Kristie Sue Costa, Abe and Ella’s current Fart-sniffer in Chief, has been keeping her head below the parapet lately, at least as far as the Hampstead SRA hoax is concerned. However, she made an appearance on Saturday, publishing one of her epic whinges on her “Believe the Children Except When They Say Things You Don’t Want to Hear” Facebook page. She was annoyed with us, but even more annoyed at her good old ex-friend Angela Power-Disney:
Happy Saturday all!
This post is directed at those attacking our admins on a personal level as well as our position on the Hampstead Cover Up. First, I’d like to take a moment to re-affirm our position on this case, we are NOT associated with the mother of the two children, Ella Gareeva. While we volunteer our support for her case, she has been timid to trust too many people since she has been the victim of massive infiltration attempts, we understand her lack of confidence and trust in activists has been hard to overcome. We do not push her to support our work, we only hope the fruits of our labors will help bring awareness to her case. We believe her children’s testimonies and the rest of the evidence in her case, thus the name of our page…We support this mother in her hope and attempts to see her children again and legally regain custody.
There have been many activists who have failed in their attempts to undermine this case. Our main antagonists are associates of the father’s, including the father himself at a website called “Hoaxtead Research”. This website was set up to harass and intimidate supporters of the children and their mother. We are heavily monitored by this group, this is expected.
One supporter that has attempted to undermine this case is Angela Power Disney who came out September 2016 saying she had received intel about the mother being complicit in her children’s abuse and a member of the cult. We knew this was not true due to the children’s testimonies where they said their mother was not a member and she did not abuse them. The children made this very clear and their body language showed they were telling the truth plus their love for their mother was very apparent in their videos. We took a stand against this attempt to undermine the mother as well as the children’s testimonies by showing evidence to the contrary. Our first stand, titled “Panem & Circenses” was written on 17 Sep 2016., three short days after Angela’s video came out on 14 Sept. 2016 telling us about how hacked computers gave evidence of Ella being the ring leader of the cult, not the father. Our second stand against Angela with more evidence of her lies and attempts to discredit the case was on 3 Feb, 2017 in a post titled “Clowns to the Left, Jokers to the Right” (
Since these posts were written, Sonya and I have been attacked by Angela calling me a “LIAR” when she is the person who lied about Ella and her complicity. She’s spoken about me in several of her videos that I won’t link as they are painfully long and completely untrue anyway. It’s not my fault she’s an idiot and can’t read a DATE on a post when it was written. It’s not my fault she listens to our opposition when they send her messages then agrees with them. It’s not my fault her reputation is being called into question, she’s the one that threw Ella under the bus. It makes one wonder what side she’s on, is she now considered opposition to the Hampstead case? Indeed. Yet she calls herself the “face of the Hampstead case”, which is completely laughable, the children are the faces of the Hampstead cover up. She has nothing to do with the Hampstead case, the mother straight up disassociated herself from Angela in April 2016 in a video titled, “Hampstead Cover Up illuminati Cult Child Abuse & Psyop Agents Exposed” Angela being one of the psyop agents they exposed.
Angela has recently accused me of being a CIA operative…I laugh while typing that. Angela, please ask yourself this question, would the CIA take the side of the mother in this case? Would the CIA stand up against all of the other alphabet agencies involved in this case? Would the CIA block a video in the UK and NOT the US? Think about that for a moment. And think about that the next time you push Arthur Charbel Kaoutal to speak out against Sonya and I.
Angela has a reputation among the ‘truther’ community of having whistleblowers sectioned, arrested or murdered. One such sectioning was a friend of mine in Australia, Arthur Kaoutal. Due to Angela’s influence and prodding, Arthur has decided Sonya and I are ‘Candle Holders’ for the royal family. Angela telephoned Arthur while he was in the mental facility and recorded their conversation.
Within this phone call, Arthur claims Sonya to be “the wickedest woman he’s ever come across”. Is it ‘wicked’ to stand up to blatant LIES while supporting the mother in this case? Is it ‘wicked’ to believe the children’s testimonies that their mother was not in involved in their abuse? Is it ‘wicked’ to take the stand for truth against all that would believe Angela’s ‘intel’? No, it is NOT.
It is amazing to me that these people can put out lies about us and not expect us to fight back. That we get harassed for defending the mother, Ella, tells us that there are massive forces working to destroy any person who dares stand for truth. I believe the children, that’s the reason I created this page. I highly doubt HRH Queen Elizabeth or her agents would believe the children. Don’t you, Arthur and Angela? Your campaign to discredit us, will not work, any THINKING human being can see who the liars are. As Abraham has said, and I quote, “Like all who sip at the poisoned chalice that is the Hampstead Cover Up with IGNOBLE INTENT they shall reap what they sow.”
Tl:dr—”Waah, waah, waah, nobody likes me, Angie is a poopoohead, and I hate Arfur now too, so there”.
And then along came Snake…
After Saturday’s whinge-fest you’d think she’d have had enough, but on Sunday she turned up in the comments section of Ella’s video from early March, where Snake Logan asked her the Dreaded Question. When we asked Abe this question on Friday, he folded like a bad poker hand; we wondered how Kristie Sue might respond. Here’s what happened:
Kris’ response was nothing if not predictable:
But Snake wasn’t having any:
Kristie Sue tried another detour:
But answer came there none. So Snake tried again:Kristie Sue tried another diversion tactic, which Snake immediately answered with a hay-maker:Spiny Norman pitched in, urging Kristie Sue to just answer the damn question, already:
Kristie Sue, of course, was wounded that we would accuse her of having wasted her time on Abe and Ella’s sick fantasy:
Inexplicably, Kristie Sue came back with a series of quotes from the IPCC letter:
Nice try, no cigar:
And there we left it for the day.
Apparently this is one question the Hoaxtead mob just cannot bring themselves to answer. As Spiny says, the entire credibility of the case rests on it, but still no one seems willing to touch it. Wonder why that could be?