Whither Hoaxtead? Re-examining the hoaxers’ end game

The Hoaxtead mobsters have been running around like distraught chickens since the verdict was delivered in Rupert Quaintance trial for harassment two weeks ago. Seriously, we haven’t seen this much excitement since Sabine and Neelu received their respective restraining orders last year.

It’s been fascinating to watch.

Some, such as Belinda and Angela, have tried to defend themselves from the inevitable allegations that they were at least partially to blame for Rupert’s travelling to London to harass the falsely accused families; others, like Kristie Sue Costa and Kane Slater, have resorted to cunning yet futile attempts to create enmity between this blog and certain troofers who happen to have realised that the Hampstead SRA hoax was…well, a hoax. Some, like Neelu and Christine Ann Sands, have attempted to have this blog taken down via spurious DMCA reports. Some, like Deborah Mahmoudieh, have ramped up their production of shrilly demented videos; and still others have tried to back-pedal away from the hoax, claiming they were never really involved and, um, they have something else to do elsewhere, bye!

According to the Hoaxtead mob’s own logic, these frantic attempts to defend themselves, dissemble, attack, and undermine Hoaxtead Research all point to one inevitable conclusion: we’ve touched a nerve (or several), we’ve “driven the cockroaches into the light”, and they’re panicking as they realise that Rupert’s case is a new bellwether, a marker of things to come.

While it’s interesting to watch all this, it brings us back to a question we’ve considered in the past: what is it that these people ultimately seek?

Commenter TN put it well yesterday:

They are completely creepy about children and that to me is deeply suspicious: using them as pawns in their propaganda, monetising and wallowing in endless promotion of disgusting, sick fantasies, focusing direct attention on children – whose privacy by law should be protected but hasn’t been – putting them at risk of greater harm than they’ve already had to endure and on and on it goes. Perhaps obfuscating other child abuse crimes, we don’t really know but it is starting to feel like it.

So why do they continue to pursue this so vigorously? What is the end game? What is the political outcome those at the centre of the planning – so clearly laid out in EC’s article and prior ones – seek? Because, we know, it’s sure as hell not about helping children.

What’s the end game?

The answer to that question varies, according to the Hoaxtead mobster, and the time period, under consideration.

For example, Belinda, who put so much time and energy into bringing together the hoax’s major players, coaching them on strategies that would play effectively to an audience of troofers, and overseeing the broad-based internet marketing campaign, is now playing a defensive game, attempting to avoid the legal consequences which loom ever closer. She was overheard at Rupert’s trial, allowing as how it would be important to see what sorts of evidence might be produced, and how it would be presented to the jury, as she expects that she will be in a similar position to Rupert in a matter of months.

Abe and Ella are a bit of a blank slate at the moment, as they have lost both their blogs and are now more or less incommunicado. With all their sources of funding cut off, and only a few troofers still willing to speak to them, their prospects look bleak indeed. At one point, it seemed that their goal had been to drive RD out of the picture, ruining him in the process; to reclaim Ella’s children and continue using them as small spokespeople for Abe’s sick version of “state-sponsored mind control” and the healing properties of hemp; and to humiliate and damage as many of the families, teachers, and clergy at Christ Church and the school as they possibly could. Though it’s difficult to interpret silence, we would anticipate that currently their goals are a bit more modest: “not starving” probably comes close to the top of their list. “Evading extradition and arrest” is probably up there as well.

Neelu and Christine, meanwhile, seem less concerned with long-term goals, and more concerned with destroying this blog in any way they can. Those of us with long memories might recollect that Neelu tried this exact manoeuvre in August 2016, when she (again) urged her friends to lodge DMCA complaints against us. As you can no doubt tell, that worked like a bloody charm. We see Christine and Neelu less as long-term strategists, more as the “throw their toys out of the pram” types. Their goals: destruction and incoherent rage, complete with stamping of feet and pounding of fists.

Deborah seems to be angling for a second investigation of the hoax, plus all the ganja she can smoke. We feel duty-bound to tell her that no matter how often she reports her perceived injoostices to the NSPCC, the IPPC, the MET, the EU, the UN, or the AA, the police are not going to re-open the Hampstead case. It is over, closed, done with, complete, finito, gone, ended. Debs can shriek until she is blue in the face (and we wish she would, as this would be most interesting to watch so long as we’re warned ahead of time and can wear the appropriate ear protection), but it will all be for naught.

As for Kristie Sue and Kane…well, what they hope to achieve is a bit unclear. They claim to want to end cannibalism and paedophilic Satanic abuse, particularly in Hampstead. Well, we have some excellent news for them. It’s never existed, so…achievement unlocked! Congratulations, you won, it’s over. You can feel free to shut the fuck up now.