It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a troofer on the trail of a juicy bit of conspiritainment will throw aside not only reason and logic, but also scruples and dignity. And thus it is that Kristie Sue Costa, currently the de facto Hoaxtead-Pusher in Chief, can be found earnestly posting away about the evil child sex traffickers of both Hoaxtead and Pizzagate…and yet the platform she currently favours is Voat.
What’s wrong with Voat? you ask. Most of us know it as the site to which the Pizzagate discussion decamped when that subreddit was removed from Reddit. Prior to the massive injection of popularity it received from Pizzagate refugees, Voat was mainly known as a rabidly pro-free-speech site for people who hate fat people (yes, seriously), and for people looking for (barely legal) sexualised images of children.
You heard us right.
In fact, two of Voat’s most popular subverses (kind of like subreddits, only….well, all right, exactly the same as a subreddit, only on Voat, not Reddit) were v/jailbait and v/thefappening. For those unfamiliar with the terminology, “jailbait” refers to young girls below the age of consent, portrayed in a sexualised manner; “fappening” refers to masturbation.
When Voat removed v/jailbait a year ago, they replaced it with v/youngladies, which sounds a great deal more decorous. However, it turns out that v/youngladies, like its predecessor, is full of pictures of very young girls, either scantily clad, or posed to look seductive, or both. In other words, Voat has changed the name of the subverse to avoid legal issues, but the content is the same.
Here’s a sample of what we found there (we blurred the image; the original was much worse):
Did your stomach just turn? Ours did.
Kristie Sue, who posts to Voat’s Pizzagate threads regularly under the name ListenUp, seems oblivious to the fact that the platform she uses to denounce imaginary child sex trafficking is a known haven for those who enjoy fantasizing over all-too-real sexualised images of children. The little girl in the image above looked about nine years old to us; and any child posed that way, with that look on her face, is either being sexually abused or groomed for it.
Here’s a hint for Kris: if you want to help fight child sex trafficking, start in your own back garden.
Hypocrisy, thy name is Troofer
That’s not the first time, nor will it be the last, that we’ve caught Kristie Sue saying one thing and doing quite another.
For example, the other day she was waxing eloquent over on one of MKD’s excellent videos, where she stated “I think we can all agree that death threats should not be tolerated, in any form”: How very noble of her!
And yet within a few days, she was patting the psychopathic Kane Slater on the back:
Nice that she’s so supportive of her friend, right? Until you remember that this particular friend is in the habit of spewing death threats on an industrial scale. Here are a couple from this past week:
So apparently death threats are completely unacceptable in any context…but when one of your fellow hoax-pushers does it, it’s okay to look the other way. It’s great to pretend you’re battling child sex trafficking…but when the site you choose to use features sexualised images of children, it’s okay to pretend that’s not happening.
It’s all about turning off your moral compass, and putting your brain in neutral. Which, when you think about it, is something that the Hoaxtead mobsters are very, very good at.