We’ve said it before and we’ll say it again: there’s nothing quite so fascinating and deeply satisfying as watching the Hampstead SRA hoax pushers tear one another to shreds, metaphorically speaking of course. And during the past week we’ve been spoilt for choice.
Round 1: Charlotte v Belinda
It started with Charlotte Alton Ward’s shot across Belinda’s bow.
Among other improbabilities, she claimed that:
- The entire hoax was an “MK Ultra psy op”;
- Belinda was at best a dupe of “the guilty parties”, including but not limited to Sabine McNeill and Kristie Sue Costa (who Charlotte accused of being Sabine’s “handler”);
- This blog’s longevity has been due to “large amounts of money” being paid out from MK Ultra’s “endless black budgets”;
- Belinda did a deal with the police to avoid prosecution;
- Charlotte’s Hamster Research blog supported abused children;
- Her blog, her emails, and her MacBook laptop computer had been hacked by persons associated with MK Ultra, Belinda, or some combination thereof, and the number 69 had something to do with it.
Needless to say, Belinda was less than impressed with this analysis, and wrote back in her typical thin-lipped style. She berated Charlotte for repaying her hospitality with such unkind allegations. In turn, she claimed that
- Charlotte was probably only annoyed at Sabine and Kristie Sue because the latter had called Charlotte a Luciferian;
- Belinda had been “dead set” against Rupert Quaintance coming to the UK; but…
- Contrary to Rupert’s defence arguments at his trial, he had actually come to the UK because of “very unpleasant people in a certain area…he came to face them up”;
- She had also been “dead set” against the demonstrations outside Christ Church Hampstead;
- She hadn’t done a deal with the police;
- Sabine didn’t “beg” to take on the Hampstead case, and had not been the first person to release the videos;
- She expects that Sabine will end up in prison in 2018.
All in all, most satisfactory.
Round 2: Charlotte rallies
On 20 November, Charlotte struck back. She claimed that the Hampstead hoax, which she had supported unequivocally until late 2015 when Kristie Sue and the late Maria MacMahon turfed her out of the Sooper Seekrit Facebook Groop™, was nothing more than a psy op (by whom and for what purpose we really cannot tell).
She then launched into an attack on Angela Power-Disney. She claimed that Angie had “lured” both Jake Clarke and Rupert Quaintance into supporting the hoax (and we really cannot argue with her on that point).
Then Charlotte asked the $600,000 question: “So if it’s all that serious, all these innocent alleged offenders, why haven’t YOU BOTH gone down? It could be down to the inequalities of the ‘legal system’. But if so, WHY do you keep supporting it and luring parents into it?”
Oh, and for good measure she tossed in a suggestion that Sabine might have hired someone to break her own window, presumably to make herself look like she was being victimised. Interesting if true.
She also accused Sabine and her mate Kristie Sue of “information gathering”—using Charlotte’s alleged research without her permission.
One interesting titbit: Charlotte stated, “I am a pisshead, as you are…”, implying that she and Belinda are both alcoholics. We have absolutely no evidence that this is the case, although some of our commenters say they have seen Belinda drinking the dregs from strangers’ wine glasses in pubs. Still, that could be an excess of frugality, not an addiction to alcohol. Hard to say really.
Round 3: Angela v Charlotte
Surprisingly, it took Angela until 24 November to cobble together a response to Charlotte’s allegations that she had lured both Rupert and Jake into the hoax. We reported on it here; here’s a brief summary:
Angie: I did not engage in luring with those men. In fact, you lured me into supporting the hoax.
[False: Angela started posting about the hoax in early February. Unless she can show that this was as a result of “luring” by Charlotte, we will continue to reject this excuse.]
Angie: If Rupert doesn’t watch his step when he gets out of prison, I will destroy him.
[Probably true. That’s how Angie rolls. “Vindictive” is her middle name, we are told.]
And that brings us to…
Round 4: Yolande v Angela
Shortly after Angela’s email on 24 November, Yolande (somewhat confusingly) shot back:
On Nov 24, 2017 16:02, Yolande Lindridge <YolandeLindridge@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Angela Power-Disney, please can you explain to myself and Sussex Police how you have got hold of a confidential email to Sussex Police? Charlotte Ward aka Jacqui Farmer emailed me this morning that she had been emailing Sussex Police but when I questioned her about her email she did not reply? Eugene Lubjanenko
went to prison for 8 months today and I have a hearing at the Royal Courts of Justice on 5.12.2017 about a re-run of the referendum. Leave me alone.
I sent a group email reply 4 days ago to Jacqui aka Charlotte’s email 2 days earlier ie that she had emailed last Saturday, please stop trying to involve me in your 2 Russian/LibDem hoaxes (Hampstead’s Ella & Lubjanenko) involving the Association of McKenzie Friends’ LibDem sponsor, John Hemming MP to distract
from real child sex abuse scandals.
What does all this mean?
What have the Sussex Police got to do with the price of eggs in Egypt? How does the imprisonment of Eugene Lubjanenko relate to anything? Why is Yolande obsessed with John Hemming?
Your guess, dear reader, is as good as ours.
However, that was just the opening salvo. It was followed by another attack from Angela, who really seems to be hitting her stride, pagga-wise:
From: angela power <angelapowerba@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: 24 November 2017 20:17
To: Yolande Lindridge
Subject: Re: More evidence that Hampstead is an MK Ultra psy op
Yolande Kenward Lindridge Gordon
It is discombobulating and ironic to receive an e mail from YOU saying LEAVE ME ALONE as I am ongoingly confounded by the e mail lists to which you circulate!!!
I simply press REPLY ALL so you must go back to source ie YOUR SELF to find out how and why who replied to whom.
Yes I know Eugene got months today and Yes I know Hampstead was to a great degree an inside Russian mafia job.
By the way I will ‘RE ITERATE Sabine, love her or otherwise did NOT leak the damning children’s testimony videos in the 1st 2nd or possibly 3rd instances…they were FIRST released to Russian media online around November 2014….they were ALSO released on the dark web and picked up by an activist who then released them on the normal web and testified to same in order to clear Sabine of the charges of release …..she is 72 or 73 and likely to go to prison for this bloody misinformation!!
Your stance sometimes Yolande smacks of racism even to me …I am FAR from a social justice warrior and mourn the loss of national identity in England but
ABSOLUTELY recognise that the children of foreign nationals are targeted by the UK government child trafficking network .
I Still implore you to quit consulting psychics and research your beloved Duke of Kent with regard to international elite paedophilia and blackmail
Wait, what? Now Angela thinks that “Hampstead was to a great degree an inside Russian mafia job”?
That’s a new one on us. Granted, it does seem likely these days that Pizzagate was to some extent manipulated by the Russians in an effort to interfere with the U.S. election which was happening then; but to say that Angie’s latest hypothesis is ludicrous would be a serious understatement. (See also her utterly false claims that the hoax was started by Ella, and that Ella was involved in creating child sex abuse videos.)
And to reiterate, although we have seen no evidence to confirm the story that “someone else released the videos first”, it matters not whether Sabine was first to put them online or one hundred and first. She did it, and she knew full well that she was in violation of the law when she did it. And that’s as far as we are willing to go, given that Sabine is currently facing criminal charges about her activities.
A day after receiving Angela’s email, Yolande responded:
From: Yolande Lindridge <YolandeLindridge@xxxxxxxx>
To: angela power <angelapowerba@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat,25 Nov 2017 16:4837 +0000
I repeat. LEAVE ME ALONE. I am a witness and you, in my opinion, are deliberately trying to interfere with criminal investigations. I have a hearing about my Brexit challenge on 5.12.2017 in the Royal Courts of Justice, whilst those you side with are that day holding a demonstration outside the Justice Ministry.
What has happened to Clare Douglas and myself yesterday is disgraceful and requires police investigation. Kent Police gave me incident reference 23/1210. [Sorry, no idea—Ed.]
I have been advised that you and Tracey Morris aka cronies of the Association of McKenzie Friends, are trying to support Eugene Lukjaneko legally and otherwise, we are on opposing sides as I am a witness and a victim. There is another court hearing listed next month. Moreover whilst Eugene Lukjanenko was appearing in the Canterbury Combined Courts yesterday morning, Bridgend BC were in the Cardiff Combined Courts getting a hearing there next Friday morning for the same charges that Eugene faced with his main follower re roof-top protests. Again I am a victim of this woman and a potential court witness.
All my communications have been hacked for years. Facebook still does nothing to deal with serious hate crime and threats, which was stooping in Kent to its normal very low levels last night with a comment ‘Dead hahahaha’ above a hacked private photo of 3 young children in Clare Douglas’ immediate family. Hackers will therefore have copies of emails re the German Sabine McNeill, including her telling me that she copied in a blogger to one of her emails who then put videos of the 2 Hampstead kids on the internet. I am NOT responsible for the decisions that the Association of McKenzie Friends and their sponsors make.
For 3 years, the Association of McKenzie Friends/their cronies have been trying to get me associated with the Russian Hampstead hoax. Via the Association of McKenzie Friends I got duped re Eugene Lukjanenko, RT et al.
Every single one of the Association of McKenzie Friends/their cronies hada bad attitude to me over my Brexit challenge and its intended outcome of reforming UK child protection laws and protecting the NHS from collapse by Maidstone’s Tories & LibDems – indeed Belinda McKenzie was actively working in tandem with Maidstone Tory & LibDem politicians to get me silenced/stopped/sectioned/socially isolated and not because I am mentally ill, but as a way of controlling and bringing an end to my Brexit challenge.
I have nothing but respect for the Duke of Kent, that is why I have been helping to bring down those who undermine him via their competing international network of masons run from Maidstone in Kent.
I have NEVER been part of the Association of McKenzie Friends, Sabine McNeill sub-contracted her children’s cases to me as no one in the Association of McKenzie Friends had the skills to do this work.
LEAVE ME ALONE. STOP TRYING TO INTERFERE, YET AGAIN, WITH POLICE INVESTIGATIONS & COURTS.
I NEVER WANT TO HEAR FROM YOU OR ANY OF YOUR CRONIES EVER AGAIN. DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL.
Lay Legal Adviser to Clare Douglas. Kent Businesswoman of the Year 1996
Witness to serious crimes involving powerful people
And there you have it, folks.
Will Angela ignore Yolande’s demand to leave her alone?
Will we hear more from Belinda and Charlotte?
What has the Duke of Kent to do with any of this?
We’ll be keeping a close watch on the situation, and will be reporting updates as they come in. So stay tuned for the next episode of…Trooferdale.