Dear Sabine: Put that in your pipe and smoke it

Today’s post is brought to you by the website What Do They Know? We’re posting the conversation in its entirety…we hope you find it as amusing as we do!

13 July, 2017

Dear Metropolitan Police Service (MPS),

In my capacity as McKenzie Friend I have given a voice to many voiceless children and wonder whether any of my complaints ever reached MPS?

As the worst of all cases comprises many Officers from several Police Stations, supporters of Children’s Rights are wondering whether the Police is adequately equipped to investigate organised child abuse to professional standards? Michael Hames published “The Dirty Squad” in 2000 and wrote that the Force was not familiar with the challenges. Has this changed?

This submission to the Children’s Commissioner in 2012 describes the challenges involving Police:
http://www.maranathacommunity.org.uk/pdf.

If MPS is not the right agency to deal with the challenge, then which one would be right?

Should there maybe one that specialises in organised abuse based on faith and belief?

What are the chances of children at risk being properly protected, given bad reports and press?

How many complaints about organised child abuse have you actually received and since when?

Yours faithfully,

Sabine K McNeill

*****

17 July, 2017

Dear Ms McNeill

Freedom of Information Request Reference No: 2017070000512

I write in connection with your request for information which was received by the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) on 13/07/2017.  I note you seek access to the following information:

“In my capacity as McKenzie Friend I have given a voice to many voiceless
children and wonder whether any of my complaints ever reached MPS?

As the worst of all cases comprises many Officers from several Police
Stations, supporters of Children’s Rights are wondering whether the Police
is adequately equipped to investigate organised child abuse to
professional standards? Michael Hames published “The Dirty Squad” in 2000
and wrote that the Force was not familiar with the challenges. Has this
changed?

This submission to the Children’s Commissioner in 2012 describes the
challenges involving Police:
http://www.maranathacommunity.org.uk/pdf.

If MPS is not the right agency to deal with the challenge, then which one
would be right?

Should there maybe one that specialises in organised abuse based on faith
and belief?

What are the chances of children at risk being properly protected, given
bad reports and press?

How many complaints about organised child abuse have you actually received
and since when?”

This is to inform you that the MPS are unable to proceed with your request as we require further information from you.

* Regarding your last question “How many complaints about organised child abuse have you actually received and since when?” – Please provide a timescale. Please also clarify if you would like the
information to refer to calendar years OR financial years OR if you would like to specify other start and end times.

After receiving your reply, your request will then be considered and you will receive a response within the statutory timescale of 20 working days.

However, if the requested additional information has not been received by Monday 14th August 2017, I will assume you no longer wish to proceed with this request and will treat it as withdrawn.

Should you have any further enquiries concerning this matter, please contact us at [email address] quoting the reference number above.

Yours sincerely,

R. Loizou
Support Officer – Freedom of Information Triage Team

*****

17 July, 2017

Dear Metropolitan Police Service (MPS),

THANK YOU for your request of clarification.

Please let me have data for as long a time period as you can provide.

Please choose whatever is more convenient: calendar or financial years.

With many thanks in advance,

Yours faithfully,

Sabine K McNeill

*****

18 July, 2017

Dear Ms McNeill

Freedom of Information Request Reference No: 2017070000512

I write in connection with your request for information which was received by the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) on 13/07/2017.  I note you seek access to the following information:

“In my capacity as McKenzie Friend I have given a voice to many voiceless
children and wonder whether any of my complaints ever reached MPS?

As the worst of all cases comprises many Officers from several Police
Stations, supporters of Children’s Rights are wondering whether the Police
is adequately equipped to investigate organised child abuse to
professional standards? Michael Hames published “The Dirty Squad” in 2000
and wrote that the Force was not familiar with the challenges. Has this
changed?

This submission to the Children’s Commissioner in 2012 describes the
challenges involving Police:
http://www.maranathacommunity.org.uk/pdf.

If MPS is not the right agency to deal with the challenge, then which one
would be right?

Should there maybe one that specialises in organised abuse based on faith
and belief?

What are the chances of children at risk being properly protected, given
bad reports and press?

How many complaints about organised child abuse have you actually received
and since when?”

Clarified on 17/07/2017:

“THANK YOU for your request of clarification.

Please let me have data for as long a time period as you can provide.

Please choose whatever is more convenient: calendar or financial years.”

Your request will now be considered in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (the Act).  You will receive a response within the statutory timescale of 20 working days as defined by the Act.  

If you have any further enquiries concerning this matter, please contact us at [email address] or on the phone at 0207 161 3500, quoting the reference number above. Should your enquiry relate to the logging or allocations process we will be able to assist you directly and where your enquiry relates to other matters (such as the status of the request) we will be able to pass on a message and/or advise you of the relevant contact details.

Yours sincerely

R. Loizou
Support Officer – Freedom of Information Triage Team

*****

13 August, 2017

Dear Metropolitan Police Service (MPS),

The FOI system alerts me to your delay in responding.

Can I please remind you of my questions and request for information?

With many thanks in advance,

Yours faithfully,

Sabine K McNeill

*****

14 August, 2017

Dear Ms McNeill,

Thank you for your e-mail. I am sorry that the MPS has not been able to provide you with a response within the 20 working day timeframe. I can confirm that the person dealing with your request is Mr Lyng.

Mike: I would be grateful if you could please provide Ms McNeill with an update on her request.
Thank you.

Regards,

Kolsuma Sultana| FOI Triage Team |
Strategy & Insight | Strategy & Governance | Met HQ | Metropolitan Police Service

*****

14 August, 2017

Dear Ms McNeill

Freedom of Information Request Reference No: 2017070000512

I write in connection with your request for information which was received by the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) on 13/07/2017.

I am sorry that you have not received a suitable response within the 20 working days stipulated by the Freedom of Information Act 2000.

Whilst I am unable to provide you with a date for a response, I can confirm that the case is still in progress.

I will update you again by Friday 25th August 2017.

Yours sincerely

Mr. Lyng
Information Manager

*****

22 August, 2017

Dear Ms. McNeill

Freedom of Information Request Reference No: 2017070000512

I write in connection with your request for information which was received by the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) on 13/07/2017.  Firstly, may I apologise for the delay to this response. I note you seek access to the following information, which for ease of reference I have numbered:

1 – In my capacity as McKenzie Friend I have given a voice to many voiceless children and wonder whether any of my complaints ever reached MPS?

2 – As the worst of all cases comprises many Officers from several Police Stations, supporters of Children’s Rights are wondering whether the Police is adequately equipped to investigate organised child abuse to professional standards?

3 – Michael Hames published “The Dirty Squad” in 2000 and wrote that the Force was not familiar with the challenges. Has this changed?

This submission to the Children’s Commissioner in 2012 describes the challenges involving Police: http://www.maranathacommunity.org.uk/pdf.

4 – If MPS is not the right agency to deal with the challenge, then which one would be right?

5 – Should there maybe one that specialises in organised abuse based on faith and belief?

6 – What are the chances of children at risk being properly protected, given bad reports and press?

7 -How many complaints about organised child abuse have you actually received and since when?”

Please let me have data for as long a time period as you can provide.

Please choose whatever is more convenient: calendar or financial years.”

DECISION

Q1: The MPS neither confirms nor denies that it holds the information you have requested for this question as the duty in Section 1(1)(a) of the
Freedom of Information Act 2000 does not apply by virtue of the Section 40(5) exemption.  

Q2-6: The MPS is satisfied that you are seeking an opinion for these specific questions, for which there is no requirement for the MPS to create information.

Q7: The MPS can advise that it will not be possible to respond to this question within the cost threshold.  

This response serves as a Refusal Notice under Section 17 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (the Act).  Please see the legal annex for further information on the exemptions applied in respect of your request.

REASONS FOR DECISION

In regards to Question 1: A Freedom of Information Act request is not a private transaction. Both the request itself, and any information disclosed, are considered suitable for open publication. This is because, under Freedom of Information, any information disclosed is released into the wider public domain, effectively to the world and not just to one individual. In most cases Personal Data is exempt from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act as I will explain below.

To confirm or deny whether personal information exists in response to your request could publicly reveal information about an individual or individuals, thereby breaching the right to privacy afforded to persons under the Data Protection Act.

In regards to Questions 2 – 6: Please note that requests made under the Act are for information held by a public authority at the time a request is made. The ICO clarifies that there is no requirement for a public authority to create information or provide opinion in order to respond to a request unless this is already held in documents or other form.

The MPS is satisfied that you are seeking an opinion to these questions. Further reference to the ICO advice can be found by way of this link:  https://ico.org.uk/for-the-public/offici…

In regards to Question 7: As this information is not recorded in the format you have requested we have considered how to locate this information.

Initial enquiries were made within the Performance and Assurance Unit (PAU), who prepare statistical information for the MPS, to determine how we would extract the information relevant to your criteria.

Our Crime Reporting Information System (CRIS) allows the individual creating the crime report to select from a number of branch flags. The branch flag that best suits your request is ES – Child Sexual Exploitation. Unfortunately, this particular flag was only introduced on CRIS from April 2013 and does not indicate if ‘organised’ as you have requested.

Therefore, to determine if any records (containing the branch flag of ES) is relevant to your request, would require a member of police staff to manually read thousands of CRIS reports to determine if they were relevant to your request.

All records would need to be read as it would not be known whether or not the report contained any pertinent information to determine if the offence was ‘organised’. This process would clearly exceed the appropriate threshold of 18 hours in order to determine if held, locate and extract.

We therefore estimate that the cost of complying with this request would exceed the appropriate limit. The appropriate limit has been specified in regulations and for agencies outside central Government; this is set at £450.00.  This represents the estimated cost of one person spending 18 hours [at a rate of £25 per hour] in determining whether the MPS holds the information, and locating, retrieving and extracting the information.

Section 16 Advice and Assistance

I would like to provide you with some advice and assistance as to how you may narrow your request so that it does not exceed the appropriate limit.

In regards to Question 7 – You may wish to narrow your request for the number of CRIS reports containing the Branch code of ES (Child Sexual Exploitation) since its introduction in April 2013, broken down by financial year (April 2013 to July 2017).

Please note that any narrowed request will be treated as a new request for consideration under the Act and may be subject to exemptions. This can be made by emailing [email address]

Yours sincerely

Mr. Lyng
Information Manager

LEGAL ANNEX

Section 17(1) (5) of the Act provides:

(1)  A public authority which, in relation to any request for information, is to any extent relying on a claim that any provision of Part II relating to the duty to confirm or deny is relevant to the request or on a claim that information is exempt information must, within the time for complying with section 1(1), give the applicant a notice which-
(a) states that fact,
(b) specifies the exemption in question, and
(c) states (if that would not otherwise be apparent) why the exemption applies.

(5) A public authority which, in relation to any request for information, is relying on a claim that section 12 or 14 applies must, within the time for complying with section 1(1), give the applicant a notice stating that fact.

Section 12(1) of the Act provides:

(1) Section 1 does not oblige a public authority to comply with a request for information if the authority estimates that the cost of complying with the request would exceed the appropriate limit.

Section 16 of the Act provides:

(1) It shall be the duty of a public authority to provide advice and assistance, so far as it would be reasonable to expect the authority to do so, to persons who propose to make, or have made, requests for information to it.

(2) Any public authority which, in relation to the provision of advice or assistance in any case, conforms with the code of practice under section 45 is to be taken to comply with the duty imposed by subsection (1) in relation to that case.

Section 40(5) of the Act provides:

(5)  The duty to confirm or deny-
(a) does not arise in relation to information which is (or if it were held by the public authority would be) exempt information by virtue of subsection (1), and
(b) does not arise in relation to other information if or to the extent that either-
(i) the giving to a member of the public of the confirmation or denial that would have to be given to comply with section 1(1)(a) would (apart from this Act) contravene any of the data protection principles or section 10 of the [1998 c. 29.] Data Protection Act 1998 or would do so if the exemptions in section 33A (1) of that Act were disregarded, or (ii) by virtue of any provision of Part IV of the [1998 c. 29.] Data Protection Act 1998 the information is exempt from section 7(1) (a) of that Act (data subject’s right to be informed whether personal data being processed).

Advertisements

273 thoughts on “Dear Sabine: Put that in your pipe and smoke it

    • It’s hilarious when fantasists run into a brick wall of reality 🙂
      Just calling yourself “a journalist”, doesn’t make you one. Just calling yourself “an investigator”, doesn’t make you one. And no one else is required to accept your delusional picture of yourself.

      Like

  1. Sabine said: “3 – Michael Hames published “The Dirty Squad” in 2000 and wrote that the Force was not familiar with the challenges. Has this changed”?

    Bullshit! I have my copy right here, you lying skank. Here is some of what Hames did say:

    “Keith Driver’s report contained details of a further thirty-seven cases…In Keith’s summing-up on the research project, he sais that no evidence was found in any of the cases to support the more extreme allegations, such as human sacrifice, torture, or the eating of human flesh and drinking of blood”…

    Liked by 3 people

    • She’s asking police to investigate something and provide ‘opinion’ because someone published a book in 2000?.
      I still have my treasured Famous Five book from the 1960s and in it the crew go to an island where smugglers are suspected of using secret tunnels. I’m writing to the MPS to ask them how many cases are there of smugglers using secret tunnels on islands and whether they involved child trafficking and if the smugglers were in fact, Satanists.

      Liked by 3 people

      • Feel free to refer your concerns to the authorities Sam, but you’ll be banging your head against the wall. I myself have written repeatedly to MI6 to warn them that there’s an dodgy bald bloke with a cat who runs an evil criminal organisation from a hollowed out volcano in the Sea of Japan but will they fucking listen? We’re going to Hell in a bloody handcart.

        Liked by 1 person

  2. “Dear Metropolitan Police Service (MPS)”

    LOL! These people really could do with a lesson or two in the art of letter-writing, couldn’t they. I think we should put Mad Moo down too. For lessons I mean.

    Liked by 2 people

    • I wish they’d stop wasting Police and other Authorities time and tax payers cash.

      If she had to pay £10 a time for her request and nonsense that’d soon put a stop to it.

      Liked by 3 people

  3. Hehe, that meme at the end of EC’s post says in a mere four words what it took the police 2,000+ words to say. EC, you’re wasted at MI5 and I wonder whether you’ve considered a transfer to the MPS. It looks like they would benefit greatly from your succinctitude, particularly in light of the increasing volume of waffly, ill-informed requests/rants/abuse they receive from the likes of Sabine, Neelu, Mad Moo etc.

    And if ‘succinctitude’ isn’t a word, it bleedin’ well should be 😀

    Screenshot_416

    Liked by 3 people

    • CP – Not wishing to take anything away from that nice Mr. Coyote but in that meme he is merely quoting the pussycat depicted, which my sources at MI6 inform me is the same pussycat you see perched in the background in many a Stolpman vid. And I’m just throwing this out there but perhaps she would be of more use staying where she is and coaching Mr. Stolpman in the fine art of less-is-more, so that the insufferable bore can stop putting people into comas with his interminable waffle.

      Like

    • I just don’t understand Sabine’s interest in Children, any Children, I really don’t.

      If I was her I’d be more worried about the number of times her name was mentioned last week at Southwark Crown Cout.

      I wonder if Belinda has told her?

      Liked by 1 person

    • She can’t help herself can she Sabine? Breaching court orders & injunctions seem to be her forte.

      Everything that happens in Sabine’s life seems to be the fault of Hoaxtead even the dreadful bombing of Dresden. Perhaps she should ask the MPS to investigate why Britain had the temerity to attack Germany just because the Nazis wanted to conquer half the world and exterminate certain races of people.

      # what restrictions are there on reporting a current case? There is only a restriction on reporting witnesses names and for bloody good reason so ghouls like McNeill can’t encourage and perpetuate attacks upon them as she has in the past. What a contemptible woman she is.

      The arrogance and gall of Mad Moo who actually believes she alone is fighting child abuse by making ranting videos on Youtube.

      Liked by 4 people

    • I thought Rof Mohammed was an ex-social worker?

      Might be a different guy, but if it is the same person why is Deborah even entertaining him as surely he is “the enemy”?

      Liked by 1 person

    • Finally she gets something right: no-one believes her.
      Did it ever enter her head that Youtube is not the place to fight anything?
      Has it ever entered Moo’s head that she could help children in a dozen practical ways like working for charities that aid the 100,000s of British children living below the poverty line?.
      No thought not. Why do something practical when you can sit at home, get social security payments and rent assistance and fight the world via your computer.
      What a perpetually lazy Moaning Minnie she is..it’s all ME ME ME.

      Liked by 2 people

    • “It negates your whole existence, your validity as a credible intelligence and denies your right to be received, accepted, to connect with interest, empathy, understanding or help”

      Say WHAAA???

      Mad moo and empathy or understanding???
      And yes we DO negate your ‘validity as a credible intelligence’
      intelligence and mad moo are concepts you normally dont think of as going together…..
      (as for being credible…. well……….)

      Liked by 2 people

      • I hope those are LAWFUL negations, Steve. Otherwise there will be fully satisfied arrest criteria to come round and nick your arse.

        Like

    • I’m not laughing at you David, I think you’re boring and wasting a lot of your time doing all these video rants.

      Could I suggest you take your dogs for a few walks each day, would probably calm them down and you too.

      I’m just not interested, another bore and attention seeker you are.

      Liked by 3 people

      • “Blah blah Hoaxtead blah blah Doug Mesner blah blah paedophile protection squad blah blah Justin Sanity blah blah just trying to get my dad investigated blah blah they’re blasting me so frickin’ hard today blah blah I’ve lost 200 pounds since Tuesday blah blah I’m going bald and I’m only 50 blah blah they went before Congress in 1872 and admitted these weapons exist blah blah I know you are but what am I…”

        Repeat ad infinitum. Zzzzzzzz

        Liked by 3 people

        • What Ethel of the Family Aardvark said above.
          And I don’t find Shurter remotely funny except in an occasional wicked indulgence in mocking the afflicted and you are afflicted Dave in so many ways.

          Call me crazy, call me old fashion, call me Doris but I find it hard to find humour in a man who claims he murdered someone. set them on fire and sat by while his Dad allegedly bricked up dead kiddies in his living room wall.

          Liked by 2 people

          • Thing is he didn’t really murder anyone. He’s a sick twisted fantasist who wishes he had killed lots of children and raped their corpses and set fire to a policeman. And it’s all stuff he’d forgotten about until it all came back to him in a dream a few years ago! LOL

            To me, that’s all about as believable as his claims that Donald Trump is targeting him with remote microwaves to shut him up, that his smoke alarms are cameras in disguise and that the rocks in his garden are trying to kill him.

            Mind you, I do worry about what he might do in the future. He clearly has murderous and violently sexual urges and he has previously threatened to kill his neighbour’s children (hence the restraining order), prayed for various people, including us and our children, to die in agony, and dropped hints about going on a shooting spree (which he later frantically denied when he realised the seriousness of what he’d said). And worryingly, he does live in a country which stupidly allows people to own guns.

            Liked by 1 person

          • Doris’s frigging perforated ear-drum is healing but Christ it takes a long time. Have been having acupuncture for the Tinnitus that accompanied it and it’s a great help.
            Mine was caused by an infection- the very notion a grown man would belt a kid and cause such damage…grrrr.

            Liked by 4 people

    • The Aztec religion did not carve the world up into good and bad, thus shit was as important to the motions of the world as lamas, because life comes out of shit, then returns to shit. However, shit had its place in the world, which was disordered chaos, and thus it needed to be removed out of harms way. Aztec people were obsessed with order and being clean, they employed street cleaners in their cities. Order was the goal, and even though shit was unwanted by the so-called gods, it was useful to the Aztecs as shit is useful to a fly. The principle works for any Satan Hunter, they live off shit, they produce a lot of shit, they drown in shit, however, unlike the Aztecs, the Satan Hunter never removes the shit from their lives, instead the shit destroys them. Put this in your pipes and smoke it, its good shit.

      Liked by 2 people

  4. Sabine said as above blog post:
    “If MPS is not the right agency to deal with the challenge, then which one would be right?
    Should there maybe one that specialises in organised abuse based on faith and belief?”

    What Sabine McNeill would like to see happen is a Witchfinder Police, and the only “faith and belief” she has in mind as a target of the Witchfinder Police are Satanists (i.e. not Christians, Islam or Jedi).

    “…organised abuse based on faith and belief” could define what McNeill and other Satan Hunter are doing, abusing children and their families based upon faith and belief they are involved in Satanism and fictional criminal activities.

    Liked by 1 person

          • BARGAIN: Only $19.99 out of ebay,a must for Angies useful idiots or anyone wishing to ruin any chance of a career in journalism which they never had anyway.
            (or 2 for $49.99 special offer).

            Liked by 1 person

          • I wonder if UKBA will actually take heed of the multiple concerns raised by British Citizens from every corner of the nation this time, and keep this stupid social terrorist out of the country?

            Like

          • I think it would depend on the true purpose of his visit. He has every right to be here as a tourist, but if his goal is to “investigate the Satanists” or some such, then yes, I’d want to let the authorities know.

            Liked by 1 person

          • I hope they give him a visa and then arrest him at the airport for publishing ID’s of abused children and breaking a court judgement and then let him stew for a year waiting for his trial. Don’t these idiots ever learn?

            Liked by 2 people

          • When you routinely get grilled like a kipper at customs for simply having dark skin a beard and a ‘foreign’ name (despite being born, bred and coming from a family that’s been here for over 150 years), it’s really quite difficult to gather any sort of ‘tolerance’ for preppy pasty-faced septics who have actually involved themselves in social terrorism, and about who actual legitimate concerns have been raised, being allowed to just breeze through without a word.

            Liked by 2 people

          • …Yes DotB, a kipper is a fish; specifically a smoked haddock, normally cooked by grilling. Another expression we use over here is “done up like a kipper”, traditionally they come tied up in pairs and are smoked by being humg over a pole.

            – Last time I visited the states (and it will be the last fucking time, we paid good money to be treated like shit) for a family holiday I, my wife and two then very little kids, were six hours being ‘processed’. I can’t remember the last time I walked straight through UK customs; to the point where the Mrs just won’t hear of a holiday abroad – it’s too distressing for the little ones.

            Liked by 2 people

          • It’s not just your country DotB, it’s my own. It was my great-great grandfather than brought the family here in the 1870s as part of the house staff of a colonial mission family coming ‘home’. I was brought up Episcopal and until I was 22 had never been further East than Great Yarmouth! – I can’t walk straight back into my own country but some bloody foreigner who’s stated intent is to cause mayhem can! – Summat not right there!

            Liked by 2 people

          • And sild are baby herrings, available in most supermarkets alongside the sardines and pilchards, and I can thoroughly recommend them.

            But do please leave some for us porpoises and our dolphin comrades. Yum yum 🙂

            Liked by 1 person

  5. “The MPS can advise that it will not be possible to respond to this question within the cost threshold.”

    Of course they do… And it was bloody-obvious that they would respond in that way to Sabine’s idiotically-nebulous requests.

    Cost threshold (and other factors than influence FOI responses) are something that competent, serious researchers, who really do want to drill down to answers, are well aware of. i.e. If you do really plan to hold a government department’s ‘feet to the fire’ you work in such a way as to pin them down so they can’t just wriggle out of it…

    Of course, if you’re not really serious about drilling into these things, and instead just looking to blow scandalous smoke, you make stupid, ‘designed to fail’ approaches like this then start wailing about ‘cover ups’… In reality, this plays straight into the ‘bent as a four-pound note’ element within these services!

    Liked by 3 people

    • they flat out told her exactly what to do to narrow the search so that they could feasibly comply. she could just as easily break it down into pieces and do them one by one, or have her followers request different searches, if it’s that big of a deal. at the least, she could narrow it down and be happy to have gotten Some information.
      but no, these people have to make everything complicated and unreasonable so they can bitch about being victims

      Liked by 2 people

      • That’s exactly it, yes. There are quite a few other examples of conspiracy hoaxers doing exactly this sort of thing. Another technique you see often is that they start a letter-writing campaign against someone like like the Queen or Prime minister about things they know full well these people are constitutionally barred from responding to. Then, when they’re either ignored or referred to the right department, they start banging on about how Lizzy’s a shape shifting reptile and Theresa May’s marinading tandoori toddler.

        Liked by 3 people

  6. As we’re in piscatorial mode I thought I’d post this little ditty which pretty much sums up my feelings about the wider hoaxtard community.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Ther is lawful suspicion that this woman is covering up for the grooming gangs in The UK by promoting hoaxes and deflecting attention away from these paedophiles by making it all seem like a big conspiracy by the so called elites, government and authorities.
      That would lawfully make said woman a protector of nonces.
      It does make you wonder if she is connected to these groups like Bellender is connected to convicted paedophiles.

      Liked by 1 person

    • It’s bizarre to hear Shurter – a man who claims to have murdered several children and a police officer, has two restraining orders against him, frequently slanders and threatens innocent people and is calling for criminals to illegally hack people’s information so that they can be physcally attacked – whining about people who have no respect for the law. And when I say ‘funny’,

      Liked by 2 people

    • 10:55 – “I have no criminal background. I have no criminal record whatsoever.”

      Says the dude who has restraining orders, court orders and police cautions coming out of his arse, not to mention several confessions of murder, rape, arson, violence and intimidation.

      Liked by 2 people

    • “we need support, we need protection”
      then why the FUCK do you push away and lash out at those who offer it to you.
      you will see the change you want to see when you stop sabotaging yourself
      if you don’t like hoaxtead, don’t seek it out, it’s that simple

      Liked by 2 people

      • they dont. he should feed them earlier next time, and not during the video, because that’s the second time in a row they’ve been making noises like that and if it keeps up im not going to believe it anymore that they’re just fighting over food. we haven’t heard them doing that before

        Liked by 2 people

          • A responsible dog owner feeds dogs separately so they don’t have the chance to fight over food. Same with toys. When I look after my friends dogs, I make sure all the toys are put out of the way, and they are fed in separate rooms. There is no excuse really.

            Liked by 2 people

    • I’ve often wondered… should we (GCHQ/Mi5/MFI/BBC1) nor be offering political asylum? – There’s a nice gaff on Rockall going free since the last tenant done a moonlight.

      Liked by 1 person

    • You know me, guys – I’m not one to pick on spelling and grammar. (Stop giggling, Jake Blake.) However, in light of Shurter’s recent whine about about an alleged spelling error from a commenter on this blog, it would be remiss of me not to point out that the word ‘were’ does not have an ‘h’ in it.

      Liked by 2 people

    • Funny how these fucktards who couldn’t defend themselves against a pigeon with bad intentions, manage to somehow survive these attempts on their lives supposedly made by highly trained members of the CIA and FBI. Shades of Ted Gunderson syndrome.
      Look if they wanted you to be dead, you bloody well would be you lying sacks of shit.

      Liked by 3 people

      • Yeah, our current hit squad is failing to hit its targets – pun intended – and a performance review is imminent. You just can’t get the staff these days.

        Liked by 1 person

        • because it would be soooo much more simple to just prevent them from being able to talk to anyone in the first place, or their cars could be hacked to cause accidents, or their cable/internet lines cut, or “killed in a burglery”, etc etc… but no, everyone magically gets away, never once seeing the people that break into their houses and shit

          Liked by 1 person

          • Dave does not require external agency to interfere with his functionalities.He has simultaneously redefined the science of systematic downfall and the art of self sabatage whilst taking credibilty to previously unsurpassed depths.

            Paranoia and sheer inepitude alone must have saved $$$ from hard stretched intelligence resource budgets over the years.Along with a life served at very cutting edge of complete bollox he should now be afforded the opportunity to bob about like a turd somewhere far out in the sea of infinite futility (if it would take him).

            Liked by 1 person

        • Boy who cried Wolf too many times. If I started making predictions and was wrong time and time again, year after year, people would call be a disinformation agent, a liar and not listen to a word of advice I gave.
          So Dave, you are actually doing everyone a favour in repeatedly discrediting yourself.
          Not to mention the FACT that all these memories came from DREAMS you had, DREAMS.
          What sort of pervert has dreams about murdering and raping children? Dave Sharter, that’s who.
          A man who admits to having seen his brothers stash of illegal Child abuse images, and well as being a self confessed cannibal and murderer. ALL FROM DREAMS HE HAD.

          “I was born into a family who was in a group in Omaha, Nebraska. They were Luciferians” – David Shurter (3mins 13)

          “Luciferians as a whole, are all paedophiles, and all kill kids” – David Shurter (3mins 50)

          Ignore the stupid title.

          Liked by 1 person

      • way to protect her location, david…
        *bangs head against desk in exasperation*

        and do i happen to remember that he once posted one of her emails, therefore letting the world know her email address and leaving her vulnerable to attacks…
        *harder banging*

        Liked by 1 person

      • LMAO, just like the many, many, many so called “Targeted Individuals” that put their name, address, links to every social media account they have, their face, record and name the area they live in. They are practically begging people to stalk them to give their lives some meaning and get some attention.
        I won’t link to any of their videos, but this is the sort of advice their so called followers and friends give them, instead of telling them to see a mental health professional.
        More like “Original Asshole”.

        Liked by 2 people

        • and then when ya fucking point it out to them, you’re a fucking asshole and horrible person arentcha, cause of course you have to be a bad person to realize that people can use such information against you

          i started choking at the first line, what is this person smoking to come up with this shit

          Liked by 1 person

          • I did point out to a person in the comments section of one of their videos that what they were experiencing is not gangstalking or being targeted, just because a friend came over and brought a freind of theirs with them that happened to mention eating a banana doesn’t mean they were spying on you earlier when you had eaten a banana, and mentioned seeking some form of help from a professional.
            They didn’t respond, but a guy did telling me to “go kill myself”.
            So I looked at that persons YouTube account and sure enough they had a large following in the T.I. community, claimed they were a victim of gang stalking then had every single piece of personal information you could think of about themselves on there main page. They were also selling many products to other targeted individuals, so I was effectively messing with their money and clients by offering advice.
            They also had the usual GoFundMe Accounts including one where they wanted people to buy them a house.

            It’s a business for these creeps preying on those with mental illnesses. Promote the problem, sell the solution.

            Liked by 3 people

  7. And today’s blatant ethnic stereotype is brought to you by a Miss M. of Sheffield…

    Oh and pssst: speaking with a forked tongue means he DID lie, Debs. D’oh!

    Liked by 1 person

  8. but no, we here at hoaxtead just have tea parties and discuss how to once again fail at killing these people shutting these people up, and we do it completely out in the open on a public blog because we want the whole fucking world to not have any idea whatsoever what we’re up to.

    this is the logic these people use, im losing my fucking shit guys

    Like

      • They do play on our emotions, and it’s important to take some time away from the computer and not let them get to us. It’s depressing to think that people can really be that idiotic, but we have to remember that we’re not out to save the whole world. And even if we were, if we didn’t look after ourselves and take mental health breaks from time to time, we wouldn’t be very good at it.

        I know you feel passionately about all this, and that’s great, but believe me, you can’t immerse yourself in it 24/7 and stay mentally healthy. It’s depressing and anxiety-provoking, and breaks are essential. Even a quick walk around the block, or half an hour playing with a dog or cat, or a trip to my nearest coffee shop to chill out a bit…it’s how I stay sane and focussed.

        Liked by 3 people

  9. Poor Yannis is getting hot and bothered when I observed there exists a gospel that says Jesus as a child was arrogant and also killed two children. He demanded the text, and I obliged and sent it to him.

    http://gnosis.org/library/inftoma.htm

    The gospel is called the Infancy Gospel of Thomas written 2nd century.

    For obvious reasons this gospel never made it into the Bible when the committees of old men met at their synods between 392 and 426 to decide what would go in and what would be left out of what would become the New Testament of the Bible.

    Liked by 1 person

  10. EC, can we have a birthday party on Tuesday for Mad Moo? With some real wobbly jelly and ice cream and Barchon and Mik organising the entertainment? DotB and Sir Henry can be in charge of door security.

    Liked by 2 people

  11. heh…shall i show them, david… shall i show them the things you, a man in his 50s who claims to care about abused kids, said to me, a girl in her 20s who deals with abuse and depression? shall i show them?

    Like

    • don’t fucking fuck with me, i have every right to be angry with you and i’ve never threatened you or hurt you though i very easily could have. at the worst, i’ve vented but even then i kept it well within the lines of decency, even then i fucking defended you and made sure people didn’t go too far and said things to give you the benefit of a doubt and remind them you’re human. don’t Fucking act like im some horrible asshole

      Like

  12. and calling my attempts to recouncil with you “an attack” simply because i wouldnt let things lie at “i’m some horrible person for trying to protect you and then continuing to email you in support of you and to try to gain your forgiveness… it was not an attack, though i should never have bothered with you.
    a kid could actually be ritually abused and go to you as a mentor, and even them, i bet you would kick to the curb and attack if they said or did anything you disagreed with

    Like

  13. hahaha, and i fucking emailed you the means to prevent me from emailing you again today, even though i have issues with how you left things. i gave you the means to be rid of me (not that i couldn’t get around it but fuck it, i’m giving up on you) and if you had put in the tiniest bit of effort and if you weren’t obsessed with the attention you get from hoaxtead you would never have had to hear from me again. wouldnt that make you happy? all you would have had to do was fuck off from hoaxtead but it’s obvious you love this shit because you can’t stay away from it

    Like

  14. DotB… Don’t let this grotesque little excuse for a man torment you. this is the way they work; trying to deflect from their own failings by pushing them onto others. His bait is stale, don’t rise to it. – We all know exactly what Shurter is – nobody. Just a small rodent to play with to pass the time.

    Liked by 2 people

Comments are closed.