What part of ‘done & dusted’ does Drifloud not get?

Over the past several days we’ve been posting snippets of the response to Abe and Ella’s IPCC appeal, which have been appearing in heavily redacted form on Drifloud’s Twitter page.

Drippy seems reluctant to release the entire document on his friends’ behalf, for obvious reasons: the results are hardly encouraging for the Hoaxtead mob. It’s clearly irking Drippy greatly to have to release the report, even accompanied with the best sarcasm he can muster. (Advice to Drippy: leave it to the pros, old man. You’re really not cut out for it.)

To review: in the first piece that Drippy leaked, we learn that DCI John Foulkes agrees  with his officers’ decision to remove RD’s children from Ella’s care, as she was failing to protect them from Abe’s abuse, and her mental health was in question.

In the second piece, DCI Foulkes tries to explain the concept of ‘correct police procedure’, which  zooms about a mile over Drippy’s head. However, people of normal intelligence would understand that if a person withdraws the allegations they’ve made, the police are no longer able to progress the investigation. Not a difficult concept…for most of us.

And in the hilariously awful third piece, Drippy tries to prove that the police were lying when they claimed that the Yaohirou recording was locked up in a police storage facility in Chingford at the time the crime was reported to them. He winds up proving the opposite, in a nicely executed own goal.

Apparently Drippy’s friends haven’t even noticed his brilliant attempts to ‘expose’ the IPCC report, though, as one bright spark asks him whether the report is even out yet.

Let’s eavesdrop:

TornadoNewsLink really needs to keep up—does he think Drippy spends all his time hammering out unreadable tweets for the fun of it? Yes, of course the damn IPCC report is out. Do pay attention.

Drippy reveals that Abe and Ella are attempting to draft yet another appeal, which sounds like it’ll be almost as much fun as a heart attack; we really can’t wait.

And then the kicker: Drippy says he’s already written to Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe, head of the MET, and he hasn’t responded for the usual reason: “he’s INVOLVED – the MET POLICE are rotten from top down”.

At this point we nearly snorted our tea out our noses, as we had a vision of Sir H-H opening his email and discovering one of Drippy’s interminable diatribes, signed by ‘a conscious living being’.

Ah, to have been a fly on the wall at that moment.