Abe obsesses some more about that child porn thing

Hands up, everyone here who remembers that post where we presented evidence that the police had indeed found commercial child sexual abuse images on Abe’s phone.

It was a while ago, so let us refresh your memories.

First, there was speculation that something untoward might have been found.

Pookster78 v Ponpon 2015-09-15Then, things got a bit more specific, as it turns out that Abe and Ella’s bestie, Araya Soma, had blabbed about the pesky child porn find:

Abraham's phone-porn-via Araya…and that was backed up by Abe’s own YouTube sock, ‘Dicky Rearman’:

Abe as 'Dicky Rearman' on child porn…which brings us to Friday evening’s post on Abe’s blog:

Abe porn on phone self-incriminationWell then.

Abe really does seem determined to show beyond a doubt that whoever it was who put the porn on his phone, it wasn’t him, no sirree! And when we say ‘determined’, we mean ‘really, really, really determined!’

It was those pesky kids! No, it was the evil Dearman!

No, it was the Great Panjandrum, with a little round button at top!

But not Abe. Nope.

Because little Aby doesn’t have a conscience, so how could he be feeling guilty?

i-didnt-do-it-bart-simpson

24 thoughts on “Abe obsesses some more about that child porn thing

    • They’re everywhere. Can’t leave anything lying around, next thing you know the porn fairies have grabbed it up and are planting false evidence all over it! Shocking.

      Like

    • Babs, I do agree with you, and if you’ll check the ‘tags’ for this article you’ll see that I used the correct term there. ‘Commercial child sex abuse images’ is used by law enforcement to reinforce the idea that each image is an incident of child sex abuse in itself, and we fully understand that.

      However, to most non-professionals, ‘child porn’ is the more familiar term, so I’ve used it in the body of the text. Using both terms–one in the text, one in the tags–ensures that it will be more ‘searchable’ online, and thus will get the message out to the widest audience possible.

      Like

    • He’s thrown several kitchens worth of stuff at RD, and seems to think that RD clings to his every word. In fact, we have seen no evidence that Ricky gives a rat’s arse what Abe thinks, let alone what spews out of his foul little mouth.

      Like

  1. Pingback: Abe obsesses some more about that child porn thing | Sheva's Cross of Change Blog

  2. And here is dulled tape of child explaining that the phone just got lost down the back of the sofa, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UVyvhXjIS-U

    It was not nicked, therefore that whole story about it getting into the hands of RD for him to ‘plant’ any kind of pornography on it is nonsense. I believe the children.

    Abe fails to answer proper challenges about his story or to elaborate on any details when asked. His MO is to just plaster garbage on his pages in deflection attempts, to redirect attention when it gets a bit sticky, when people get near to the real nub of the issue. I bet Abe used to claim: ‘you planted it on me, gov’ when the police discovered drugs on him, and so this is his learnt, default, defence position.

    Sam is right about everything but the kitchen sink being thrown at RD except I would add: ‘and then some’. Really, this man has had to put up with a lot. I wonder if AC ever feels a tiny bit guilty.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Good point about Abe claiming that the evidence was probably planted on him whenever he was arrested (which apparently was practically an everyday occurrence in his life)–it’d be almost a reflex response by now, wouldn’t it?

      Like

  3. Abraham Christie needs to come back to Britain and face up to the various allegations against him, everybody will suspect he has something to hide whilst he continues to be a fugitive abroad. Lets have a police investigation, and if necessary a court case so Abraham Christie can show to the world he is innocent of being a child abuser and paedophile.

    Liked by 2 people

  4. Dear Mr El,

    Frances was following along quite nicely in the above post, right up to the point where Abe talks about a ‘dildo hat’.
    Frances has to ask: is this a new, de rigueur fashion item of which she is unaware? Frances realises she has been living in darkness for quite some time, but she does fancy herself up-to-date with fashion.
    She knows about polyester doubleknits, safari suits, mini-skirts and yes, even the bikini.
    But dildo hats? She has never heard of these before.
    This lack in her sartorial knowledge is something Frances shall quietly contemplate today.
    Perhaps a sketch, lithograph, or as young people say, a ‘pic’ would be helpful here?
    Thank you.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Dear Miss Angie’s,

      Your explanation goes some way to clarifying the subject.
      Still, Frances fears she will have to go to the ‘street’ to find out what this hat really looks like.
      Knowledge, as Frances’ dear, dear mother used to say, is a many splendoured thing.

      Liked by 1 person

    • It takes more than that to offend Frances. She sent me a letter this morning, informing me she was off to a spa to have her scales seen to. Apparently it’s a yearly thing for reptiles. I had no idea. But she assured me she’d be back, scrubbed fresh and smooth(er) and rarin’ to go. Or words to that effect.

      Like

Comments are closed.