More evidence that children were forced to lie on videos

A little more than a year ago, we revealed the one piece of information which conclusively demonstrated that RD’s children had been forced to lie in the videos their mother and her boyfriend made on their way back to the UK from Morocco.

Readers might recall that in June 2017 Ella blurted to interviewer Nathan Stolpman that on reflection, she now did not think that her first husband, his current wife, and her eldest son were involved with the “cult” at all. She claimed that she’d been under pressure when she had stated they were.

Unfortunately for Ella, Abraham, and those who’ve helped them promote their hoax, Ella’s change of heart directly contradicts her own claim that all three people were deeply involved:

(from the document Ella read onscreen, naming multiple alleged ‘cult’ members)

The admission from Ella also contradicts Abe’s statement during the Jean-Clement Yaohirou video.

This screenshot from Kris Costa’s “DDH” blog confirms it: 

And worst of all, Ella’s confession directly contradicts what she and Abraham forced the children to say on camera. Here’s an extract from the Jean-Clement video:

Child Q: Me, and my sister, and my brother don’t have tattoos. 
Jean-Clement: No tattoos? 
Q: No. If my mum was doing it, if my mum was touching me, I would have had a tattoo right now. 
JC: Why is that—
Abe: Tell him about your brother Xxxxx, tell him about your brother.
Q: Yeah, he doesn’t have it yet, no. 
Abe: But tell him what he does.
Q: He does…he touches us, he does, um, sex to us. 
Abe: Tell him about…listen to this. Her first husband, basically they picked her. They picked her. They selected her, the mother, they selected her. First husband, he’s one…(aside to child: Shush!)…he’s one, he’s an investment banker. He does, he has a baby with her, and the boy, he done sex with the boy, 17 years….Her first husband. She left him. Her first husband told the second guy, go and get her.

And another, from the videos made en route to London:

Ella: What is decided?
Child P: We decided that we shall stop killing babies and we shall stop doing sex. It’s just going to be pointless and it’s just going to have to be going to jail and go back.
Ella: So what are we going to do?  We are going to protect other babies and children, huh? And save all the children that are involved.
Child P: Yes. And [Xxxxx] was in it.
Child Q: When you face the fear you get less fear.

And now, more contradictions…

We are always amazed at the information that can be gleaned from going over old evidence. This time we were looking through the transcript of a video Angela Power-Disney released, of a conversation between herself and Sabine in April 2016.

Keep in mind that this was more than a year before Ella made her spectacularly contradictory gaffe.

Angie: Like, [Ella’s ex-husband] was in the cult, the children, the full Jean-Clement recordings, said that their stepbrother [named] had molested them, or Ella said this or somebody….

Sabine: No, on that note, I asked—I met [Ella’s son], and I asked Ella whether she had asked him about it, and she said she couldn’t talk to him about it, but she was going to ask her mum to do that.

Let’s pause on that.

Sabine says that she asked Ella about whether she had asked her eldest child about having been in the “cult”.

Ella’s response: she couldn’t talk to him about it, but she was going to ask her own mother to do it for her.

Now, if you were the parent of a child, even an almost-grown one, and you believed that he might have been brutally sexually abused since early childhood, and then forced to sexually abuse others including his own half-siblings, would you hesitate even a nano-second before asking him about it and then immediately trying to ensure his safety? Would you shrug it off and get the child’s grandmother to do it?

Angie: ….. But I definitely heard, out of the mouth of [inaudible], that the children had said [her son] had molested them. [Break out the champagne, Angela has said something factually correct!—Ed.]

Sabine: No…

Angie: …and I’m 90% sure I’ve seen…unless they’re forged, I’ve seen police records documenting violence by [her son].

Sabine: I’m sorry Angie, [Child Q] said [her son] is in it, and I asked Ella is it your [son], and that’s why, and I met him…

Angie: It is her [son], it is her [son], that’s my sense of it. I’m useless at archiving, I’ll try and find what I’m referring to. I wouldn’t say that lightly, Sabine.

So first Sabine denies that the older boy was involved in the “cult”, and then she back-pedals and says that she questioned Ella about this (while they were still on speaking terms), and then met the son in person, to decide whether or not the allegation was true.

In other words, even Sabine wasn’t certain that the allegations against the elder son were correct. When asked, Ella seems to have waffled, saying she “couldn’t talk to him about it”.

And yet as far back as late 2014/early 2015 all parties were fully aware that the children and Abe had made allegations about the elder son. Everyone had seen the videos and knew what the children had said.

But amongst themselves, they were casting doubt on the children’s supposedly 100% true testimony.

Makes you think, doesn’t it?

---

Please note: Sabine McNeill is currently facing trial on charges of violation of a restraining order and harassment. While this post does not touch on either of those two issues, we’d like to remind our readers that any discussion of her case could not only prejudice her right to a fair trial, but could put this blog in danger of committing contempt of court.