With her 8 April court date looming, Sabine McNeill is frantically trying to backpedal her way out of charges of witness intimidation, which could conceivably result in her spending time in prison. Sabine, who along with Neelu Berry faces charges for having illegally released Neelu’s witness statements on her ‘In the Best Interests of the Whistleblower Kids’ blog, has now replaced those statements with the following hand-written note:
Too little, too late
The statement, which Sabine says she penned during her most recent arrest on 10 January, makes the surprising claim that “while I believe I published the article in question, I do not remember any details at all”.
I am surprised that it took the witness 10 months to let me know of the intimidation I caused.
I am very sorry and apologise.
I am also surprised that the reason for arresting me required a surprise visit at night, even though I had informed my solicitor of the two phone calls I had from PC Davey.
My solicitor assured me that he would arrange for the interview.
I am now carrying it out without him.
Sabine McNeill
P.s. I closed the blog Whistleblower Kids a few days ago.
Is this intended to be an apology? If so, it falls far short—as usual, Sabine takes absolutely no responsibility for her own appalling behaviour, but tries to shift the blame onto everyone else: her victims (there are more than one), the police, her solicitor…everyone is to blame for this sorry situation, but not Sabine. No, no, no!
As for her claim that she ‘closed the blog’ a few days ago: um, nope. It’s still there, and has been all along.
In the text accompanying the handwritten statement, Sabine says:
Instead of the ‘witness statements’ that I had put here in April 2015 whilst in exile in Germany, I am now putting the text that I wrote in the middle of the night at Holborn Police station.
Our suspicion is that Sabine intends to use the fact that she fled justice in the UK, and was residing in Germany at the time she posted the witness statements, as her defence against the charges facing her: crimes that are committed while the defendant is out of the country are not able to be prosecuted once the person returns home.
However, she has had the illegality of the witness statements drawn to her attention multiple times since her return last August, and until now, has chosen to leave them standing. This leads us to suspect that her legal team has had a stern word with her.
Let us hope that in preparing for the case against Sabine, the CPS has also gathered up the reams of harassing and defamatory material she has published, both before her flight from justice and following her return.
EC – I would hate to see McNeil escape the might of the wheels of justice, which I am certain she may well try to do.
Is discussing her case on a public blog pretrial, possibly going to give her the very excuse she needs to try to escape prosecution?
Just a thought – I for one would hate to see her escape on a technicality (the article below was written in 2009 – the law may have changed?
LikeLiked by 1 person
It might be a good idea to hold fire until we know what the results are on the 8th. Maybe one of legal minds can clarify.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for this, JW.
It’s important to note that the handwritten letter we published here was taken directly from Sabine’s ‘Whistleblower Kids’ blog, where it appeared today. As far as we’re aware, this material is in the public domain, accessible by anyone who wishes to view it.
However, we take your point that in the strict journalistic sense it is in fact illegal to report details that might be prejudicial to a case, so we’ll stop until we know the results of the hearing on 8 April.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good idea. I will be doing the same on my own blog.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Really good to have these clarifications on the law. Yes, all posters need to be careful (especially those based in UK) of what they write about this trial. I think once both Neelu and Sabine enters their plea on 8th April 2016 then this is when the risk of undermining a trial by writing about it becomes possible. I personally would advise people not to write about it after 8th April. The Satan Hunters will be working hard to use any technicality to avoid a full trial. On 8th April I believe Neelu will enter arguments to void the court proceedings against her.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s correct, SV. It’s my understanding that the trial itself, its date, its location, and the charges may be referred to, but that’s it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Inchambers@ thoughts and opinion would be a God send
LikeLike
I’m not a lawyer – merely a glorified clerk who wrangles IP forms.
I apologise for my eleventh hour appeareance, I’ve had a busy day. – It probably IS wise not to discuss the case itself while it’s ‘active. However there should be few concerns with exploring the day’s events as they unfold in the public arena. The biggest danger would be being seen as mounting a campaign to influence proceedings. But I suspect THAT charge is one that is more likely to be levelled at Sabine. The fact that people have noticed it and are talking about it is unlikely to work in her favour.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, inchambers@–this was more or less my thinking as well. I do think it will be wise to refrain from speculating on the case until it’s settled, but there’s nothing wrong with reporting on events as they occur.
LikeLike
I would hate Sabine to be able to try to argue that this blog has tried to mount an organised campaign to influence proceedings. Its worth reading APD comments with regards the 8th April – perhaps the dots line up and APD has let the cat out of the bag?
LikeLike
Which of Angie’s comments are you referring to, JW?
LikeLike
From what Karen sent earlier today:
LikeLiked by 2 people
Okay, thanks. I’ll check on this.
LikeLike
If Angie does indeed have a file of threats against her then they won’t be from any of us. Plus she does have a propensity to exaggerate a lot.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Very true. We never threaten, and we back up our allegations with actual evidence. Far more than any of the Hoaxtead lot do.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Any alleged threats to Power-Disney would have no bearing on another case & could not be introduced as evidence. Plus of course she has to put her foot in it by falsely accusing RD. An idle threat from her.
LikeLike
This has just been sent to me by Agent Y. Christ, how many fundraising websites does one woman need?
LikeLiked by 2 people
Can’t have too many–every penny counts!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Am I missing something here??
How on earth can she make a statement “I closed the blog ‘Whistleblower Kids’ a few days ago”
…and put it on the blog ‘Whistleblower Kids’???
LikeLiked by 2 people
I think a part of Sabine’s brain is missing.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, it’s probably one of the most ludicrous sentences I’ve ever read. Reading it on a blog which isn’t there…lol
LikeLiked by 2 people
I think she meant that she closed it a few days before 11 January…but that’s not true either.
LikeLike
Yes, I agree.
LikeLike
“This bus is coming to town.”
LMFAO! XD
LikeLiked by 2 people
…and I’m sure her deceased sister would be thrilled that Angie would use her inheritance to bring someone over from the US to perpetuate a hoax. So sad.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It really is.
LikeLike
6:56 – ANGIE ADMITS TO REGULARLY BEATING HER CHILDREN WITH A STICK
“The Bible says spare the rod and spoil the child and I actually used to use a stick on my children, like a kind of T-bar for technical drawing. I used to give them that about every 3-6 months, if they were really outrageous.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
13:21 – Angie says she’s just inherited £20,000 from her sister and that she’s going to put it all into her GoFundMe account!
LikeLike
20:24 – We all get a mention. Good work, guys 🙂
LikeLike
22:06 – “There’s a possibility I could be arrested in the next week or two…”
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh please…..oh please……
LikeLike
That is just sickening.
The Bible also says to stone adulterers to death–has Angie done that too?
LikeLike
I hate to say this, EC, but I genuinely think that given the opportunity, she’s the kind of person who would!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Here’s one she has ignored:
You shall not spread a false report. You shall not join hands with a wicked man to be a malicious witness. You shall not fall in with the many to do evil, nor shall you bear witness in a lawsuit, siding with the many, so as to pervert justice …
— Exodus 23:1-2[8]
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nice one, FS!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Towards the end of the video, she says she was given the freedom of the city of St. Charles, Louisiana. St. Charles is not a city 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Shaking my head. She just opens her mouth and the lies spew forth, don’t they?
LikeLike
She actually said Lake Charles, Louisiana Lake which is the fifth-largest incorporated city in Louisiana..had to Google that!
LikeLike
I put that extra “lake” after Louisiana by mistake..lol
LikeLike
LOL @ the husband coming in at 16:40 and taking the piss out of Angie while she’s crying XD
LikeLiked by 1 person
Angie: “Why would someone call you a liar when you’re telling the truth?”
Wow, she has something in common with RD, does she ever think that?
LikeLiked by 1 person
…And all the Hampstead parents, teachers, parents, social workers, police officers, clergy…And Mrs. Justice Pauffley…And all of us…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Think she’s pissed here.
She really pronounces her R’s very funny.
She’s a f…..g nuttah!
Anyway on a good note, if she’s spent the donation money then the £20k can be used for the Orphanage.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Haha, I was thinking exactly the same 🙂
By the way, did you catch the bit where she describes us as not everyday trolls and says that we’re really well trained and organised? What a lovely compliment! Thanks, Ange, if you’re reading this (which, let’s face it, you are).
LikeLiked by 1 person
..and we’re not “little minion trolls” either! **puffs chest out** 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
I never realized I was so important!
LikeLiked by 1 person
FS, don’t be so modest – you’re a leading light of the hoaxbuster set!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Heh, that’s so sweet of her. Now, if only someone would pay me!
LikeLike
Is it me or is she going into a very broad west country accent?
LikeLike
Is it me or is she going into a very broad west country accent? She is definately more RP in the videos where she talks to Rupert.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sorry for the double post – either my internet connection or WordPress is having a wobble.
LikeLike
WordPress does that sort of thing. Also from time to time it tells me I’m posting comments too quickly, whatever that’s supposed to mean.
LikeLike
I think the pronunciation of her “R’s” could be something she’s perhaps picked up living in Ireland.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think it’s very suspicious that these two have never been seen in the same room at the same time.
LikeLiked by 1 person
LikeLike
Pingback: Hoaxtead e-book libels, violates court order | HOAXTEAD RESEARCH