Belinda’s flip-flops: What’s she really trying to say?

For months we heard nothing at all from Belinda, the eminence grise behind the Hampstead SRA hoax. Unlike other Hoaxtead mobsters, Belinda seems keenly aware that sometimes discretion is the better part of…well, not valour exactly. Perhaps “discretion is the better part of staying out of prison”? So she’s kept well out of the glare of public scrutiny for several months; she’s removed many of her blog posts from the internet, perhaps understanding that several of them contained information which could incriminate her in a court of law, should she be charged following her arrest last spring.

But last week we reported that Belinda had become embroiled in a brouhaha on Facebook, during which she had seemingly repudiated her previous defamatory statements about the parents, teachers, clergy, and business-people of Hampstead.

Now it seems she’s done another 180-degree turn. Or at least she’s tried to make it look as though she has:

Day before yesterday and going on yesterday evening a guy who’s just become a Friend whom I’ll call X for the moment began messaging me, complaining he’d been being harassed by certain types whom he couldn’t identify, not even their gender or where they lived! Of course, I instantly recognised them as the types who lurk behind weird avatars I’ve referred to in my blogs and postings over the years as the “shadow people”).

X had this very day embarked on legal action against these shadowy types, he told me! how do you embark on legal action against a faceless, genderless, ageless, address-less avatar?? I did instantly wonder. But I became really suspicious when X started to address me personally, referring to me as “a well-educated lady” “with an interest in Japanese art and philosophy” so I finally didn’t continue the dialogue.

Here is what I momentarily typed out but didn’t in the end send: “I’m not quite sure what you are saying to me (X) and am now on alert. As I continue to remind everyone, this whole issue is not and should not ever be about me nor any of the individuals who have taken any kind of stance regarding a certain case but about THE CAUSE itself which is the proper protection of children in our society and world, from the very tiniest babies up to 17–18 year-olds and the failure of the police to investigate allegations of severe crime against these babies, children and young people. Thus the worst and most horrible crimes continue to go on unchecked in our modern world just as they have done since ancient times, acting like “a psychic poison on the soul” of each new generation, to quote Carl Jung. If you are not 100% with me in battling those who abuse children then you are against me and there is nothing more to be said between us! But if YOU have ‘crossed the floor’ on this issue (X) and wish to help from now on defend small children and tiny babies alongside me and risk your own life and safety in doing so, THEN we can continue to dialogue.

(‘Crossed the floor’ refers to the title of an article put up 3 days ago on the Shadow People’s current site called Hoaxtead Research in which I am portrayed as a cornered rat, the police having pounced on me so now I am frightened, etc. —here’s the link, with thanks to X! I LOVE THIS FIGHT, BRING IT ALL ON!

This was followed by a link to our recent article, “Has Belinda crossed the floor on Hoaxtead?”

Well then! On behalf of the Shadow People, we’d like to express our gratitude to Belinda for the extra page views she sent our way.

Interestingly, we note that she hasn’t really repudiated her repudiation, but has referred to the overall “CAUSE”, a rather billowy and undefined thing involving “proper protection” of children.

We take this to mean “proper protection” in the sense of the “protection” she and Sabine tried to offer poor Hollie Greig or the Musa children…this is the kind of protection one expects from dodgy-looking persons who promise to shield you from harm for the price of a down payment and 12 easy monthly installments, renewable yearly.

Hoaxtead: Does she or doesn’t she?

So in one late-night Facebook post Belinda states that “there’s been a horrible mistake and all the people in the area accused have been wrongly accused by implication”…and three days later, she’s nattering on about mysterious new “friends” who seem to know just a little too much about her, and how it’s not about specific cases, but about “THE CAUSE”. (Not to mention the “Shadow People”.)

Slippery old trout that she is, Belinda has managed to make repudiating noises without actually disclaiming her earlier statements. This leaves us with the same impression we had when we read her first comment last week: she is well aware that she’s under police investigation. Having taken down almost all her incriminating blog posts on the matter, she is now attempting to create a new trail of breadcrumbs which will lead anyone investigating her activities to the conclusion that she’s a sane, reasonable person who was misled by that nasty Abraham Christie but has now seen the error of her ways. These days, all she wants to do is campaign for the most vulnerable in our society, the tiny babies who cannot defend themselves. And who could possibly object to that?

Belinda is blissfully unaware, then, of the rather large stash of archived blog posts and videos which we’ve saved over the past couple of years. But that’s fine with us. We’ll be very interested to watch her dig her way out of the hole in which she now finds herself.