News flash: Debs Mahmoudieh doesn’t like it when the shoe is on the other foot.
In this video, released yesterday, she is in fine fettle, frothing at the mouth and building to shrieking crescendos over the fact that someone named “Yannis” made a disparaging comment to her on YouTube:
Apparently “Yannis'” comment included allegations that Deborah Mahmoudieh is a child abuser whose slanderous campaign against the innocent people of Hampstead will not be tolerated, it’s only a matter of time before she’s arrested and thrown in jail where she belongs, and so forth.
Deborah’s response was to accuse this blog of “gangstalking”—apparently she’s been reading up on the latest troofer buzzwords now. Next thing we know she’ll be referring to herself as a “targetted individual”, we suppose.
Without the slightest trace of irony, she launched into this diatribe:
Now, I have not been doing any research on the suspects involved in the Hampstead case. I have never accused any of them outright of being guilty.
I have said there is lawful suspicion and they are lawfully suspect according to the lawful evidence which this country’s authorities, police, and every single child charity in Britain, including the Children’s Commission, all appear to be powerless to act on the fully satisfied arrest criteria involving a child sexual abuse ring making child pornography, baby trafficking, murdering trafficked babies, right, we’re talking about an evidence fully satisfied arrest criteria police crime report that was ignored, and I stood up for justice and I am representing the trafficked babies in this case, who have nobody!
We don’t have names, they have no biological relatives in this country, and it appears not even the child trafficking charities are interested in questioning asking questions why the police did not investigate an evidence crime report involving trafficked babies. and we know from the UN child protection report and multiple countless other evidences that thousands of babies and children are being trafficked into Britain every year and hundreds of those babies and children are being ritually slaughtered in pseudo so-called religious ceremonies. Those are the facts.
So me, I stick with facts, okay, I don’t stick with supposition which is what the British authorities presently suppose, that the children’s crime report was false.
Yep. She said all that.
We’re still trying to work out what she meant by “an evidence fully satisfied arrest criteria police crime report”, but the general idea is pretty clear: she didn’t call anyone a baby-murdering, child-raping paedophile…but the people of Hampstead are baby-murdering, child-raping paedophiles.
The fact that an investigation was conducted, that the people she considers “lawful suspects” were completely vindicated, and that the evidence clearly pointed to the fact that the whole thing was a very cruel hoax, seems to have floated right over Deb’s head.
Bulletin: Zionists are actually Lucy Farians! You heard it here first.
She then goes into an extended rant about how she’s not an anti-Semite—an assertion which she proves by stating that Zionists aren’t really Jews, and that six million Jews were not murdered during the Holocaust. She capped all of this with the claim that Zionists are in fact “Lucy Farians”. And “when it comes to a religion such as Lucy Farianism, well that isn’t a religion is it? let’s face it, the whole thing is a crime”.
Erm…sure, Debs, whatever you say. We don’t know who Lucy Farian is, or why you hate her so, but we’re not about to argue the point. We don’t argue with brick walls, either. Just saying.
What slanderous hate campaign was that again?
As for “Yannis'” allegation that Debs has engaged in a slanderous hate campaign, here’s her response:
So…’slanderous hate campaign against the innocent men, women, and children of Hampstead’—what slanderous hate campaign? You show me a slanderous hate campaign.
Then, as if to answer her own question, she offers us a fine example of a slanderous hate campaign:
I do expect that when we are told that police officers from 16 London police stations, CAFCASS offices, teachers, clergy, lawyers, local business people, are all involved, 172 names, are all involved in baby-trafficking, and drugs, and child pornography, and child prostitution, and murdering, and satanic rituals, then yes, we do want to be reassured that no, this isn’t happening. We’ve been and investigated it thoroughly. You know, there’s no evidence. [Erm…they tried reassuring you lot. Didn’t work worth shit. —Ed.]
When chi have described their abusers—KNOWN, NAMED ABUSERS…teachers at the local school, when children describe their teachers’ genitals…
…and so on, apparently ad infinitum.
So. Let’s get this straight. When Debs calls the innocent people of Hampstead baby murders, child rapists, cannibals, and Lucy Farians, that’s not a targetted hate campaign.
When some random commenter on YouTube says that Debs abuses children and has participated in a hate campaign, that’s a targetted hate campaign.
Oh, and she’s going to tell the police all about it, you just see if she doesn’t. She even has a letter from her GP saying this has had a bad effect on her mental health. But her mental health is just fine, thank you very much. Just because she happens to have the odd supernatural experience which COULD HAPPEN TO ANYBODY, HOW WOULD YOU LIKE IT, EH?
We think she’s barking…up the wrong tree, that is.
You see, we’re not the ones calling Debs a child abuser—it’s that bloody Lucy Farian again. But don’t worry, Debs. If we see her, we’ll tell her you’re looking for her.