What part of ‘Stop talking about Hoaxtead’ does Sabine not get?

Has it really been more than a year since Mrs Justice Pauffley signed that court order telling Sabine and Ella to stop spreading lies about Hoaxtead, or face the legal consequences?

That order was made on 15 February, 2015…and has really cut back on the number of illegal posts, videos, and comments about the school, the church, the children, the alleged cult, and RD.

Haha, just kidding. No, it hasn’t.

So we weren’t even a tiny bit surprised to find Sabine’s latest blog post was chock-full of links to posts about the Hampstead hoax. Apparently someone on Twitter alerted her to Chris Everard’s giant steaming pile of…er, links. And Sabine, of course, was all over that:

Sabine-1 2016-02-29Just to drive home the point, she has to add a bunch of self-indulgent blather about what a hero she is to ‘oppose deception’, and how a report titled ‘Satanist Ritual Abuse of Children’ (written by an SRA-promoter on behalf of an evangelical Christian group that thinks Satan really does walk among us) advocates (gasp!) a ‘thorough re-consideration of court cases, police and legal procedures’.

Naming no names, right Sabine? Nudge, nudge.

Sabine-2 2016-02-29

She just cannot resist a little snivelling self-pity along the way, though, pointing out that the CPS and police ‘conspire and collude’ to put poor innocent German whistleblowers with gimpy hips behind bars when they ought to be out looking for those pesky baby-eating Satanists!

We almost haven’t the heart to tell her that the police and CPS have other jobs too, like keeping dangerous lunatics from leading campaigns of harassment against innocent citizens, or intimidating witnesses by publishing their statements online. You know, minor little things.

She did manage not to mention the word ‘Hampstead’ in the extract above, but this is Sabine’s blog, so of course there’s this lovely line-up of links in the sidebar:Sabine-4 2016-02-29

Sabine-3 2016-02-29

No, Officer, no Hampstead posts here! Honest!

Really, we have trouble understanding how a woman who claims to have invented theories to rival Einstein’s (we are not kidding, she really did say this) cannot  understand a simple directive: stop talking about the Hampstead hoax, already!

It’s not as if she doesn’t understand the consequences, either. How many times has she been arrested over the past few months? Does this not indicate that perhaps she might want to reconsider her actions, if only to keep herself out of prison?

Sabine arrest

 

27 thoughts on “What part of ‘Stop talking about Hoaxtead’ does Sabine not get?

  1. This is the ideal opportunity for a Hampstead resident – it only needs one- to get Sabine McNeil back into court over her flagrant breaches of a High Court order that forbids her internet campaign and points out the penalties.

    They would also get legal aid to do so.

    Liked by 2 people

  2. Also note on Sabine’s Whistleblower website where she publishes a blatant lie which I have been following elsewhere. She and others claim a letter from the Catholic Church in Melbourne Australia admits there were Satanic murders of children – she publishes the letter. It says no such thing- it refers to claims of abuse. There is no mention of Satanism or babies.

    The recipient of the letter has made the claims about Satanism without a scintilla of proof and also falsely claims the letter confirms his claims. Such liars- these are wicked people who jump on the bandwagon of genuine historic child abuse to perpetuate their own bullshit and help create chaos.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Does Sabine McNeill have a working brain anymore? Going to jail for a cause is worthy only if there is something to fight for, but she must be aware that Hampstead is a fantasy, and all that information such as the letter contains no evidence of SRA, yet she is determined to destroy herself for nothing.

      Liked by 1 person

      • I can never work out what is really going on in her head. Given her employment history, even if there was some serious embroidering on her CV, you would imagine she would be too bright to really believe in Satanic baby murderers taking over a Primary School every Wednesday. She seems to have a masochistic need to be a martyr to her cause. Maybe she has agreed this with Belinda as a stratergy to gain publicity.

        You can see Belinda making a YouTube appeal: “Help me free the poor crippled old woman imprisoned by cruel UK authorities – donate now, Paypal and Credit cards accepted. Hurry, I need to pay off my mortgage.”

        Liked by 2 people

        • Ironically I think of Jesus when I think of Sabine McNeill – weird I know, but Jesus seemed totally determined to get himself nailed to a cross despite opportunities to avoid that fate. Sabine McNeill seems strangely determined towards a fate of becoming nailed to her own metaphorical cross. There is something in her brain that is erasing all reason, all inhibition and all efforts to limit her, to destroy herself. It seems like she is determined to get herself time in jail.

          Liked by 1 person

  3. I think its worth reminding ourselves of the Judgement published by the Justice Ministry. It makes very clear the Judges findings.

    Its beyond debate, irrespective of what Sabine tries to push forward.

    Sabines efforts would be more constructive if she choose to pursue a belief that the earth is flat, or its supported on the back of a huge intergalactic elephant.

    The Judgment

    https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/gareeva-dearman-2015.pdf

    Liked by 1 person

    • Yes, the judgement continues to hold up to scrutiny, and reading it a year after the fact, some of the bits that were a bit obscure at the time really fall into place.

      Like

  4. Part of the judgment

    16. I am able to state with complete conviction that none of the allegations are true. I am
    entirely certain that everything Ms Draper, her partner Abraham Christie and the
    children said about those matters was fabricated. The claims are baseless. Those who
    have sought to perpetuate them are evil and / or foolish.

    48. The oral evidence began on 17 February. At 08.51 that day, my clerk received an
    email from Ms Draper in which she asked permission for her McKenzie friend,
    Belinda McKenzie to represent her and her parents’ interests in court. Ms Draper
    stated that she had been “prevented from being present in the court” and that Ms
    McKenzie had her “formal instruction to convey (her) position.” Ms McKenzie
    reiterated that request at the beginning of the hearing. But, as I explained to Ms
    McKenzie, in circumstances where the mother herself was absent, the Practice
    Guidance relating to McKenzie Friends expressly prohibits such an individual from
    acting as the litigant’s agent or from conducting the litigation on her behalf. In Ms
    Draper’s absence, it seemed to me that there was no proper role for Ms McKenzie.

    57. Within her position statement for 26 January hearing, written for her by Ms Sabine
    McNeill as she later revealed, the mother made a thinly veiled threat as to what would
    happen if the children “were not returned to their mother and grandparents with
    immediate effect.” Ms Draper stated that the consequence would be “high level
    embarrassment.” An open letter to Theresa May, the Home Secretary, posted on the
    internet, explicitly states that the Position Statement was “our offer NOT to expose
    this scandal in exchange for returning the children.”

    81. Mr Christie then explains to Jean Clement Yaohirou in the presence of the children
    what this is all about. He says, “… you don’t understand what I’m telling you? They
    are killing babies wholesale, wholesale. They are killing them, they are drinking the
    blood and they are eating meat, and the skulls of the babies they are tying them, four
    skulls here …., one here, two here, elbows here. And they are making, what about the
    shoes, this baby – ” One of the children says, “Yeah, skin, baby skin shoes.” Mr
    Christie asks “Who makes the baby skin shoes?” A man’s name is given, and in
    response to the question as to whether he is a shoemaker, the child answers that he is.

    165. This is a summary of my salient findings –
     Neither child has been sexually abused by any of the following – Ricky Dearman,
    teachers at Christchurch Primary School Hampstead, the parents of students at that
    school, the priest at the adjacent church, teachers at any of the Hampstead or Highgate
    schools, members of the Metropolitan Police, social workers employed by the London
    Borough of Camden, officers of Cafcass or anyone else mentioned by Ms Draper or
    Mr Christie.
     The children’s half brother, his father and stepmother – Will and Sarah Draper – are
    likewise exonerated of any illicit or abusive acts involving the children.
     There was no satanic or other cult at which babies were murdered and children were
    sexually abused.
     All of the material promulgated by Ms Draper now published on the internet is
    nothing other than utter nonsense.
     The children’s false stories came about as the result of relentless emotional and
    psychological pressure as well as significant physical abuse. Torture is the most
    accurate way to describe what was done by Mr Christie in collaboration with Ms
    Draper.
     Both children were assaulted by Mr Christie by being hit with a metal spoon on
    multiple occasions over their head and legs, by being pushed into walls, punched,
    pinched and kicked. Water was poured over them as they knelt semi-clothed.
     The long term emotional and psychological harm of what was done to the children is
    incalculable. The impact of the internet campaign is likely to have the most
    devastating consequences for P and Q.

    Liked by 2 people

  5. What you all fail to understand is Sabine is far superior to us all. She has her solution, all she needs are the problems/evidence to support that solution. Nothing is going to get in the way because she can not be wrong.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. Sabine and Ella knowingly conspired to illegally upload the children’s videos and the names and contact details of the innocent people they’d accused (and their children). Sabine has become very adept at denying this but she is lying.She, Ella and others have let slip on more than one occasion what they did. The dumb pair of bints even announced beforehand that they were going to do it, for Christ’s sake!

    Here’s a snippet of the supporting evidence:

    https://hoaxteadresearch.wordpress.com/2015/08/23/ellas-damning-email-yet-more-evidence-that-sabine-did-leak-those-videos-and-documents

    https://hoaxteadresearch.wordpress.com/2015/08/09/araya-implicates-both-herself-and-ella-in-info-leaks

    https://hoaxteadresearch.wordpress.com/2015/08/06/yet-more-proof-that-sabine-and-ella-did-leak-those-names-and-addresses

    https://hoaxteadresearch.wordpress.com/2015/07/01/abe-sabine-and-ella-cannot-wriggle-out-of-their-crimes

    Liked by 2 people

  7. Two links that might be of interest.
    1. is that the discredited Association of McKenzie Friends have published their response to the McKenzie Friend Government consultation.
    http://victims-unite.net/2016/02/27/mojgovuk-victims-mckenziefriends-and-litigantsinperson-unite-consultation-re-courts-approach-to-lay-legal-help-and-advocacy/

    2. Another major event is planned by Sabine McNeill/Belinda McKenzie and co on 21 March 2016 – an event which undercover police might wish to attend since the possibility is high that a bail breach will happen.
    http://aspects.duckdns.org/We-Accuse/20160321_index_We-Accuse_event.htm

    Liked by 1 person

  8. Sabine is not very bright.

    If you click on the link in the title (the intineri for the meeting) a document is downloaded, embedded in the property are two names – author Sabine Mcneil, last edited by Belinda Mckenzie

    http://aspects.duckdns.org/We-Accuse/20160321_index_We-Accuse_event.htm

    No doubt that bail conditions will be breached, pushed on by Belinda of course who is not on bail.

    I wonder if London’s Theatro Technis know that they are aiding a potential criminal act.

    From the link you get taken to many of Sabines self promotion sites

    From that site:

    “About
    An Association of McKenzie Friends became necessary on a number of occasions that resulted in frustration and similar unpleasant feelings, especially when helping Litigants in Person who are in prison – on remand, i.e. unconvicted:

    After having been allowed ‘legal visits’ in HMP Holloway twice, one McKenzie Friend was ‘downgraded’ to social visits, i.e. no papers could be taken in by either the inmate or the McKenzie Friend
    this made it impossible to prepare the response to an Order, let alone an appeal in time
    McKenzie Friends were not allowed to speak to the prisoners who were waiting in the court cells
    instead, they were given 20 minutes by a judge during a family court hearing.
    Our Aims and Objectives are therefore:

    to raise awareness of the value that McKenzie Friends bring to Litigants in Person – as an alternative to lawyers
    to play the role of advocacy on behalf of victims of white collar crimes and child snatching
    to lobby those responsible for making change possible
    to publish relevant findings and experiences in the public interest.
    Our immediate campaigning goals are:

    allow McKenzie Friends the rights for legal visits in prisons
    allow McKenzie Friends to instruct barristers
    the recognition of ‘public interest advocacy’, when McKenzie Friends present their observations in courts or represent cases at meetings with MPs and MEPs”

    ……………………………………………………………………………………………….

    So she expects the same rights as someone who studied law and is bound by a code of ethics.

    Lets go and let the landlady of a convicted spy have unfettered access to prisons. (For anyone in doubt thats About BELINDA

    Here is another post (from http://network-of-those-abused-by-church.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/live-in-landlady-refuses-me-receipt-for.html):

    Thursday, April 26, 2012

    Live-in landlady refuses me receipt for £1000 in rent paid

    This morning our live-in landlady, human rights activist Belinda McKenzie, refused me a receipt for the £1,000 I paid her in rent for the last month. She then emailed me, stating: “Regarding the payment of rent due today, I will receive the money in the usual way and give you a receipt as soon as you acknowledge receipt of the Possession Notice this morning.” So Declan has emailed Belinda’s solicitors, Messrs Kidd Rapinet, to have what was my payment of rent acknowledged in accordance with the law (see blog of 20 April Declan reports Kidd Rapinet to the Solicitors Regulation Authority):
    Click to enlarge

    Belinda has had to withdraw her claim for the accelerated possession of our flat due to the “wrong information” she provided the Court, to quote herself. But her stance this morning baffles me. As I said in the previous blog We lose all access to the internet, Belinda recently started up a group called the Association of McKenzie Friends – a McKenzie friend is a lay legal advisor assisting litigants in person. The Association is necessary, they say, “because too many victims of white collar crimes encountered too many problems and their helpers and supporters as well”.

    First meeting of the Association of McKenzie Friends, Westminster, with John Hemming MP for Birmingham, featuring Belinda McKenzie and Sabine McNeill.

    MI5 whistleblower David Shayler lived in one of the rooms below us for a couple of years, until 2007. Regarding Shayler, this is what we told the Court last week in our defence to Possession Order (see Additional Information, para. 4):
    The defendants refute the claimant’s statement that she explained to them that their tenancy was never meant to be a long-term arrangement as she would need the accommodation back for her family at some point. The following email evidence is by no means exhaustive (copy of emails available to the Court upon request). On 24 July 2009, the claimant emailed an associate of the defendants in America stating that former MI5 whistleblower David Shayler lived in the house for a couple of years until 2007 (it is unfortunate that Mr Shayler then declared that he was the Messiah, became a squatter, and was subsequently ridiculed in the press for changing his name to Delores Kane), adding that her house could be an “in-house charity” for impoverished activists supported by “some kind of international fund”. On 18 September 2011, the claimant wrote that the defendants “could have stayed here indefinitely” if they “hadn’t been so generally stand-offish”. The Note to the Court goes on to state that the claimant needs the defendants’ flat for her family, but she has repeatedly stated in email correspondence that she wanted the flat for a homeless couple who were expecting a baby.

    Like

Comments are closed.