Amusing as it is to know that the majority of “new intel” spouted by Angela Power-Disney is actually
stolen nicked lifted directly from this blog, we do think it would be nice if she could at least acknowledge that we’re the ones doing the heavy lifting here.
Take, for example, Angie’s latest blag-fest on Facebook:
I’ll just tell you who Finnbarr is…and um, I’m going to try to make contact…now I don’t want to drop him in it, but at the same time I think he kind of owes the children an explanation. So his full name is…hmm…here we go…he’s got a website called Londonbagpiper.com, and I wish no harm to your online, you know, advertising for your means of making a living, you know…but his name is Finnbarr Hagan, H-a-g-a-n.
Erm…yes, we know. We know because one of our sharp-eyed readers saw him in the comments section on YouTube and recognised his voice, we matched the image we had to Mr Hagan’s photos online, and did the legwork to find out who he is, who he might have been working for, and what he was doing interviewing RD’s children about their alleged sexual abuse.
You’re welcome, Angela.
And in our bitter irony category…
The first video that Echo Truths made about Hampstead I enjoyed. I just thought these are three women doing some research and giving their honest opinion, without undue reverence towards Ella or Abraham. They let RD off the hook very lightly I thought. And when I got to the second, third, and fourth videos I got extremely uncomfortable because it seemed that Echo Truths was cosying up to Hoaxtead, being flattered that they wrote a nice article about her video….
So let’s see if we’ve got this straight: in Angie’s book it’s fine to scoop up any information she fancies from our site, so long as she doesn’t admit that it came from us, because that would be “cosying up”. Right. Got it.
Frankly, we wrote a “nice” article about the Echo Truths/Lulu/Kitty videos because we agreed with much of what they were saying, and thought they had worked hard to come up with the information they had. We are happy to help anyone—troofer or not—get the straight goods on Hoaxtead, because that’s what we do. We look at facts, assess them, attribute them properly, and present them for others to see, judge for themselves, and if desired, use them.
In her usual smarmy style, Angela managed to squeeze in a reprise of her false allegations against commenters on this blog:
I’ve been told the pseudonym of Spiny Norman and one other are documented paedophiles, like prosecuted, in the newspapers, the whole, you know, names, addresses, contact details, everything, the whole nine yards, and I’m waiting [sic] confirmation on that but I completely believe it.
Of course we all know the source of Angela’s “intel” here; this person has been banging the same drum for several months to anyone who’ll listen. Problem is, he’s a known compulsive liar, so the only people who take him seriously are those of Angie’s ilk—those who are as dishonest and smarmy as he is.
If any of us were “documented paedophiles”, why would this person not simply forward the information to Angela right away, rather than playing silly buggers and promising to send it “later”? If it exists, let’s see it. Up front, right here, right now.
If he cannot produce it, it doesn’t exist. Simple as.
As usual, Angela has learned nothing from her previous adventures in “ooh, I have some amazing ‘intel’ for you, I’ll send it along…later….”
Anyone remember the Ellagate fiasco from last autumn? Angela finally had to cave and admit that the person involved had nothing, was never going to send her anything, and that Angela had made a great flaming idiot of herself with grandiose allegations about Ella having participated in making child sex abuse videos. There were no videos. There was no evidence. The person in question was lying. Angela sounded like a Grade A, Number 1 twat.
Plus ça change….