Belinda’s child-abuse theory meshes with Abe’s

Over the past few days we’ve been talking about the videos that Abraham Christie and Ella Draper made of RD’s two children while they were en route to London from Morocco. We’ve discussed how the two children literally provided “too much information”, in contrast to children who are proven sexual abuse survivors, who almost never volunteer more information than the interviewer already knows. And yesterday we talked about how the actual content of the original interviews betrays the fact that all the children’s information came from Abe and Ella. We know this because, in contrast to documented information about child trafficking, group paedophile abuse, “satanic” or ritual abuse, child pornography, and the like, the children’s testimony reflects only the stories told amongst conspiracy theorists. These stories are demonstrably false, but they are immediately recognisable to conspiranoids, who see them as “proof” that the children really were abused by a “cult”.

One of our readers pointed out that another prominent Hampstead SRA hoax promoter had described something very similar to Abraham Christie’s sick and disgusting theory that children who are anally raped at a very young age attain a “glimpse of cosmic consciousness” via stimulation of nerves at the base of the spine, which in turn stimulate the pineal gland in the brain. According to Abe, this causes the children to “crave” anal rape, and it “binds” the victim to his or her abuser as a kind of sex slave.

Interestingly, we found this video of Miles Johnston interviewing Belinda McKenzie, released on 10 November 2014:

At about 40:50, following a longish discussion about how children are snatched from their loving families and used and abused by the evil state, they have this curious exchange:

Belinda: Why are we suddenly not accepting child sacrifice in its modern form, where children are basically raped by senior people? [Senior people? Not sure if this means “senior people in the cult”?]

Miles: They’re wrecking the psyche of the child.

B: When a small child is raped, this sets off some kind of reaction in the brain; trauma travels up the spine through the nervous system to some part of the brain and either opens up or closes down certain faculties, and creates a huge trauma which then causes the brain to go into sort of seizure mode and create a division within itself between the experience as it’s been experienced, and then having to go on live normally after the experience. so a sort of seal barrier is brought up in the brain to seal off that unpleasant, that acutely traumatic experience.

M: Which can lead to alternate personalities and control mechanisms.

B: so you get basically a possibility that a person who’s suffered that trauma basically develops what’s called a split personality, and these are just sort of common terms and common parlance, but something else may be happening behind the barrier where the trauma resides—behind that barrier, which is sort of what you might call unsupervised territory within the brain, could be planted, however that happens, shall we say concepts, or trigger words, or trigger commands, however one…

M: We’re now in MK Ultra and Project Monarch territory.

B: Yes, I don’t have the vocabulary to describe it, and I’m not an in-depth student of it…

M: It would seem that the logic of it is that any species…most species doesn’t usually go into that amount of abuse of its own young.

B: No, it’s unheard of in the animal world.

Does any of this sound strangely familiar?

The concept of “trauma travelling up the spine” to a certain part of the brain, opening or closing certain faculties (such as glimpses of cosmic consciousness, perhaps?), and creating a splitting off so that the child can function normally most of the time. But within the “sealed off” part of the brain, “unsupervised territory”, the experience of anal rape has somehow implanted “concepts, or trigger words, or trigger commands”.

Instead of looking at her like she’s grown an extra head, Miles seems to immediately understand what Belinda is talking about: “We’re now in MK Ultra and Project Monarch territory”, he says.

While this nonsensical view of anal rape of children is utterly foreign to most people, it appears to make perfect sense to Miles and Belinda. They don’t specify that the pineal gland is involved, but the idea that children who’ve been anally raped will develop “special” attributes, while at the same time being emotionally protected from the horror of the experience is almost exactly what Abe and Ella have been trying to push.

A question of timing

We mentioned that this video was uploaded on 10 November 2014—at around the time that Ella turned to Belinda and Sabine for help in having her children returned to her. You might also recall that a few days later, on 14 November, Sabine  created a Dropbox file in which she posted a “witness statement” which Ella had made, in which she named the children, parents, teachers, clergy, and businesses in Hampstead that she and Abe wished to target.

Sabine identified 14 November as the day she was “(c)ontacted by Russian mother of two, then 8 and 9-year-old children, taken into care [custody] by Barnet Police on September 11, 2014 allowing contact with father whom they accused of being the leader of a ‘strange culture’ at a church and school in Hampstead, London”.

On the same day, Charlotte Ward published her autobiographical e-book called Illuminati Party! under the pseudonym “Jacqui Farmer”. She also took down her relatively successful blog, Conspirituality, at around this time.

We don’t know for certain that Belinda made this video with Miles as a kind of aperitif to the main course of the Hampstead SRA hoax, but we do find it curious that she chose that time to speak to Miles about “child-snatching” by the state, her belief that children in care were most likely to be sexually molested by those who looked after them, and her strange beliefs about how anal rape could be used as part of MK Ultra “super-soldier” training.

That’s purely speculative on our part, we freely admit.

What we do know, however, is that Abraham Christie and Ella Draper were far from alone in their peculiar beliefs about the effects of anal rape on children. Is it any wonder, then, that when the two children were forced to make the videos describing the alleged “cult” and its activities, it immediately resonated with its intended audience, who were bowled over that two young children could recite such things in such detail?