s ANOTHER liar who can’t handle being called out on her bullshit. Christ, they’re out in force this week!







    Liked by 1 person

  11. And then there’s the erratic nature of it, especially when babies are out of season. It does make my Universal Credit meetings a bit awkward. “How much did you earn last month?” “It’s a secret and if I told you I’d have to skin you and drink your blood.”

    Liked by 3 people

  12. I think Tariq inadvertently hit the nail on the head: “Everyone with an ounce of brain knows…”

    Meanwhile the rest of us, with around the adult human average of 48 ounces, can separate fact from fiction and call out racists when we see them.

    Liked by 3 people

  13. Also, most of us don’t base allegations and theories on instinct, as he does. We go fact-checking and evidence-hunting. Alien concepts to these muppets.

    Liked by 1 person

  14. Or just watch a video by a random internet loon. That should give you all the facts you need. Right, Angie?

    Liked by 1 person

  15. To “celebrate” the return of the Hempseed Two, spoof specialists MK and Dun have leapt into action to welcome them back in style…

    Liked by 1 person

  16. This is a significant find and honestly, I doubt you have the shelf space for the amount of Koala Awards you are due.
    This is one of the first real bits of evidence of blatant lies of a Satanic Fruit Loop being exposed. And it shows her capacity for maliciousness.

    Liked by 2 people

  17. Poisoning wells? Spreading diseases? That’s some real old-school medieval OG antisemitism right there. I haven’t heard that kind of crap since the 1320s. But he left out “sacrificing christian children to use their blood to make passover bread”, so we must deduct some points.

    Liked by 2 people

  18. That was very tasty, thank you! 🙂
    I would caution, that I’ve talked about Jim Rothstein here before. While he was with NYPD Rothstein was an anti-gay crusader, involved in extorting false allegations from Gay men about other “persons of interest” by the threat of charging them with something like drug possession.

    Liked by 1 person

  19. This guy is obviously unstable and he needs to be taken to a doctor. While he’s spreading this rubbish he himself must be living in some kind of mental hell.

    Liked by 1 person

  20. I am glad that Dr Michael Aquino is still hanging in there despite fighting off cancer to be able to deny the bullshit that Satan Hunters routinely try to hang upon him. Lucien Greaves is another Satanist who folk like the man-who-we-know-but-never-mention-his-name has made a fashion of as being linked to wicked schemes involving babies, kittens and brain frying ray guns, who is young enough to reject all the fantasy for decades to come. I personally have been linked to rumours of doing nasty things to jelly babies, but I can live with that, because I do nasty things to jelly babies.

    When people are dead, the nasty Satan Hunters come out of the cracks and crevices like so many cockroaches to say any amount of bullshit without fear of being challenged, The dead do not speak some people reckon.

    As a Satanist I used to go once a month to a networking event where they ordered pizza. Now they use a new in-house cook who makes yummy products that brings spirit cooking to a whole new level. I also like apple doughnuts and chicken nuggets. All these comments are innocent enough, but to the mind of a Satan Hunter, it gets transformed into a video nasty. To say I eat chocolate cookies, becomes to a Satan Hunter, Satanist worships Molech (who fcking worships Molech?) whilst eating cookies made of baby eyeballs.

    Personally, I think if Becki Percy wants to be rich and famous, she should raise her game from being sexually-whatever by her working class family to being sexually-whatever by Justin Bieber, Donald Trump and a dozen boy bands. That gal has no creative imagination of the many top politicians, sports people, actors and rock stars she could include in her fantasy world.

    Anyway, the latest from the Becki Percy soap opera is that she and mummy is moving house, downsizing. This suggests financial issues, lil Becky is an expensive gal to maintain. No mention in public if the male members of the household are included in the move, which some consider odd and raises speculations that something is going down between the females and male (males) of the Potsboro house where Becki currently lives. Some consider that an odd previous Twitter post by Becki Percy about an unnamed person being found to have illegal porn on their computer, might be linked to the disruption Becki now faces. Others speculate and have wild ideas about Ron being accused of things. I asked Mummy No.2 if she knew something, but she was surprised by recent developments, and knows nothing; evidently Mummy No.2 is no longer in the loop on what goes on in the life of Miss Eyebrows.

    Liked by 4 people

  21. I’d heard this about the Pelzer story. It seems that some people have a need to be elevated as über-victims. I think it’s probably true that it appeals to the public’s desire for miraculous recoveries from dire circumstances.

    Liked by 1 person

  22. Is Andy Devine and John Paterson the same person? I get confused with all these crazies running around saying much the same thing.

    Paterson tweeted me yesterday, I felt special for once, because the crazies usually ignore me, he invited me to go die.

    Liked by 3 people

  23. Thanks for the update, SV. If Becki aspires to be the new Barnett, she really is going to have to up her game. And most interesting about the possible goings-on chez Mummy #3…let us know how it comes out!

    Liked by 3 people

  24. I get somewhat puzzled about the law and how the Hoaxteaders get away with so much. Perhaps the times are about to catch up with them.
    https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-hampshire-43201269
    Southampton ‘paedophile hunter’ guilty of false claim
    A self-styled “paedophile hunter”, whose videos have been watched millions of times by Facebook users, has been convicted of falsely accusing a man of grooming teenagers.

    Stephen Dure, 34, also known as Stevie Trap, pleaded guilty to making an improper communication online.

    His wrongly-accused victim said he had been sacked and his home had been attacked as a result.

    Liked by 4 people

  25. Peadophile hunters do what they do for fame and sense of power. To these guys a thirty-minute filmed encounter with a “groomer” whilst they get to be self-righteous and torture them by describing how their life, job, family and friends will be destroyed, then watching them visibly break before being carted away by the police is a seriously strong powertrip.

    However, the “market” is swarming with paedophile hunters, probably five for every one groomer on a chatroom. In a market of supply and demand the food that the paedophile hunters feed upon is becoming less and less. The stupid groomers have all been eliminated from the market, the more intelligent are catching on to how to avoid the hunters, or will move on to easier pathways to the kids.

    The market is stressed because the paedophile hunters are having to work more and more to get their prey in a highly competitive market. Paedophile hunters are adapting their strategies, and the results of this is starting to become revealed with more and more reported cases as you have highlighted. In addition, the buzz that the paedophile hunters get, the ratings and followings they aspire to have, the celebrity status, means they are opting for greater awe and shock. One worrying outcome is that they will turn up at a groomer house as a mob, they are also becoming more violent, handcuffing people on their own property, and dressing up like law officials with their own branding.

    Their tactics in order to trap a groomer is far more aggressive, deceitful and proactive, and it is the lonely, vulnerable, mentally ill people who might be only on an adult chatsite for a relationship with another adult, who could and do get caught into a situation with clever techniques that the paedophile hunters now use. One individual was actvely persuaded by a paedophile hunter acting as a kid to meet them by raising concerns that they were at risk of harm, the target contacted the police, and foolishly agreed to the meeting, got arrested (no charges) and with the paedophile hunter publicty generated suffered serious consequencies to themselves.

    Knowing the mind tricks that can be played, for instance once the individual is caught emotionally, and are in a “yes” pattern, it is harder to say “no”. A vulnerable person who feels loved and validated by a paedophile or paedophile hunter is vulnerable to being persuaded to do things they would not normally do.

    The paedophile hunters have started behaving in a way that the time is coming when they will become regulated or banned.

    Liked by 4 people

  26. EDIT “One individual was actvely persuaded by a paedophile acting as a kid…” : SHOULD READ “One individual was actvely persuaded by a paedophile hunter acting as a kid…”

    Liked by 1 person

  27. I highly suspect anyone who actively goes out to seek out “pedophiles” and I suspect all these self-appointed “child protection advocates”. Putting on my Freudian hat I think there is something very sinister about them. Police and social workers who work in that area are often circulated so they don’t burn out. This mob salivates over it.

    Again I was reminded about this when reading about a goat I cannot stand- James Randi so-called skeptic and Uri Geller debunker. Now I’m an admitted admirer of Geller but only because I met him once and found him extremely charming and watched him bend someone’s spoons in front of me after warning the audience watches may stop & start etc. My partner that night, on the way home. found her mother’s watch which had stopped years ago and which she carried always in her handbag, had started up again.
    Of course, he may be a brilliant magician and just better than the others in sleight of hand.
    (Geller has also given over $1M to Iraqi child refugee camps)

    But the point is- Randi has never “exposed” anyone, he merely recreates tricks which isn’t the same thing. HopeLessGirl can run her “free energy” machine ” on Youtube and convince people it works whereas we know it’s just plugged into the mains.

    But looking more into Randi’s past and he becomes a more sinister character, not only over the tapes of him inviting a young teen boy to come over for sex which he has described as a “fake” and then a deliberate police sting, or the arrest of his longtime lover who went to live with Randi when he was very young, for identity theft but his association with the False Memory Syndrome Foundation on which sit some seriously sensible people but then- alas a great friend of Randi’s one Ralph Underwager who was apparently a former member of the notorious NAMBLA and who got involved with this highly disturbing Australian case with many parallels to HOAXTEAD – the “Mr Bubbles” case (he was found innocent). This was a case where it seems it was the opposite to the usual exaggerated sensationalism and that serious offenders may very well have got off the hook. Underwager was a witness for the alleged offenders.

    Someone else on here speculated that many of these so-called advocates may, in fact, be deliberately skewering the facts. (the clip is from the Oz “60 Minutes” when it still had some credibility)

    Liked by 4 people

  28. @Well and Truly Down the Rabbit Hole.

    Yes I read some stuff about Randi along those lines.

    From what little I knew about him, I had previously admired his work in exposing charlatans, so it was a bit of a shocker.

    Liked by 2 people

  29. Good question. I wonder if it’s as severe as the sentence for disagreeing with Mary (now using a new “pysendem” and turning on Borderline Me for not following her orders):

    Thank you to Special Agent J for this screenshot

    Liked by 1 person

  30. Another interesting find by Special Agent J. Disappointing too, as Anastasia was really nice when she first popped up and appeared to be criticising loons like Mary for being abusive:

    Like

  31. Someone sent me a link to a really nasty video of a group of these “paedophile hunters” banging the crap out of someone’s door, screaming abuse and threats at him as well as allegations of paedophilia, then knocking on all his neighbours’ doors and telling them they had a paedophile living in their street. Turned out that they didn’t think he was a paedophile at all – he was just some ex-friend they’d fallen out with and this was their way of getting back at him. Apparently this goes on a lot and they also do it to people who criticise them or question their methods. Disgraceful.

    Liked by 1 person

  32. I remember that. There was someone politely questioning them on their live feed and the lead hunter’s reaction was to read out her comments, call her a paedophile and say “We’re coming for you next”. Utterly vile people.

    Liked by 1 person

  33. Her family should get her sectioned under the mental health act. She has two daughters, and she promised them she would never bring this mad shit into their lives again, but she can’t seem to help herself. Just appalling on every level. Twitter and YouTube also have a lot to answer for, letting this stuff increase day in, and day out. One day she will be locked up, but the filth she has spread will all still be out there.

    Liked by 3 people

  34. Her accusations about Antony Kidman began shortly before he died suddenly of natural causes, and to this day she claims ‘credit’ for his death. I can’t understand why the Kidmans don’t make an example of her, – have her legally restrained in some way, given they have the financial resources to lawyer up. Many celebrities have mad stalkers whom they take to court. Someone really needs to step up and stop this disgusting force for evil in her tracks.

    Liked by 4 people

  35. Pingback: Fiona Barnett puts out a challenge and is further exposed as a fraud! – Exposing Survivors Voice Australia

  36. The deluded one is you El Coyote! Stop spreading lies about this woman! Oh yes she’s going to MAKE UP this sex abuse and put herself in to a dangerous situation for something to do is she?? Yeah right and I’m a monkeys Uncle!! I have read your childish nasty comments and it’s making me sick to listen to the dribble that you are spewing to your ignorant followers. You obviously haven’t done any research on this poor woman who has been brought up to have this sick abuse handed out to her! Do you realise that she is in danger of losing her life to shut her up?

    Like

  37. No one here “denies sex abuse”. We do know that some people fabricate claims of sexual abuse for various reasons, including self-aggrandisement and cold hard cash.

    If you don’t like what what we say, perhaps you should go elsewhere.

    Like

  38. What danger has she put herself into Truth Seeker, as far as I can tell the only danger is her getting sued for the slander and BS she’s been spruiking.
    Other than that, most “normal” people are laughing at her!!!

    Liked by 3 people

  39. Scott Scott , your right on the mark , Barnett posted that she was taking a break to write her book and its not called the rabbit hole lol, but she off on a tangent attacking a heap of American citizens , few new regurgitated you tube videos with people with no contact details , you tube bulldust channels, but this is the clanger, she’s now claiming that her brothers were abused by pedofile pete her grandfather , her mother is clueless and her father has some mental disease, thats a new revelation perhaps it all runs in the family

    Like

  40. Steved, Barnetts told that many whoppers she cant remember the truth, recently watched a few of her youtube video interviews with people that do not display their contact details, so one must conclude that the sites all are run thru a moderator who of course will filter what is published, the new revelations are about her own family , her mother is clueless, her father has some mental disorder, and her brothers were abused by her grandfather pedo pete, no pervious posts about that, perhaps we should contact them and ask the directly ” is it true”, well World , I did do some investigating and she did utter some words of truth, when she made the witness statement to Sutherland police, they did visit the house of horrors and do some digging, one hole apparently after notifing the owner that they would before the owner redeveloped the property, findings were as predicted , ZILCH !!!!! it is interesting , the hose of horrors was sold in 2013 so anyone could have gone there to plant evidence like the cant find in her pictures, the satanic ritual etchings on window . She also claims that the CIA procured the services of her relatives to help with the attacks on her now thats a lie, Im related and chose of my own freewill to help expose her lies, like the one in 1985 at Bathurst where the current Commissioner of Human Rights urinated in her mouth during a satanic ritual abuse ceremony , she’s hoodwinked the Victim services commissioner and got a $10,000 payout on a probability , the people at Victim services will not talk , privacy issues but try for justice and try to get them to investigate thouroughly so they can ask for the $$$$ back , glass walls just more glass walls , but at least this site knows the truth, she’s a faker.

    Like

  41. your not the only one with that question , the explanation given to me feed her oxygen and she will thrive in the public arena, she reckons they are trying to bump her off, if they were then she would be part of yesterdays news and not the front page it might just be circumstantial that her claims are against the deceased they cant respond , can they? well not in this life lol

    Like

  42. Barnetts good at slinging stuff, the following extracts is from a recent post of hers
    Peter Holowczak was not solely to blame for my leaving the cult and also abused my father and my brothers. My father, who has complex PTSD and DID, once told my relatives: “Everything Fiona says about the Satanists is true, but we just don’t tell her, for her own good.”
    Nicole Kidman’s father and Rosalind Frances Croucher (current president of Australian Human Rights commission) were to blame. I was selected as Grande Dame by my predecessor, Patricia Anne Conlon. Rosalind Croucher was ambitious, jealous, and wanted the position for herself; Consequently, after Patricia Anne Conlon’s death, Rosalind Croucher sought revenge by organising the Bathurst City Hall birthday gathering in 1985, in which I was raped on an alter by B-grade actor Bruce Spence in front of a room full of Luciferian pedophiles including multiple NSW Police and Catholic priests. Rosalind Croucher presided over this violation of my human rights, alongside NSW Police commissioner John Avery, Australian cricket captain Richie Benaud, and ASIO officer and federal politician Kim Beazley Snr. During the ritual, a fully pregnant breeder and her unborn baby, plus a group of approximately 10 children, were ritually murdered on stage. The whole sordid event ended in a pedophile orgy in which I was gang raped by a group including Rosalind Croucher who urinated in my mouth.
    Can you believe these claims, she’s told that many whoppers she’s forgotten what she’s posted in the past and needs the public limelight to exist , her recent you tube videos shows her in a white room with white curtains and a white bed ,,etc etc etc perhaps its a luney bin

    Like

  43. She needs to be sued for this bullshit. i understand people don’t want to give her the publicity but she has been getting away dragging people’s names into the gutter for years.

    Liked by 1 person

  44. Hey Truth Seeker I am not a Monkies Uncle but I do know her Uncle John who does exist and will willingly speak about the fantasies of his niece , perhaps you should do some proper research and contact him, he can be contacted thru Exposing Survivors Voice Australia site , now there is a challenge for you, hearing the truth from a family member

    Like

  45. Truth Seeker you say your here to stick up for Fiona Barnett I think you are Fiona Barnett perhaps you should contact her Uncle John , so where is that clueless mother of hers and her poor father , who has some mental illness, perhaps it runs in the family, Barnett publications makes me laugh, in her latest publication ,she now reveals that her daddy and brothers were abused by Pedp Pete the grandfather , but I have been busy researching her crap, Barnett tells nothing of her life story from about 1976 to 1985 when the current Human Rights Commissioner Roslyn Croucher raped her and urinated in her mouth at Bathurst in later 1985, at an event held parallel with the big car race held there , my my coming from such a pure blood line and her having such high intelligence
    really go on contact Uncle John on the ESVA site , the world is waiting do it now

    Liked by 1 person

  46. The rules relating to ones privacy here in Australia are something, you can slander all you like, getting the evidence is difficult , how difficult well this may be an example Roslyn Croucher is the current Commissioner for Human Rights, she’s copped a whopper from Barnett raped and urinated in her mouth at a satanic abuse event held at Bathurst in 1985, if you read what the commish states basically its a free for all freedom to say what you like good one , now from my personal experience we have approached a government authority to obtain certain information, now that authority stated that they will have to seek the approval of the sayeee if the sayeee doesn’t respond or give consent its no to the release of that information that’s GIPA for you upon a payment of a fee

    Liked by 2 people

  47. This might explain the protection afforded by the Australian Privacy legislation, I applied under the Government information whatever ” GIPA ” paid my $30 and got my answer, the information I sought is on my employers file under the professional conduct file, I was accused of using local governmet equipment for my own personal use ,, (ie) the phone and internet by sending an email to the independent australiann electronic media garbage publisher. That email was forwarded to my deluded niece the one and only Fiona Rae Barnett AKA the “CANDY GIRL ” sold into the satanic ritual abuse society in the 1970’s,
    Unfortunately they had to contact her to see if she had any objections to the release of the information, email address no longer active and the IT ppl could not find ant contact details on any of her public forums therefore that information request has been refused on the grounds that the release of such information may jeopardise the intent of the legislation to protect ones privacy so its not to be released , under the same legislation you cannot obtain the details of your adjoining property owner to replace the dividing fence , What this tells me is,, COMPLAIN TO THE REGULATORS , YOUR PROTECTED !!!!!!! so what if your complaint is of no substance what a great country Australia is

    Like

Comments are closed.