Do you remember the BP Deepwater Horizon disaster in the Gulf of Mexico a few summers ago? The one where the oil rig exploded, and massive amounts of crude oil billowed into the ocean waters for days…then weeks…then months? It just. Would. Not. Be. Stopped.
Well, Drifloud’s cranial eruption, which began with an explosion, is now threatening to go on and on, ad infinitum, possibly becoming the world’s longest-running temper tantrum.
Yes, after Monday’s extended rant at the Twitter CEO, he’s sent another email to Jack Dorsey (and copied in every citizen in the UK—if you didn’t receive one, check your spam inbox).
To Jack Dorsey, CEO Twitter.
I am sending you this email again as I have not yet received a reply, or even an acknowledgement from you.
This is a VERY SERIOUS matter and is about revealing to the public the systematic rape, torture and murder of children by people in the British school system, local authorities and police. These crimes are being covered up by the British government using the intelligence services, the Metropolitan police, members of the judiciary as well as the UK media.
I, and many others, are determined to expose these crimes.
Nameless Twitter employees have bowed to pressure from those determined to keep these crimes/criminals hiden, and have suspended my account, thereby aiding and abetting these crimes/criminals, and helping to prevent the public from realising what is going on. I have been falsely and slanderously accused of “participating in targeted abuse”. This is an utter, despicable LIE and it is also a criminal offence, namely, slander.
I insist that you, Jack Dorsey, as CEO of Twitter, and representative of all Twitter employees, make a FULL and UNRESERVED apology.
Failure to do so by 29th February, 2016 will be taken as acceptance that you are, in deed, guilty of slander against the conscious living being known as Drifloud.
NOTE: The above statement and demand of redress from you, the living human being known as Jack Dorsey, is NOT and CANNOT BE, a matter of LEGAL or CORPORATE “Law”; this is SOLELY a LAWFUL matter between living beings.
I hold only to that which is lawful, and do not consent to the transmutation of any living beings mentioned in the above statement (including myself) to that of “legal person” status, or to any legal interpretation of my words whatsoever. All words and combinations of words used in the above statement carry solely the meaning I intend them to convey, which is to tell the truth to the best of my ability in order to report the crimes detailed above and to bring about an end to the brutalisation, torture, rape and murder of innocents – as I know such things to be contrary to the laws of humanity.
from a conscious living being,
Drifloud February 3rd 2016
Hello? We have a few questions:
- If calling Drippy out for “participating in targeted abuse” (which he totally was, by the way) is a “criminal offence, namely, slander”, what’s with all that gibberish at the bottom about how there’s no such thing as legalities, but only the laws of humanity?
- How come Drippy gets to call himself a conscious living being, while poor Jack is relegated to the status of living human being? This hardly seems fair.
- What will happen on 29th February, exactly? Will the Conscious Drippy One finally shut up? Will he cast a curse on Twitter? Enquiring minds want to know!
- Are there enough antipsychotic medications in the entire galaxy to bring Drippy back down to earth?
- If there were, would we want him here?
Drippy’s temper tantrum has been carrying on unabated since 30 January, which seems ambitious, even for a screaming toddler. We’re not sure there’s a dummy big enough to plug this one, folks, so prepare yourselves for a long ride.
Not to mention a whole barrel full of mixed metaphors.