Kristie Sue Costa tries to petition IPCC

With Abe and Ella having withdrawn from the ring, Sabine and Neelu sidelined, Angela Power-Disney disqualified after her “Ella made child sex abuse videos” flub, and everyone else either charged or awaiting charges later this month, it seems almost inevitable that Kristie Sue Costa would step up and try to take over promoting the Hampsterad SRA hoax.

So it came as no surprise yesterday when she posted this petition, addressed to the UK Independent Police Complaints Commission.

Let us pause here for a discreet snicker: apparently Kristie Sue has not cottoned onto the fact that the IPCC has already released its report, and has point-blank refused Abe and Ella’s appeal. So her petition is at very most a beau geste; at worst it’s a cynical sham, intended only to stir up rage against the Hampstead community and RD.

kristie-sue-ipetitions-1-2016-12-12kristie-sue-costa-ipetitions-2-2016-12-12The petition contains the usual laughable claims. You know—the case wasn’t investigated properly; evidence was concealed; what about the tattoos?; the medical exams showed the kids were telling the truth…yadda yadda yadda.

Each of these claims has been thoroughly and comprehensively debunked here and elsewhere, but why confuse Kristie Sue and friends with facts?

To no one’s shock, the usual band of mouth-breathers, window-lickers, and bail breachers have assembled here:

kristie-sue-costa-ipetition-comments-2016-12-12

What can we do about it?

This petition is doomed from the outset, in the sense that the IPCC will ignore it, and with good reason: they’ve already reviewed the investigation, found two areas which required correction, and have clearly stated that the rest of Abe and Ella’s complaints simply don’t hold water.

However, we think it’s worth attempting to have it pulled down, for a few reasons:

  1. It’s unlawful: since early 2015, there has been a court order in place prohibiting the sharing of information that would reveal the identity of the children, and that would continue to unlawfully harass RD, the children’s father.
  2. It promotes a fake news story. While we generally refer to Hoaxtead as, well, a hoax, it can just as easily be tagged as “fake news”: it’s intended to manipulate the gullible and paranoid among us, and has been disproven over and over again.
  3. It is in breach of minors’ privacy—as we’ve said many times, the children in this hoax have been terribly used and abused, and this is just one more site that’s spreading their names and images across the internet (if you check the links, all of which lead back to Abe & Ella’s blogs).

If you’d like to help get this petition pulled from the iPetitions site, you can check out the site’s Terms and Conditions page, which spells out the terms of use. Then go to the Contact Us page, where you can send iPetitions your complaint.

Remember, the more people who object to this petition, the more likely it is to be pulled down. We’ve also reported the petition to the police, who we suspect will take a dim view of the petition itself, as well as of some of the bail breaches taking place on the site.

Let’s send a message loud and clear: hands off Hampstead!

hoaxtead-roman-centurions

Advertisements

64 thoughts on “Kristie Sue Costa tries to petition IPCC

  1. I would go much further than that. Hopefully you have kept screenshots of the entire petition.

    It’s time for the father to become pro-active and fight this mob and not simply leave it up to others. He should contact a US lawyer- there will be 100s who would take on the case as we know this woman has assets- and threaten her with a lawsuit for harassment and defamation. At the very least she will need to get her own lawyer to defend the action and they will advise her to back off and reach a settlement before she bankrupts herself with legal fees.

    The same with a UK solicitor as there are British citizens breaking criminal and civil law. He should also contact police and his MP and demand they enforce the law.

    I’m having far more success with Google, Facebook etc in a case that is far more simple than this one which doesn’t involve criminal law, just civil law.

    Frankly I think it’s becoming a bit tiresome that the father seems to be relying (or maybe he is doing something we don’t know about) on others to fight his battles.

    Innocents have been drawn into this hoax and suffered. They have been attacked and had their lives upended just because they live in a particular suburb. We see now the case is being weaved in the dreadful @pizzagate hoax that has already inspired a gunman to enter a restaurant and fire shots. No-one was injured but it could have been far worse.

    So I think RD has a responsibility to step up and now become active in defeating these dangerous trolls. It’s understandable that it is difficult and probably emotionally hard for him. But this is getting out of hand and affecting a lot of innocent people. He has a responsibility to his own children and to all the innocent parties involved. He has the power and ability to make change.

    Liked by 2 people

    • The problem is, when RD does get involved its thrown back at him in a way that makes him look bad (the bbc interview) A lawsuit would be good though as this farce has gone on long enough, Kristie Sue and her ilk are the child abusers now. Kristie? I know you are reading this, this is not a game, you are wrecking any chance for those kids to have a normal life, one day you will have to answer for this.

      Like

      • Thank you : please don’t get me wrong.

        I would & will always support anyone going through what RD( and his kids) is and I fully understand that people can wish to remain in the background as much as possible (especially considering the history of this case)

        I simply cannot stand anyone being attacked because these perverted trolls seem to thrive off the sensation. In fact I only became involved in things like this because of a very elderly lady who became a target of online trolls and the oddest thing was 1. she had never seen a computer let alone the internet and 2. she has since died. In the end she was being accused of satanism and other madness.

        However her family remain and even her lawyer became the target (he eventually got a court order against the troll) and my experience is these cases follow a sort of pattern as they begin to morph into renewed attacks- ie : @pizzagate is now being weaved into the mix. It is of course early days- 2 years or so, and we cannot predict accurately how it will end but I would use whatever legal means at my disposal.
        The police can be hopeless in these matters but you can force them to act.
        I also think it’s treasonable to check we are not aiding in propagating the hoax by trying to finish it off. We are dealing with very disturbed people who are either narcissists, sociopaths or deranged in ways we cannot know.

        Liked by 1 person

    • “The same with a UK solicitor as there are British citizens breaking criminal and civil law. He should also contact police and his MP and demand they enforce the law.”

      Good luck with that… Certain hoaxers, attention-seekers and downright criminals have been getting away with all sorts for years with apparent immunity and even bizarre lengths being gone to in order to actively evade prosecuting them. Demand what you like in the UK. Even if you’re entitled to it you won’t get it – justice that is.

      Like

      • Very true but remember this is a new phenomena : for all the wonders of the internet it has also allowed the deranged, the vicious, the nasty, the ‘over the backyard fence gossipers’ and the Poison Pen Letter authors to all meet up and form communities and they have some power and are dangerous.

        Various governments have been slow to understand the dark side of the net : whatever the truth about Russian hacks on the US election it has caught even the mighty USA off guard.

        Liked by 1 person

        • It’s only relatively new… And I’m afraid some of the evidence I’ve seen indicates that even when the Police have the case against someone spelled out for them, where some people are concerned there is a real will to fail to act. – i.e. Something stinks to high heaven.

          As much as I disagree with it, I can well understand how some people reach the conclusion there must be a blanket high-level cover up of child abuse generally. – And I need to concede that at some level and in some cases they may actually have a point.

          Liked by 1 person

    • I’m hoping that RD and the children are being shielded from most of this rubbish and getting on with as normal a life as possible.

      Like

      • Yes I understand that but at the same time a lot of people are defending him and receiving a lot of flack because of it.
        He could put an end to this by going on the attack and ensuring his defamers and abusers face justice as I very much doubt he and his children will have a normal life ever unless they use the law for their protection.
        As it is- everyone on here could be just pissing in the wind for all we know, building enemies and inflaming the matter by attacking those who continue to expose his children.

        Like

        • RD will be in receipt of good legal advice. And, as much as the points you make with respect to the future for the family are valid, his silence is dignified and well-considered. If action is raised against anyone it will be important not to have ‘fed the trolls’.

          Like

        • To be fair GofS, RD’s main responsibility is to his children. Going “on the attack” would eat up valuable time and resources that would be better spent on healing/helping his family. It’s not his fault that this happened and it’s not his job to put it right. I’d imagine that he is getting legal and other help, and we don’t know what might happen a bit further down the line. Enough rope etc.

          Like

          • A number of people have tied their own hangman’s knots and slipped them over their heads despite quite explicit and frequent warnings from this site.

            Liked by 1 person

    • There’s a great deal going on behind the scenes, GoS; unfortunately it’s not possible to reveal it here, in part because we don’t know the full extent and in part because it would violate confidentiality. I think it’s fair to say that everyone who is able to do so is taking action on different fronts, and the combined effort is paying off.

      Liked by 2 people

    • She doesn’t need to be extradited. I have just engaged a lawyer in the USA in a case I am involved in and it hasn’t cost a penny up front. This woman is financially vulnerable and has breached US laws and contrary to beliefs, it is actually much easier to sue for defamation in the US than it is in the UK.
      There are now US lawyers specialising in internet libel and harassment- the lawyer I have engaged is handling about 6 similar cases and they are for hateful websites and posts that are mild by comparison.

      Liked by 2 people

      • Also, under US defamation law, the burden of proof lies with the plaintiff, whereas in the UK it lies with the defendant. In other words, if I were to sue you for libelling me in America, I would have to prove what you’ve said about me isn’t true, whereas over here you’d have to prove it is.

        Like

        • It’s a bit more complicated than that but malice can easily be proved in this case as Kristie Sue Costa is an instigator of defamatory websites.
          However far more important is that she is clearly guilty of breaching US Federal harassment and stalking laws that apply to the internet and probably local state laws and this carries a long jail sentence. Civil claims for damages could follow that.

          People seem to take the view that you can say anything on the internet under the US Constitution’s freedom of speech but it’s just not true.

          Liked by 1 person

      • I avoided looking at that petition but this morning I tried and could not find it so it’s a win for those who complained.
        She will pop up elsewhere though.
        More evidence that Kristie Sue Costa is a serial stalker. I wonder how her local community feel about it? There seem to be some Costas involved in local Christian churches in her area.

        Liked by 1 person

        • You’re right, she’ll probably pop up in some other guise; she’s a self-righteous campaigner, rather like Sabine, who is convinced that anyone who doesn’t like what she’s doing is evil and suspect. They sprout like mushrooms after rain…and like mushrooms, they grow best in shit.

          Like

  2. It really should have started “We, a small group of SRA conspiracy fanatics do not believe the children and instead believe life long criminal, fugitive and known child beater,Abraham Christie.”

    Liked by 2 people

  3. Very good piece! “Let’s send a message loud and clear: hands off Hampstead!” – indeed!

    The original “Believe The Children” wasn’t really about believing children at all, of course. It was about believing satanic-panic promoting adults. Here’s a related narrative which will reveal some previously unspoken truths. It will be long, so long that I’ve broken it into parts.

    My example will be the Franklin Cover-up aka the Franklin Scandal aka the Nebraska-Franklin child prostitution ring allegations. You may have heard about this, it is wildly popular among SRA conspiranoids, truthers and even some serious CSA researchers/campaigners. But if you believe you already “know the story”…I guarantee that I’ll be giving you info and a perspective that you’ve never seen before. I’ll zip through a narrative, but litter it with notations [#] and provide details & references in a later post.

    We all know about the current UK obsession with allegations about & evidence of widespread historic abuse of “children in care”. During the early-mid 1970’s, US law enforcement uncovered and took down a child prostitution and pornography conspiracy, involving privately owned/run housing and services for; ‘unwanted’/unadoptable/homeless children, (many of whom were homosexually oriented), juvenile prostitutes, and juvenile sex offenders, operating in several states.[1] So blatant and arrogant was this criminal network, the “Better Life” conspiracy, they actually had a “how to set up your own, government funded, ‘boy-lover’ run, fraudulent non-profit charity service for disadvantaged children” business plan for new members. Dr. Judianne Densen-Gerber, a lawyer and psychiatrist who founded the drug treatment program Odyssey House communities, was also a dedicated and powerful social-political campaigner in the 1970’s – ’80’s. One of her campaigns, circa 1976-’79, involved a national tour lecturing to local legislators, social service professionals and grass-roots child welfare organizations about criminal infiltration of housing & services for “children under government care”/ foster children, resulting in their exploitation for prostitution and pornography.

    Inspired by Dr Judianne’s horror stories, grass-roots child welfare organizations in Nebraska determined to take control of the management and oversight of that state’s foster child services, and formulated legislation designed to transfer that power out of the hands of Social Services bureaucrats and into their own “Foster Care Review Board”.
    An early and long-term champion of this legislation, and of the Foster Care Review Board itself, was State Senator and lawyer John DeCamp. [2]
    Early and determined opponents of this legislation and of the Foster Care Review Board itself, included Nebraska Governor Bob Kerrey the Department of Social Services management and prominent local academics in related fields. Multiple legislative attempts, sponsored by Governor Kerrey, were made to return control to Social Services bureaucracy between 1983 and 1985. All were defeated thanks to the protective efforts of Senator John DeCamp and his partisans; Speaker Bill Nichol, Senator Dave Landis, Senator Jerome Warner and Senator Loran Schmit [2]

    There were two major financial institution failures in Nebraska during the first few years of Governor Kerrey’s term of 1983-’85 – NOT The Franklin Credit Union, that came later. John Decamp chaired a State Senate investigation into these failures, in 1986, during which Gov. Kerrey himself was unceremoniously and frankly grilled about his governance failures and associations to/with the management of these failed institutions.

    In 1984, John DeCamp announced his intention to run for United States Senator [3] on the Republican ticket. He was warned by party officials, they preferred to give the nomination to a women for the next election campaign. He ignored that and continued his own nomination campaign.
    Not long after, a young female boarder in the DeCamp household falsely accused DeCamp and his wife of sexually abusing their little girl, based on photos of the toddler in the bathtub. Subsequent investigations – by the Department of Social Services, and then by Lincoln Police, reported finding no evidence of abuse.
    But, a Republican party functionary filed a civil petition to remove their daughter from their custody, citing “abusive” child-rearing practices. Many months later, during which some Omaha news media ran accusatory “expose” style stories about the case and the DeCamps, a Judge declared them unequivocally not guilty. Ultimately, however, DeCamp lost the Republican nomination for USS and lost his next re-election campaign for State Senator as well. [3]

    John DeCamp was apparently “taken out”, politically, by a false CSA accusation. If that really was intentional, it may be impossible to exaggerate how stupid a mistake that was, by whomever was involved in engineering it. DeCamp was not just a lawyer, he was also a Vietnam era war hero in some people’s eyes, having co-ordinated the CIA sponsored Phoenix Program of targeted assassinations under future CIA director William Colby, and having participated in the “Operation Babylift” of over 1500 “orphans” from Saigon , just before it fell to the communists. In the 1980’s, now former director William Colby was still DeCamp’s bestest buddy, he was a revered leader in the “retired military intelligence” community of his state, and he was one of the most highly skilled and accomplished “political warfare” veterans in the nation. [3]

    Following his election defeat, DeCamp abandoned party politics and embraced radical populism. Initially, DeCamp cozied up with the Lyndon Larouche movement (or cult), “a political and cultural network promoting Lyndon LaRouche and his ideas”, which controls many companies, organizations and political-cultural groups and advocates quasi-populist policies such as reform of the world financial system. DeCamp became very friendly with the Larouche “intelligence analyst” and author Anton Chaitkin – who also ran/ controlled a number of private-internal and “for hire” intelligence networks.
    Later, DeCamp embraced the “individual sovereignty” and “constitutionalist” populism of the Christian Patriot movement, and volunteered to be consigliere to the Montana Freeman militia – effectively gaining the fanatical support of a private army of mercenaries capable of “blending into” the rest of the population to carry out…who knows what?…activities anywhere in the US. [4]
    Surely, woe betides anyone who might be on JohnDeCamp’s list of enemies – such as all those persons that he blamed for a conspiracy to cause his political “assassination”, by false accusations of child sexual abuse;

    – Governor Kerrey, presumed to have carried grudges against DeCamp for protecting the Foster Care Review Board and publicly humiliating Kerrey through the earlier banking scandal hearings.
    – Both state and federal Republican Party organizers and functionaries, who might have been involved in campaigning and lobbying against DeCamp for the USS nomination
    – State and federal Republican Party leadership, who would have made the decisions about when and how to take DeCamp down, and issued the orders to organizers and functionaries
    – The ownership of, and journalists working for, the news media that slandered and defamed him and his wife during the investigation
    – Local and Federal law enforcement, who failed to detect, investigate and expose a conspiracy which caused his public esteem to fall from “hero” to “suspected child abuser”

    In November of 1988, FBI and IRS investigators seized control of the Franklin Credit Union’s physical assets and closed it down. As a result of the investigation, Republican Party organizer and functionary Lawrence (Lerry) King was found to have stolen nearly $40 million from the credit union which he ran. He was indicted on 40 criminal counts including conspiracy, fraud, and embezzlement. In 1991, King was convicted and the Franklin Credit Union collapsed.
    There was an investigation into all this by the Nebraska legislature’s Unicameral Banking Commitee, of course, but we will only be concerned with a parallel investigation into allegations about a Franklin related pedophile ring, undertaken by a subcommittee – a subcommittee chaired by:
    John DeCamp’s most stalwart old political ally and champion of the Foster Care Review Board – Senator Loran Schmit.

    Liked by 1 person

    • About six months before the “subcommittee to investigate allegations of sexual abuse and prostitution of minors by a pedophile ring linked to Larry King and Franklin Credit Union” was formed, and three months before the Credit Union was closed by federal investigators, a Carol Stitt – director of the Foster Care Review Board – sent a letter to the Nebraska Attorney General, alleging a child exploitation ring linked to Larry King. This would be Carol Stitt, the director of a Foster Care Review Board that owes its continued existence to ex-Senator John DeCamp, a citizen-led Review Board that would have been permanently shut down and dismantled years before if not for its champion John DeCamp – accusing a federal Republican Party organizer of masterminding the sexual abuse and prostitution of children. Oh yes! And it gets better…

      In 1985, a 16 year old Nebraska girl named Eulice Washington and her younger sister disclosed to their biological grandmother, that their adopted parents – the Webbs – had been physically abusing them for many years. These accusations are supported by documentation that the Webbs had physically abused other children in their care. The Webbs retaliated by legally ‘disowning’ the girls, and they were placed in the home of foster parent Kathleen Sorensen – who claimed to specialize in the care of abused, traumatized and subsequently hard to place children. In 1986, while in Sorensen’s care, Eulice is alleged to have made many more accusatory disclosures to Sorensen herself. Among these, Eulice is alleged to have claimed that the Webb’s relative – Larry King of the Franklin Credit Union – flew her and other teens to upscale parties in other states, where Eulice was forced to pose naked on display for the guests and endure their sexual molestations. She is said to have claimed that “very important people”, whose exact identities she never learned, including Republican Party official and politicians, attended these parties, and that she observed some of them sexually abusing boys from the Boystown children’s village. There was no reciprocal validation by former Boystown residents, however, none claimed to have been on these trips with Eulice. At one point, Eulice is supposed to have claimed that she saw and recognized then Vice-President George Bush at one of these parties. Some of Eulice’s disclosures were supposedly witnessed by Sorensen’s friend Kristen Hallberg.

      Kristen Hallberg was a “resident advisor” at the Ute Halle residential psychiatric facility for teenage girls in Omaha in 1986. While “advising” a 12 year old reident named Shawneta Moore, Hallberg claimed the girl spontaneously disclosed having been abused by a local prostitution and pornography ring through local children’s recreational charities. Hallberg claimed, over time this girl made more detailed disclosures, culminating in a horrific tale of witnessing child rape, torture and sacrifice by a satanic cult that her abusers were the leaders of. [5]

      Far away in California, Jackie McGauley was one of the McMartin Preschool case parents. She claimed that her daughter had been abused by the owner’s adult son – Ray Bucky. McGauley also happened to be best friends with Judy Johnson, the McMartin mother whose claims about her young son Mathew being sodomized – and she suspected, by Bucky – are often cited as the origin of that case. There has been a lot of analysis, and speculation, about Johnson’s mental health, possible addiction problems and parental competence, over the years. Sometimes she is depicted as a delusional hysteric, whose fantasies of child abuse supposedly fuelled the original satanic ritual abuse panic. This is not the objective truth of the matter, however. The truth is that Johnson’s friend Jackie McGauley was, by her own words, the real “SRA typhoid Mary” of the preschool/ daycare/ foster care SRA panic. [6]

      In fact, the most likely perpetrator of whatever abuse Johnson’s son and McGauley’s daughter might have suffered would not be Ray Bucky – it would be the boyfriend Jackie McGauley had at that time. McGauley and Johnson’s children were frequently playdate visitors at each others homes, and sometimes unaccompanied by their own parent. It is very plausible that both McGauley’s child and Johnson’s son were occaisionally looked after, in McGauley’s home, solely by this boyfriend when McGauley was out of the house. And unlike Ray Bucky, for whom no objective evidence documenting a sexual interest in little children was ever presented , McGauley’s boyfriend left behind a copy of the infamous “Lollitots” CSA images magazine amongst other possessions in her house after they broke up. That’s objective evidence. McGauley did accuse this boyfriend of molesting her daughter, prior to when she believed that Bucky must have done so, but she never mentioned that this boyfriend would have had unsupervised access to Mathew Johnson as well.

      Jackie McGauley met with Dr Lawrence Pazder, early in the investigation, and states:
      “It is true about Pazder introducing the idea of SRA to us. Some read his book later, I never read it through. It was Michele’s case and I don’t particularly like to read stuff about other peoples’ cases. Larry was introduced to a small group of parents in early 80s by 20/20 producer Ken Wooden who did the series on our case. Ken did a whole show focusing on satanism (some words I refuse to capitalize.. like satanism and ted just out of principle.) Larry went back to Canada but Ken talked extensively to parents about the idea od satanism”.
      Jackie McGauley organized the first “SRA child victim’s parents group”, which she called “Affirming Children’s Truth”, and held the first lay-led for-profit conference on the subject. By 1987, McGauley was living with clinically paranoid “satanic abuse and murder cults are everywhere, and they run our society” retired FBI agent Ted Gunderson. John DeCamp and Ted Gunderson were buddies, they worked together on the Larouche cult publication: “EIR Special publication on Satanism” in 1990.

      According to Jackie McGauley, the Nebraska ladies – Kathleen Sorenson & Kristen Hallberg, “were at my place in 1985 or perhaps 1984. McMartin broke in 1983” and “The Nebraska ladies heard of our conference and flew to L.A. to attend. They happened to stay with me at my Apartment. The details of their case was “just” another case to me. I didn’t even understand their entire story”. But that, of course, was because they didn’t have their own story to tell at that time. Kathleen Sorenson & Kristen Hallberg didn’t have their own “child’s SRA or elite pedophile ring allegation stories” to tell, until 1986. So what were they doing in McGauley’s apartment, attending “Affirming Children’s Truth” meetings, in 1984 or ’85? They were there, learning how to manipulate children into telling you what you want to hear from them, how to guide and shape the child’s fantasy stories so it appears they are making exactly the allegation that you want/need them to make. And they were doing this “research” on behalf of the very same Foster Care Review Board championed by senator John DeCamp, not long after DeCamp himself had been investigated over a false SRA allegation. Planning for the eventual, vengeful, reversal of false CSA accusations was already underway it seems. [6]
      But why have Vice-president George Bush (senior) written into a fantasy scenario about pedophile parties? What would be the point of that? The point would be, that George Bush replaced DeCamp’s best buddy William Colby as Director of the CIA, on January 30, 1976. Colby’s term as DCI was rough years for the CIA. The CIA’s “Family Jewels,” a list compiled for previous DCI James Schlesinger detailing controversial and, in some cases, illegal activities undertaken by the agency had leaked to investigative journalist Seymour Hersh in 1974. In 1975, the Congressional Church committee was aggressively grilling DCI Colby about these, in public hearings, and suggesting it might be time to dismantle and retire the agency altogether. Colby kept his cool, however, and answered their questions as fully and honestly as he could. He wanted to demonstrate that “those days are over”, by admitting the agency’s mistakes rather than trying to hide them. The rank and file field agents, like DeCamp had been, already respected Colby because he had done his time “as one of them”, and because he had led them on operations “in the field”, rather than issuing blind orders from behind a comfy desk in Washington. They respected him even more for his courageously forthright testimony. But the Ford administration was scared, they thought Colby disclosed too much, too easily. So they effectively fired him, by replacing him with Bush – a whiny, spoiled “rich kid” suspected of forcing Colby out by nagging Ford: “can I have a turn at DCI, can I, can I? I want something important to do…”. Bush was a bureaucratic manager, never a real life operative, but he could be trusted to keep his mouth shut if ordered to do so. Many of the rank and file despised him, and an opportunity to frame him up as a homsexual pedophile, however late in life it might come, must have seemed too delicious to let pass for certain former field officers…
      And it gets even better!
      You have to love this. The first order of business for the Schmit led subcommittee, was to appoint a chief legal counsel. Schmit suggested former DCI Colby – DeCamp’s buddy! – now running a law practice in Washington, and the committee voted to invite him to apply. You probably could have heard DeCamp’s voice coming out of Schmit’s mouth, if you’d listened closely enough. Unbelievable! Colby accepted, what a surprise, and flew out to Nebraska to apply. “Schmit lobbied intensely for Colby…” no doubt, eh? But in the end he was defeated 4 to 3, because Colby wanted too much for his service. He was too expensive. The masterstroke was blown, because Colby was too proud to accept less than his full-scale wage.
      By February 1989, the subcommittee to investigate allegations of child rape and sex trafficking had a chief counsel, and hired their first investigator. More allegations were piling up, through further FCRB reports. Note that – FCRB reports – not Department of Social Services reports, not police investigator reports. More alleged victims were uncovered, more alleged perpetrators identified. Hearings were scheduled, and testimony commenced. And then, the wheels came off. On June 22, 1989, Attorney General Spire testified that, investigative reports frtom the FBI, the Omaha Police and the State Patrol all independently concluded that the FCRB reports did not have substance. CRASH! [3]

      Liked by 2 people

  4. Pingback: Kristie Sue Costa tries to petition IPCC | ShevaBurton. Cross of Change Blog

  5. Good grief David Shurter seems obsessed with Hoaxtead and even has a go at me but by doing so, just shows what a plonker he is. Of course I am anonymous (who wouldn’t be with these lunatics on the loose?) and then makes all sorts of claims about my assumed non-actions under what he claims is “his sickening facade of “compassion”.
    He wouldn’t have a clue what I have done or what I haven’t done. How could he?. I may be a Mother Theresa or a Jack the Ripper for all he knows but it shows that when joining their dots- once they come across a rather wide gap they simply build an imaginary bridge and forge a non-existent link.

    Following his links you come across his youtube video where he angrily stomps around some town center pointing out ‘pedo’ buildings but what his point is, is a mystery.

    Another case of how one of the weirdest aspects of the internet is how compete nutcases have been given a voice with a loud-hailer when they should be in a ward somewhere talking to a chair who thinks likewise.

    Liked by 2 people

    • GOS – that would be Omaha, Nebraska. (see above)

      Another of the great ironies of the whole Franklin Scandal indecipherable web of truths, half-truths and falsehoods, is that there really had been a loosely connected child prostitution and pornography ring going on in Omaha, Nebraska – and if you’ve been paying attention all this time you might have guessed that its the same one that David Shurter’s perverted “friends” were convicted of abusing boys through:
      “13 Charged in Porn Probe; Boys Taped, Debauched, December 19, 1985, Omaha World-Herald (metro): Omaha police began a roundup Thursday of 13 men facing a total of 99 charges coming from a six-week, citywide investigation into sexual exploitation of boys. [The list included Shurter’s buddies Walter Carlson and Mark Andersen.]”
      There were others, of course. Ironically, one of the worst perps ends up being portrayed as a tragic victim and an ultimately heroic – albeit unstable – whistleblower. That’s Troy Boner. Circa 1985, Boner was a drug-addicted teen selling himself to gay men and the occaisional genuine pederast that are always hanging around a big city’s gay community – sharking for inexperienced or homeless & desperate, gay youth to exploit. As he grew older and less desirable to the “chickenhawks”, Boner started seducing younger males into becoming hooked on heroin and then selling their services to his old clientelle. Who knows how many young lives Troy Boner personally destroyed in this manner. Dozens? He should have been arrested and prosecuted the first time he mentioned younger boys at one of the sex parties he attended, because he probably brought the kid(s) with him!

      Liked by 1 person

      • Yes, it’s been covered before that Shurter (by his own admission) is close personal friends with (and vehement defender of) two convicted pederastes.

        And lest we forget that Shurter himself has admitted to murdering little boys and raping their corpses. He also claims that he attempted to murder a police officer by pouring petrol over him (in front of his children) and trying to set fire to him.

        Other than that, Dave is a most charming dinner guest.

        Liked by 2 people

        • Tribute to all intravenous drug victims, especially the Glasgow boys – (1980’s) – whose only memorial has been that wretched trainspotting movie…

          Like

  6. Pingback: Another petition? Not so fast… | HOAXTEAD RESEARCH

Comments are closed.