Yesterday we published the transcript of an explosive video conversation between Sabine and Angie, in which the two women discussed (among other things) their orchestrated campaign of death threats against RD, and their attempts to locate his children (presumably in order to kidnap them).
While the video itself is horrifying to listen to—the malevolence and hypocrisy really reach epic proportions—once we had turned it over to the authorities we were left to wonder: why would Angie release such a thing? Surely even she cannot be so completely inept as to ‘forget’ not to publish the video, especially when she’d gone to great lengths to implore any listeners to keep it private and share it with caution.
Our conclusion: it’s yet another Patented Angie Smoke-screen.
As commenter JW pointed out, Angie called Sabine, and then directed the conversation towards issues that she’s well aware Sabine should not be discussing while her legal case is under way.
Why would Angie try to implicate Sabine?
Angie is very good at one thing: taking care of Angie.
In the past few weeks, we’ve revealed a great deal about her that she would really rather keep private. We’ve investigated her fraudulent actions in regard to the Kenya Project, we’ve revealed her questionable motives in salting the collection plate for her own GoFundMe campaign; and we’ve demonstrated the impossibility of many of the fantastical claims she’s made about her own achievements and qualifications. We’ve also questioned her actions in regard to her benefits claims and various other dodgy activities.
None of this paints Angela in a very favourable light.
If we were accused of this kind of activity, you can bet that our first actions would be to present the relevant receipts, account statements, or other official documentation, in order to clear our reputations and ensure that we were acting with complete transparency.
Angie’s response: blow smoke. And we’re not just talking about her unfortunate nicotine habit. Whenever she’s accused of anything, her immediate response is to start shouting and pointing in the opposite direction.
For instance, when she was allegedly the victim of a poison pen campaign that accused her of being a charity scammer earlier this year (apparently we’re not the only ones who’ve noticed), she didn’t produce receipts or even try to explain what had happened. No, she made a video, which she captioned:
Published on Jan 21, 2016
The GOOD news is due to pressure exerted by campaigners and media attention worldwide, the planned handover of the children to the Father they allege abused them and pimped them out to a ritual abuse ring in HAMPSTEAD, on February 1st 2016 has been INDEFINITELY SUSPENDED by Social Services who have them ‘in care’. Also, the INDEPENDENT POLICE COMPLAINTS COMMISSION has UPHELD a complaint by their Mother that the METROPOLITAN POLICE failed to properly investigate the most serious ALLEGATIONS. Speaking out WORKS though the price is high. The price of SILENCE is your integrity JUDGE FOR YOURSELVES
Is it just us?
We don’t see a single word in there that addresses the question at hand; instead, there’s a lot of flailing and wailing about HAMPSTEAD, with extra all-caps for EMPHASIS and a bunch of lies about the IPCC and so forth.
It’s a huge red herring, designed to draw people’s attention away from the fact that she’s been accused of being a fraud.
In the case of yesterday’s video with Sabine, Angie is once again creating a giant smokescreen, attempting to throw attention back toward Sabine and away from herself and her own shady dealings.
And if Sabine happens to be affected by the fallout, well, that’s not Angie’s problem, is it?