Friday night at the fights: Angie v Charlotte in troofer throwdown

Earlier this week we brought you a most entertaining battle between Belinda McKenzie and her erstwhile protegée Charlotte Ward. Today we’ll update you on the Belinda/Charlotte pagga, and bring you a new instalment: Angela “Puffer” Power-Disney versus Charlotte “It’s for medicinal purposes” Alton Ward. Pour yourself a cuppa, and get comfortable—this could take a while.

A few words from Belinda


Just to let you know, Butlincat has sent my reply to you yesterday to Hoaxtead so that puts paid to any further ‘public’ correspondence between us, but probably it’s enough anyway.

TTYL privately.

B x

Well damn. We were quite looking forward to Belinda’s next contribution. Ah well…we suppose all good things must come to an end.

Angela gives Charlotte a piece of her mind (alleged)

First, a reminder of what Charlotte said about Angie in her most recent rant:

Next, Angie, I love you very dearly, you know that. But it looks to me as if you lured Rupert in. I may be wrong. And there is a young man called Jake whose story I know NOTHING about. Did you know Jake? Was he lured in? I I saw he had been sectioned or something. What really happened? It may be nothing – I’ve no idea. It may be that he is also under mind control or part of the psy op. Whatever, I wish him well and wonder, if he is genuine, whether he regrets ever getting involved?

Angela sat on this for a while, then responded yesterday, pretty much exactly on schedule:

From: angela power <angelapowerba@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: 24 November 2017 14:38:37
To: Belinda McKenzie; jacquifarmer1984@xxxxxxxxxxxx; ‘Jake Loves’
Cc: ‘Yolande Lindridge’; ‘Sabine K McNeill’; ‘Tom Dobbie’; bae146@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; giles.york@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; mark.rowley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; mbaker@xxxxxxxxxxx; benjamin.watts@xxxxxxxxxxx;
peter4peter2@xxxxxxxxxxx; jeanjames@xxxxxxxxx; annette-rose-smih@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; sam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; denise.fitch@xxxxxxxxxxx; colin-peters2@xxxxxxx; theresapay17@xxxxxxxxxxx; antineoconsusa@xxxxxxx; ‘Mary Rooney’; ‘Chris Goromonzi’; ‘Charles Goromonzi’; ‘margaret Musarurwa’; ‘Terry Armstrong’; ‘Andy Theodorou’; ‘Emma anderson’; ‘maureen spalek’; ‘Maurice Kirk’; ‘Kudzanayi Goromonzi’; ‘Melissa Hendry’; ‘Mel Huggett’; ‘BHUPESHKUMAR NAVINCHANDRA PATEL’; ‘Inin Vadim A.’; ‘Clare Douglas’; ‘Malcolm Denyer’; inquiries@xxxxxxxxxx; jack@xxxxxxxxxxxx; ‘Patriots Freelist’; ‘ZDANOKA Tatjana’; ‘Mr Raiman’; ‘Martin Browne’; ‘Christopher Sims’; ‘Diana Z’; ‘John Banks’; ‘Dafydd Morgan Packaging Plus’; ‘Alex Fung’; annette-rose-smith@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; ‘john TIMBRELL’; ‘Mile Ilic’; ‘pamela almaz’; ‘Nigel Ward’; ‘Terence’; ‘Norman Scarth’; ‘albert burgess’; ‘Clive Driscoll’; ‘Claire mom’; ‘clairendanny evans’; southeasttoday@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: More evidence that Hampstead is an MK Ultra psy op

Gosh again if this e mail is to a select few I would hate to see a mass mail out lol!

Your repeated assertion J(acqui) F(armer) aka C(harlotte) W(ard) that I LURED Rupert to London to make him a patsy caused me depression, sadness and anger yesterday but I resisted the knee-jerk reaction of lashing out either to punish you or clear my name at least for 24 hours. If you work on your logic, I would have a VERY GOOD CASE for saying YOU lured ME on to the front line of this case including having me drive 300 miles out of my way to interview the head of a satanic cult on your recommendation!! You lulled me in to a false sense of trusting you and I did so to an extent I rarely do. To hear you turning on me and disguising it by saying I am still under mind control is another life lesson sadly in not trusting….

But Angie, aren’t you always saying that you’re still under mind control from your childhood MK Ultra Sooper-Soldier™ training? We’re sure we’ve heard you use that as an excuse for…well, pretty much everything, actually. Are you saying it’s not true? Colour us disillusioned….

Neelu as far as I recall was the one who organised the weekly protest outside Hampstead Christchurch and if she did, fair play to her! BM organised monthly networking and strategy meetings in the form of picnics on the nearby Heath from which the word HEATHEN derives. I flew from Ireland and attended one of each and followed all online activity connected with these worthy protests too. I since discovered uncomfortable facts about many of the players involved including Detective R(ay) S(avage) and many on this thread. I have shared those facts and allegations with integrity [AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!—Ed.] and continue to try and navigate through this mess.

You mentioned J(ake) C(larke) JF aka CW as being another possible ´victim´of my enticement in your scenario in your head…..unlike Rupert, JC kept a clearer head and would I have no doubt assure you that HE chose to campaign and advocate as he did, and HE approached me in the course of doing so. HE turned down an offer by DC P(aul) S(peer) to implicate me in exchange for leniency BECAUSE IT WAS A FALSE PREMISE THAT I ENTICED HIM OR RUPERT OR ANYONE ELSE into joining the fight for justice for (RD’s children).

Hmm. That’s not what we heard, Angie. But do go on….

I prefer to hold out hope that Rupert will honour his highest intentions shared with me on many occasions….that despite controversy and chaos, his efforts usually ended up with successful outcomes [Erm…she knows he’s in prison, right?—Ed.]….that he is the person people love to hate but he gets the job done….that he knows what he is doing when he is operating from his highest self and a student of THE ART OF WAR he will turn out to be a hero and not Poor Rupert the Patsy …the role that activates not empathy but disempowering sympathy in many frustrated Mother types. [Is that a shot at Belinda?—Ed.]

If Rupert on the other hand continues the blame game or vulnerable victim thing and that necessitates discrediting and villifying (sic) me, I will respond accordingly ….Isaiah 54 says EVERY TONGUE THAT RISES UP AGAINST US IN JUDGEMENT WE SHALL CONDEMN AND SHOW TO BE IN THE WRONG and Yes I can be mean too with righteous anger. [Understatement of the century?—Ed.]

Again I recommend renouncing WITCHCRAFT, NEW AGE ism and certainly LUCIFERIANISM to all who truly want this case whether interrupted psy op or not to be RESOLVED in the childrens (sic) best interests which I feel it HAS NOT and frankly they and children everywhere are my primary concern. JF aka CW if you address e mails ABOUT me in future without including me to defend inaccuracies I will have no choice but to go public in a video. [Angie: DO IT! DO IT! DO IT!—Ed.] I very much wanted to yesterday, but today prefer to pray for you with a firm warning that you crossed the line and I am disappointed.

Love and prayers….as well as empathy for all being targetted especially over this case. And I HAVE endured severe targetting tho not arrest, sectioning etc. [Yet…—Ed.] and if you would have me explain supernatural protection it would take revelation and time… is a wonderful thing I heard the other day….AI, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE will never be able to imitate REVELATION KNOWLEDGE!!


It seems the question of who lured whom into the Hoaxtead quagmire looms large for many: Charlotte thinks Angie lured Rupert and Jake; Angie thinks Charlotte lured her; and we wonder what Rupert would have to say in the matter? Also, are we the only ones chuckling under our breaths at Angela’s admission that she can be a vindictive bitch when she’s crossed (or even when she’s not)?

We’d love to hear more from Angela about Ray Savage, the alleged former police officer who claimed to have interviewed Ella for 3.5 hours, and who had a steamy illicit romance with HoaxGirl back in the day.

And inquiring minds want to know: when is Angela going to tell the truth about what happened between her and Rupert? We’ve had various tantalising leaks from people (ahem) close to the source, but we’d like to hear it straight from the horse’s mouth. So to speak.

Post script

And now, a few closing words from Jake “The Dormouse” Clarke:

From: Jake Loves <truthlightdark@xxxxxxxxx>

To: angela power <angelapowerba@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2017 17:01:30 +0000

Thank you Angie. So much love to you and all. 🙂

Yeah, that’s awesome, Jake. Now do be a good boy and stow it.

Thanks to the reader who’s been so helpful lately, and wishes to all for an enjoyable weekend…stay tuned for the next round of Hoaxtead mobster pagga action, coming soon to a blog near you!

141 thoughts on “Friday night at the fights: Angie v Charlotte in troofer throwdown

  1. Who doesn’t love a Friday fight night? Very interesting read indeed EC. I thought exactly the same way you did when Angie mentioned mind control. Apparently she is only still under mind control when it suits her and not when someone else says she is under it.

    Liked by 4 people

  2. I’m enjoying reading all those ‘blame game’ emails between them.

    Rupert Q, Jake C, Arthur K.. were definitely lured in by Angie and look what happened to them all.
    She encouraged them in so many videos and we all saw it with our own eyes!

    Liked by 4 people

    • All seen with our own eyes…in her own videos, which are still up! No attention is bad attention – right, Angie?

      Liked by 2 people

    • 100% with you on that Jake Blake.

      What has happened to Arthur K?

      As for Jake Clarke the psychiatrist/psychologist he is declaring someone has DID, Dissociative something Disorder.

      Hasn’t DID been decided by a lot of Mental Health experts to be a false diagnosis?

      Liked by 1 person

      • I have that disorder too, I wouldn’t wish it on anyone. The thing is, about mental health experts is, they don’t really know. There are many different types of mental health experts who believe in many different things.


  3. I had to laugh when Angie stated that Rupert “is a student of THE ART OF WAR”, lol. I guess that as he is currently banged up in one of our prisons that he couldn’t have been a very good student at all.

    Liked by 5 people

  4. The real conspiracy here, is how are all these scumbags still walking the streets?
    They should all be in prison.

    Liked by 4 people

  5. Can anyone recall that Rupert once boasted that if we were to look up the word Power i think it was in the dictionary, then we would see a picture of his legs. Well i decided to finally check out his claim today and he was right, there is a picture of his legs.

    Liked by 2 people

  6. Oh no Belinda, please share your passive aggressive emails, they were very entertaining & I have run out of The Secret Seven books & the stories of the baddie’s machinations to conquer the world, therefore please reconsider your stance!

    ” Your repeated assertion J(acqui) F(armer) aka C(harlotte) W(ard) that I LURED Rupert to London to make him a patsy caused me depression, sadness and anger yesterday but I resisted the knee-jerk reaction of lashing out either to punish you or clear my name at least for 24 hours.”

    Punish you? Hohoho, that’s scary talk! 😂😂😂

    Liked by 3 people

    • Those long black gloves that Angie likes to wear do have the air of a dominatrix looking to dish out some punishment to some poor soul. Perhaps that’s how Angie affords her fags and time away in Lanzarote.

      Liked by 4 people

    • Angela hasn’t a clue what depression is if she thinks it lasts 24 hours.

      I’ve seen her type similar nonsense before.

      I think she means fed up.

      Fcuking idiot she is.

      You did lure him Angela, most people with half a brain that have followed your flirting with Rupert, blah de blah, know this.

      Such a shame that Rupert was oblivious.

      Liked by 3 people

      • You know, I distinctly recall trying to warn him that Angela was after his body (snort!), that he was being used, and that if he continued in his course of action he’d land in prison. He chose to interpret our warnings as “threats”. He was wilfully oblivious, full of his own importance, and now he’s paying for it.

        Liked by 3 people

        • Some folk insist on learning the hard way.I am far from convinced Rupert “silly boy” Quaintance has learned anything at all from his egoistic stupidity.His eventual release from captivity will reveal much one way or the other.

          Liked by 2 people

          • Yeah, Mik. He has still not shown any remorse whatsoever for his actions. I’m suspecting he’ll come out an angry man, full of hatred about his incarceration.

            Liked by 2 people

  7. So I wonder if the email in this post is what Angie was referring to last night in this ‘accidentally on purpose’ admission:

    Liked by 3 people

  8. “I would have a VERY GOOD CASE for saying YOU lured ME on to the front line of this case…You lulled me in to a false sense of trusting you and I did so to an extent I rarely do.”

    An interesting comment from Angie in the light of this recent concession:

    Liked by 2 people

    • Angela would have been handed a leaflet mentioning the 2 Hampstead Children by Mary at the Ben Fellows hearing at Southwark Crown Court on 2nd January, 2015.

      She says she picked up on it in early February 2015 when Sabine released those videos and has mentioned this on a video recording with Rupert a year late,r so to blame Charlotte/Jackie is a load of ole bull as usual from Angela.

      Does Angela ever take responsibilty for her actions?

      Jackie/Charlotte is spot on in that Angela lured Rupert to get physically involved rather that just making a video online.

      I am 99.99% that Angela did this with a view to having a relationship with Rupert but she used the Hampstead Hoax as an excuse.

      Vile woman.

      Liked by 3 people

      • Funnily enough I looked into this recently to find out when Angie’s Hampstead posts began on Facebook and who if anyone had got her involved, as someone had asked me about this.

        I can’t vouch for the Southwark thing but as far as Facebook goes, her first post went up on 5th February 2015, when she shared a related YT video. It’s not clear how she found out about the video but the majority of her early shares re. Hampstead appear to have emanated from Sabine (including her Google Drive docs), though Bronwyn features pretty heavily too (towards the end of the month) and there are also appearances by Tapnewswire, Charlotte, Belinda, Mel Ve, Araya, Aangirfan, Alfred Labremont Webre, Spivey, Brian Kelly, Richie Allen, Vicki von Blackwood, Mumsnet and others.

        It’s also worth noting that Angela was aware of Belinda before the Hampstead stuff broke and had already been sharing her stuff on child abuse.

        Liked by 3 people

          • One of the funniest signs outside Christ Church said ‘Hempstead’ – says more about their dedication to the weed than anything.
            Think it was Justyna carrying it. Last I heard of her she was going to apply to college to be a social worker. 🙂

            Liked by 3 people

          • Oh gawd, the troofers won’t like Justyna being a social worker but then again Angela is an ex-foster carer or so she claims yet she slates Social Services and anything connected to them.

            Liked by 3 people

      • But I have video evidence!

        See! Rabbits dwelling on the heath = heath dwellers = heathen! and they don’t worship Jehovah or Christ, they worship:
        “Lord Frith: The sun-god, and creator of the universe. In the rabbits’ creation story, he grants all the animals their distinguishing features” and
        “El-ahrairah: A rabbit trickster folk hero, who is the protagonist of nearly all of the rabbits’ stories. He represents what every rabbit wants to be: smart, devious, tricky, and devoted to the well-being of his warren. A complex folklore was created around him in both Watership Down and Tales from Watership Down. In Lapine, his name is a contraction of the phrase Elil-Hrair-Rah, meaning “prince with a thousand enemies”.

        Bunnies are servants of Satan and they run the Illuminati. It’s obvious and undeniable.

        Liked by 2 people

    • It so happens my paparazzi pal was around at the time and happened to snap those Witches on Hampstead Heath. There’s something oddly familiar about them.

      Liked by 4 people

  9. “If Rupert on the other hand continues the blame game or vulnerable victim thing and that necessitates discrediting and villifying [sic] me, I will respond accordingly.”

    I think you already did, Angie, during his trial:

    Liked by 3 people

    • Well he wasn’t 1. The deep state CIA operative

      2. He was a foolish freeloader imo but he may have thought the Hampstead Hoax had some legs, but after Lanzarote he didn’t as he has admitted, so he was extremely foolish.

      3. A superb strategist ……Time and verdict will tell.
      I haven’t a clue what she means by that and not sure what she thinks about the verdict??

      Love to see, not, that she thought she was so important that she was needed to attend Southwark crown court for the trial.

      Who would have paid her travel expenses, not her for sure?

      Liked by 3 people

  10. “And I HAVE endured severe targetting [sic] tho [sic] not arrest…”

    Ah, right. Thanks for clearing that up for us, Angie. Now remind us why it is you’ve been unable to step foot in the UK for the last year and a half…?

    Liked by 2 people

    • Lol so Angie reckons that she “endured severe targeting” does she? I’d like to see any evidence that she has to prove this. Is it like the supposed death threats that she said were in Facebook account notes section but when checked there no sign of these threats at all.

      Liked by 2 people

  11. “Stow it”

    Another new expression learnt. This place is a veritable education, I tells yer.

    Thanks, EC 🙂

    Liked by 3 people

  12. Yolande’s sticking it to the Jews again (yawn):

    By the way, I see she has two of Andy Devine’s accounts on her friend list.

    Liked by 2 people

  13. So why is old Charlatan Ward backing off from the hoax she did so much to promote by declaring it a psy op?

    Why is she trying to shift as much blame onto others as possible?

    Does she need to come back to the UK for some reason?

    Liked by 4 people

    • At approx. 3:40, he has something in his mouth that resembles a very immature penis…clearly that episode was another one of the backhanded advertisements for his little boy prostitution service.


  14. Paterson is back off a recent Facebook ban, on one of his profiles.

    His buddy, Field McConnell of Abel Danger, is on with Tracey Beanz, the one Nathan Stolpman says works with Hoaxtead, lol. Bet Paterson is not happy his buddy is working with the enemy!

    Liked by 2 people

    • These people don’t get out much do they? Or meet many peoiple. They think if someone says they worked in a branch of the military it somehow gives them more credence.


    • YES Debs, they are A HOAX. She sounds like Henry Ford.

      From The Skeptic’s Dictionary –

      “”The only statement I care to make about the Protocols is that they fit in with what is going on. They are sixteen years old, and they have fitted the world situation up to this time. They fit it now.” –Henry Ford, 2-17-21, whose newspaper, the Dearborn Independent, cited the Protocols as evidence of an alleged Jewish threat until at least 1927

      “To what extent the whole existence of this people is based on a continuous lie is shown incomparably by the Protocols of the Wise Men of Zion….” –Adolph Hitler, Mein Kampf”

      “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion is a forgery made in Russia for the Okhrana (secret police), which blames the Jews for the country’s ills. It was first privately printed in 1897 and was made public in 1905. It is copied from a nineteenth century novel by Hermann Goedsche (Biarritz, 1868) and claims that a secret Jewish cabal is plotting to take over the world.

      The basic story was composed by Goedsche, a German novelist and anti-Semite who used the pseudonym of Sir John Retcliffe. Goedsche stole the main story from another writer, Maurice Joly, whose Dialogues in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu (1864) involved a Hellish plot aimed at opposing Napoleon III. Goedsche’s original contribution consists mainly of introducing Jews to do the plotting to take over the world.

      The Russians used big chunks of a Russian translation of Goedsche’s novel, published it separately as the Protocols, and claimed they were authentic. Their purpose was political: to strengthen the czar Nicholas II’s position by exposing his opponents as allies with those who were part of a massive conspiracy to take over the world. Thus, the Protocols are a forgery of a plagiarized fiction.

      The Protocols were exposed as a forgery by Lucien Wolf in The Jewish Bogey and the Forged Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion (London: Press Committee of the Jewish Board of Deputies, 1920). In 1921, Philip Graves, a correspondent for the London Times, publicized the forgery. Herman Bernstein in The Truth About “The Protocols of Zion”: A Complete Exposure (1935) also tried and failed to convince the world of the forgery.

      The Protocols were published in 1920 in a Michigan newspaper started by Henry Ford mainly to attack Jews and Communists. Even after they were exposed as a forgery, Ford’s paper continued to cite the document. Adolf Hitler later used the Protocols to help justify his attempt to exterminate Jews during World War II.

      The Protocols hoax continues to fool people and is still cited by certain individuals and groups as the cause of all their woes.”

      Liked by 1 person

    • I have a terrible revelation for poor Mad Moo : if Jesus was God’s son that means God is Jewish. I hope she realises that when she gets to the Pearly Gates the door bitch St Peter will be asking her to quote the entire Protocols of Zion if she wants in.


    • For crying out loud- can’t she get out and work for Meals on Wheels or a Foodbank or knit dollies for the local charity shop or do something bloody useful with her life instead of moaning, moaning, moaning until the cows come home.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Meanwhile, I hear they’re running out of puke buckets over at Arse-Lickers Anonymous…


    • Bad Luck Sir John Paterson: Jesus was a Jewish Communist who really did “threaten” to take over the world by starting a movement and almost has.
      Re: Angela Merkel and Hilary Clinton being Adolf & Eva’s kids, there doesn’t seem much family resemblance. I reckon Eva was having it off with one of Adolf’s bodyguards and he could be the father. Job for John : track down the real father. Means a trip to Argentina and going deep into the jungle. Do it.


  15. Good to know that that spelling bee award hasn’t gone to Malcom’s head…


  16. A few weeks ago Nina Valentine was asking people for money for her vet’s bills (for the cat, not her 🙂 ). Considerable amount of around a thousand quid. Here she is now talking about the new camera she’s ordered. Just sayin’. Not even got the sense to keep her gob shut about this.

    Liked by 1 person

  17. Oh dear, Ogilvy’s drunk again:

    Or to put it another way, there’s no way in a million years someone sane and sober would interpret PT’s comment as a death threat. Not to mention using the word ‘more’ without being able to produce a single scrap of evidence that we have ever made any death threats whatosever (sound familiar, lol?).

    Meanwhile, here are Malky’s death threats to us, to members of the Hampstead community and to RD (who the dumb twat still thinks is Spiny):

    No hypocrisy there, then 🙂


    • To be fair, though, he appears to be levelling the accusation against some site called ‘Hoaxstead’, so I think we’re in the clear.


    • What a freak! Can he not read context of the image with Rupert behind her in the picture, FFS.
      Go hunt some Haggis you creepy twat Uglyoily or whatever your stupid name is.
      This is the Malky wanker who post death threats to women?


      Now go wash the shit out of your hair you pathetic piece of shit.
      Malky, you on on my radar now, lol.


        • I can picture him in green tights, maybe more of a Maid Marian, than a Robin Hood though.


        • That’s a fair point!
          I did think he was too desperate to bother with, to be honest. Plus, nobody reads his blog. Well, only to check up on his threats to women.

          Liked by 1 person

        • Absolutely disgusting! Is this the same guy who was yelling disgusting sexual accusations about dogs to women in the street?
          The guy has sex on the brain, PERVERT.

          Liked by 1 person

          • Yep. It’s all on video, him accosting Sylvia and Maggs in the street and yelling that they have sex with dogs. It was serious sexual harassment. And at one point I recall him raising his fist to them. His luck will run out eventually with all the evidence that we and others have on him.


    • Don’t sweat it, PT. The manky-haired freak is just self-projecting. Christ knows how he arrived at all this, lol:


  18. Rupert – represented the fantasy that you can do whatever you want on the internet, with no real-life consequences for yourself – if you are a clever fellow.

    Rupert – represents the reality that you CAN’T do whatever you want on the internet, with no real-life consequences for yourself – no matter hoe clever you think you are.
    To which I say….gimme dat ding!

    Liked by 1 person

    • He thinks Paratroofer is the man who was arrested for raping women in their sleep.
      No evidence of course, it’s just something he decided to make a post about, the the libelous creep.


  19. Pingback: Hoaxtead mobsters continue war of words: Angela v Yolande | HOAXTEAD RESEARCH

Comments are closed.