Tracey and Belinda debate: Who leaked the videos?

Since Belinda began crowd-funding to raise money to pay the security which would allow Sabine out of prison until the time of her trial, the remaining conspiranoids are rushing about like a flock of demented geese, squawking and honking and pecking at one another. It seems that some of them have begun to come to the terrifying realisation that shit has indeed got very real. Sabine’s £20,000 security and 19 criminal charges are a grim reminder that for the past three years the Hoaxtead mob have been playing with the lives of real people, and that this could carry very real consequences.

We noted with grim amusement that a number of the Hoaxtead mobsters have begun to trot out the old chestnut that “Sabine didn’t release the videos of RD’s children first”. Rather, the story goes, the videos were relased on the dark web or Facebook, take your pick, several months before Sabine did it, if indeed she did. Confused yet?

The Tracey Morris version

In a statement read outside the Colindale police station in August 2015, Tracey Morris spun us this story, her heroic attempt to exonerate Sabine. We reported last year:

The gist of it is that Tracey got the scoop on the entire world, as she just so happens to know a not-at-all-crazy person named Conrad Hendricks, who hails from Swindon, who just so happened to have faxed Tracey a handwritten affidavit attesting that he’d not only dug up the videos of RD’s children on the ‘dark web’, but had attempted multiple times to post them on his Facebook page.

According to Tracey and the not-even-a-little-bit-mad Mr Hendricks, all of this occurred on or about 14 November 2014, more than two months before Sabine was alleged to have released the videos to Veterans Today and TheTapBlog.

Uncharacteristically, Facebook not only deleted the posts on poor Mr Hendricks, but they deleted his entire account…multiple times! [Wow, they must have altered their Community Guidelines since then! –Ed.] …

Mr Hendricks’ finely crafted affidavit, whether it came from the pen of a complete nutter or not, was of absolutely no use, and had no bearing on Sabine’s release when it eventually happened.

However, something about (the date of the affidavit)—14 November 2014—struck us as odd. It’s interesting that on that date, Sabine uploaded Ella’s “witness statement” to her Dropbox, from whence it would eventually be leaked to Veterans Today and TheTapBlog.

So there is a glancing possibility that somehow, Mr Hendricks was given access to Sabine’s Dropbox, published the videos, and then had them removed. Though why Facebook would remove them when at that time they were not nearly as controversial as they became later is anyone’s guess. Just one of those great mysteries of life, we suppose.

The Belinda McKenzie version

For a slightly less confabulated version of how the videos were released, however, we turn to Belinda McKenzie herself, who posted a piece called “Lady of the Leak” to her Knight Foundation blog in July 2015. We’re going to reproduce the post in its entirety, as we believe it reveals a great deal about how the videos were released, and about Belinda’s willingness to slough off blame onto her partner.

The fact that Belinda’s blog was later deleted may or may not be meaningful; we know that Belinda has a habit of making statements and then covering her tracks. So hurrah for the Internet Archive! As they say, nothing ever really dies on the internet.

day 12 of Belinda’s ‘massive national opportunity’ blog, July 2015  

As those who have been following the so-called Hampstead SRA case know, one of its casualties is my colleague in the Association of McKenzie Friends Sabine McNeill who is responsible for having leaked the home-videos of the 2 whistle-blower children to a blogger in February of this year, with the inevitable result that they instantly went viral on the internet. As a consequence the court & police came after her and she was forced to flee the UK or face arrest.

What prompted this fatal action on Sabine’s part is best explained with reference to human psychology rather than there being any deliberate intention to damage the case or imperil the parties, of which Sabine has since been accused; at the time of writing she and indeed our Association as a whole are being branded as ‘saboteurs’ of this and other cases, including by the children’s mother Ella in her last but one interview.

Assuming the children are to be handed to their father as still seems horribly likely (but WE THE PUBLIC can prevent this – all it needs is massive collective action!) it will not be surprising to me therefore if we/our Association will be cast as the SCAPEGOATS for having caused this to happen. McKenzie Friends, McKenzie Enemies and now McKenzie Scapegoats! We could perform a great new public service taking the blame when things go wrong in these cases!

There is no denying that Sabine, indeed all of us are strong believers in what she calls ‘the publicity route’ as opposed to allowing the family courts to carry on with their business of destroying families absent of external scrutiny, as the judges and LA legal teams of course infinitely prefer! In fact, I have on my desk what she published on her most popular blog: Publicity is the very soul of Justice.

It is highly doubtful however that exposing a case will ever change the final outcome as the vast majority of these cases where children are targeted for removal are pre-determined. There is a governmental policy in place to take more and more children into state care year-on-year and for the process particularly of adoption to be speeded up. Moreover, so far the courts and the local authorities have had the upper hand precisely for the reason that they are NOT being watched and the mass of the public continue to be unaware of these scams; unless you and your children are directly affected how would you have any idea this terrible, orchestrated assault on children and families is happening in our country in 2015?

By the same token, without anyone exposing what is going on how can the public get a realistic grasp of the sheer measure of the problem? The only antidote to this totally unethical, unjust and downright cruel policy plus individual examples thereof IS exposure, that is for very sure and for Sabine and me by now it is the only way forward; she exposes on-line and I on the street but our hearts beat as one. Veteran McKenzie Friend Ian Josephs, publisher of www.forced-adoption.com: recommends exposure, exposure, exposure. Also, after over 50 years of experience, he advises mothers NOT to report the crimes of abusive fathers to the police: you lose your children!

Nevertheless we freely concede there are ways of ‘exposing’ most effectively in individual cases; the timing has to be right and if videos of children giving witness evidence are to be put up on YouTube etc., by what appears to be majority agreement it is best to blur their faces and distort their voices. We were told by the children’s mum, Ella that she and her partner Abraham were working on producing a ‘digest’ of the home-videos with the children’s faces blurred; at some suitable moment when they decided the time was right these would be launched on the world. Personally I would have been content to wait until they had completed their video, besides I was still leery of publishing anything until the conclusion of the Fact-Finding hearing, having given an ‘undertaking’ to Mrs Justice Pauffley in the first hearing before her on 13^th January to maintain confidentiality and she having told me that this undertaking would have the force of an Order. [Translation: It wasn’t my fault, I would have waited; it’s totally down to Sabine.]

So it was somewhat of a shock to me to say the least when the children’s faces suddenly began appearing all over the internet as of a morning in February and I puzzled to understand what had prompted this intemperate action on the part of my colleague? At the same time I freely admit I also half-welcomed it as I’d been feeling increasingly frustrated by the slow progress of the case plus the clear bias of the judge against the mother and towards the father. [Translation: I had nothing to do with this! You could have knocked me over with a feather!]

Which brings me back to the psychological factors here. Sabine had been sitting on this horrific case ever since early November; I’d joined in a little later. It had felt to the two of us like sitting on a powder-keg which could at any moment blow all of us up. Yet at the same time getting off the powder-keg was not an option either as we were now on it; we already knew way too much about the case, having seen the paperwork as well as having viewed both the police interviews of the children as well as the original home-videos. The only option in my mind therefore was to stay put and try to stay as calm and quiet as possible until the moment was right to light the taper, having ensured it would be the father and his unspeakably horrible cult who would receive the full force of the explosive impact. Speaking in purely metaphorical terms of course – for me those who have followed evil ways not natural to humanity need help not punishment, having almost certainly been ritually abused themselves during their own childhoods; this is very much an inter-generational cycle needing to be broken.

By the last of the 3 hearings in January it was clear to me and the mother which way the case was going and what the final outcome therefore was likely to be; Mrs Pauffley was already showing definite bias towards the father. Coming out of court on 26th January I declared to my colleagues “she’s going to give the children to D! (the father).”

This was too much to bear or to contemplate for Sabine. Something had to be done! As she and others in our group said, all the while we were dithering around and the ineffably inappropriate ‘family court’ processes had been grinding on children were possibly continuing to be abused in horrible ways in Hampstead and babies murdered! I should point out that at least 2 in our McKenzie Friends core group have long-term experience and knowledge of SRA and we have always taken the children’s initial allegations entirely seriously; we KNOW this stuff goes on.

So when at our next meeting with Ella and Abraham they still hadn’t got their home-video digest ready Sabine simply lost patience and moved into online action. She and Ella had already agreed on the text of the petition which was removed after having attracted nearly 16,000 signatures in 2 months!

Sabine as she says with pride is German/Slavic, meaning she is a person of strong passions and principle, especially her passion for justice and her love of children despite having had none of her own. This has always moved me in respect of Sabine; she is as true a mother as I am having brought 4 children into the world! We could literally feel her blood beginning to boil as collusion between Barnet Council and the judge came to light as well as her bias towards one party in the case. She was more than usually snappy and especially snappy with Abraham whom she suspected of wanting to commandeer our meetings, over which she had always presided, being way the most energetic, proactive and productive of us. She always had a to-do list and some new impeccably-sourced and elegantly-presented document on the boil. Sabine is positively brilliant at preparing documents FAST, no matter what the issue may be. [Translation: Sabine is the real boss of this group, and was in control of this case. Not Belinda. Really.]

Sabine thought Ella and Abe were dragging their feet over their proposed video, why weren’t they bucking up more to save Ella’s children, could the problem be Abraham and his influence over Ella?! Sabine just didn’t get on with Abraham; it was a pure clash of personalities. The rest of us had less of a problem with this slightly eccentric gentleman, least of all me who had been honoured to be invited to Ella’s home to consume a mug of the marvellous �?green juice’ compounded of fresh fruits, vegetables and hemp-seeds which Abraham is busy promoting as the elixir of life. Referred to deprecatingly by Pauffley as �?cannabis soup’ this highly nutritious, health-giving and delicious liquid food can help everyone stay healthy and beat cancer and all manner of other diseases. [Funny; Sabine practically fawned over Abe in the BBC4 Melanie Abbott interview! Is Belinda saying Sabine was being insincere?]

I have recounted this bit of the inside story of the case so that people out there who are trying to puzzle it all out can begin to put together these pieces of the jigsaw and understand how the leak came about and the psychological factors that caused it. [Translation: Sabine is a nutter, and she acted alone. Belinda had nothing to do with it.]

When emotions begin to run high in any social situation anything can happen and often does, that is all. Sabine is not to be blamed or blackened for ‘inadvertently’ leaking the videos which she did late at night, never the best time to take any kind of drastic action but all too easy when it requires only one last click of the mouse before succumbing to sleep. Above all else, she addressed her email to the then Home Secretary Teresa May, published it on the petition that Ella had asked her to promote, copied her and blind-copied the Tap blogger. He later explained that the explosion had already happened on Facebook due to the update of the petition that contained the email to Teresa May! [Translation: To ensure maximum impact, Sabine sent the videos to Henry Curteis at The Tap Blog, and published the letter containing the link to the videos on the petition.]

Before joining in with the scapegoating of Sabine and the vilifying of the Association of McKenzie Friends as saboteurs who have caused this case to fail we need to ask ourselves the question: Had the videos NOT been leaked and the case have continued to be conducted under a veil of secrecy as Mrs Pauffley originally hoped, is it likely that the outcome would have been any different?

We say firmly NO, it would have made no difference whatsoever. THERE NEVER WAS ANY INTENTION TO RETURN THE CHILDREN TO THEIR MOTHER. That’s what both Ella and I told Sabine after the hearing on 26^th January where the Position Statement was ignored that �?in a thinly veiled threat’ announced online exposure. [Translation: Not our fault. Get it? Nothing is our fault. Nothing at all.]

To return the children to their mother would have been/would be far too dangerous for all involved in the cult! Nor to their grandparents for the same reason – the children would have been rehabilitated and in the safety of Russia they would have continued to blow the whistle. They had to be retained under the control of the cult of which Mrs Justice Pauffley seems to be some kind of ‘friend’ or benign associate; either that or she is chronically naïve but I fear it is the former. Only today a mother has written to me saying that Mrs Pauffley took her daughter away from her and handed the child over to the care of her abusive father who is a senior police officer. She ends her email with the question “does she (Mrs P) have a history of this?” Well hopefully other parents of children miss-placed by this judge will write in to us – we need to show her up for who she really is and fast, before she does any more damage. But again as Ian Josephs has observed over more than 50 years, she is not alone!

In the fullness of time when all this has come right as it is going to do, this matter of the leak will have faded from our minds and will have been overlaid by public appreciation of Sabine, as of the mother Ella and her brave children and Abraham who helped them tell their story. This case still has the potential to change everything for the better in this dark world and I continue to steadfastly believe it will. I also believe with hindsight that the children’s beautiful faces actually needed to be seen without being blanked out or blurred. Ella herself told me that she considered her children have a special role to play in human destiny. [Translation: “the children’s beautiful faces actually needed to be seen” = “we knew people would love a pair of sweet blonde kids talking about anal sex and murder…it’s a surefire winner!”]

Meanwhile my dear friend continues to do amazing work at the EU level and it is directly thanks to Sabine that awareness of this case and many others is galvanising European leaders to challenge the UK over its liberal and licentious attitude to child abuse in all its ugly forms. On Tuesday of this coming week Sabine will be once again in Brussels presenting the latest of her powerful reports to the Petitions Committee:

https://mckenzies4fairness.files.wordpress.com/2015/07/15-07-12-adoption-without-consent.pdf

Let’s hear it for once for the �?lady of the leak’ Sabine and her steadfast effort over many years for the abused and wronged of UK society, especially the children.

POSTSCRIPT  The Association of McKenzie Friends did not leak the list of those named as being involved in the cult. Other hands than ours have been at work in this regard. We very much regret and deplore the distress and damage caused to possibly innocent parties. We lay the blame at the door of the police who closed the investigation down prematurely. It needs to be re-opened and the names of all who have been wrongly-accused cleared.  [Translation: Nothing is ever our fault. And we’re not saying the “possibly innocent parties” are guilty, but they probably are.]

Still with us after all that?

We find it fascinating that Belinda doesn’t even bother to try and claim that Sabine didn’t release the videos. Rather, she tries to justify it on the grounds that it was an “emergency” and that Sabine’s emotions got the better of her. Not for Belinda any fairy stories about people finding the videos on the dark web and unsuccessfully trying to post them on Facebook—no, she goes straight for her colleague Sabine, and chucks her under the nearest passing vehicle.