ACTION: Boycott Hamster Research

/ 16/10/2015

Thanks to one of our commenters for this idea:

FS-Boycott blogs-2015-10-15No, we don’t want you to boycott the Conservapedia site. Unless you want to, that is. Totally up to you.

But today we noticed, at the tail end of one of Charlotte Ward Alton’s posts in which she details in loving, almost drooling ecstasy, the horrible sexual degradations she believes Ella’s children suffered (seriously, don’t read it; we did, and now regret it), the following comment:

Hampstead Research 2015-10-15Charlotte claims that her support and readership are up (and with her x-ray vision, she’s somehow able to discern that Abe & Ella’s pig’s toilet of a blog is also getting lots of traffic).

And it occurred to us: we’ve long known that a large chunk of Charlotte’s readership comes from anti-hoax activists who want to see the truth come out about this entire ridiculous business. We know that many of you go there for the same reason we do: to point and laugh.

So what would happen if we All. Just. Stopped.

On this blog, we reach an average of 1,000 to 1,200 viewers per day. If even 50% of us simply stopped giving Charlotte’s blog any oxygen, she’d have less reason to keep churning out her vicious lies and attacks. If we all stopped, she might just pull down the blog.

So how about it?

Are you willing to give it a try? We have nothing to lose but Charlotte…and really, she’s no loss at all. Boycott Hampstead Research

Related posts

39 thoughts on “ACTION: Boycott Hamster Research”

      • Exactly. But at this point, she has nothing to offer: no one else who’s close to the case will speak to her (except Neelu and Angie, neither of whom have much to say other than ‘rah, rah, go Charlotte!’).

        Like

  3. She is not in contact with anyone involved in the case, bar Neely, therefore she has no news of interest to us.

    I did derive some jaw dropping entertainment from Charlotte’s stupidity and thick skin, the blindness to her own shortcomings, made all the more ridiculous given the backdrop of her attempts to sound like an intellectual, (but failing) on the back of her co-published ‘academic paper’ (read: manipulation of David Voas), but that all ended last night.

    I realised the error of my ways, and received punishment for my gloating.

    Whilst reading her ‘work’, in amazement, I would simultaneously entertain myself with theories that this effort was actually the work of a team of agents who deliberately write to shock (and get a reaction), and so keep the story alive. My pet theory being that the Hampstead Case will serve as a precedent, an illustration of the necessity for new laws around internet censorship and (instant) government control of web content. Yes, sorry, I couldn’t help myself, I wondered if could be an agency having some fun whilst running an operation. But I always knew this could be paranoia, and the very thing that has gone into freefall with the ‘other side’. Applying Occam’s razor, and, following the ‘why didn’t Ella notice anal bleeding’ post, I concede, that no, it’s most likely just a sick woman. An out and out paedophile, no less.

    There have been indications of Charlotte Ward’s paedophilia. Her particular preference involves fantasies of sadistic, satanic child abuse. Like most paedophiles, I now realise, she hides her interest and activities. Disguised, seeming to have a legitimate reason to ‘investigate’ (read: peruse) content involving the abuse of children.

    Pretending to be caring of the very people they abuse, these people are duplicitous individuals, and destroy any trust in genuine carers. The consequence of this cannot be underestimated. In addition to the trauma, all our children are now captives, no longer free, and we are all in a state of constant fear. Our innocence has vanished. There is no safety, who can we trust?

    Charlotte Ward had already published child abuse images, admitted to ‘researching’ them, but, as a woman, I still find it hard to believe women, rather than men, can be sexually stimulated by abusing children. I half excused it as another vain attempt to smear RD, some hidden hatred of some other man, or men, that she was playing out, unconsciously. Then she went a step further and published URLs of child porn sites, inviting others to visit, trying to dilute her own shame by getting others to join her.

    But now it has become crystal clear that I was wrong. The extract she published, describing in intricate detail the specifics in the abuse of babies was nothing short of abuse in itself: of the reader. Me. Because I cannot shake, forget, what was child porn to the nth level in disguise. I am disgusted, sickened. I will never visit that site again.

    I hope Charlotte Ward gets sick and has no health insurance in Suriname and falls on hard times. Ordinarily she could come back to the UK and the NHS would care for her. But now she won’t be able to live out her last days in an old folks home, should she need to. Because the police are waiting for her and have enough evidence to put her in jail for harassment alone. So she won’t have that option.

    I comfort myself with this thought.

    Resist the urge to read that extract. You will regret it. It’s that bad.

    Liked by 1 person

    • She tries to ‘dilute her own shame by getting others to join her’–brilliant, Susan. Yes.
      Yesterday when I read that piece, I was sickened by it, by her; so when I saw Fairly Sane’s very sane suggestion of a boycott, it suddenly made perfect sense.

      Like

  5. Is she really that dumb? If this surge of viewers which she talks about were supporters then there would be many comments of support on her blog. All I see is tumbleweed blowing through it..

    Liked by 1 person

    • Exactly. Very few people comment positively there, and all the rest she must delete. If she allowed them to stand, it would be clear that she’s very much isolated in her own filth.

      Like

      • Yeah, exactly the same as Abraham’s sorry state of a “blog”.

        All he does is delete, delete, delete..and always leaves the ONE message of support he has from one outsider (which methinks was probably him anyway!)

        Let’s face it, looking at both Charlotte’s blog and Abe & Ella’s blog.. their game is virtually over! haha!!

        Liked by 1 person

  6. Why on earth would you go there unless you were on the opposite side, to keep a check on her?

    What does Hampstead Research really offer?

    1) Titillation for like minded paedophiles – is this how Jacco and Charlotte came together?

    2) Fraud research

    3) Re-posting of links with no added value

    Like

  7. I’ve made a point of not visiting her site for a while now, plus i know that i could always catch up with her latest shenanigans here where we can all point and laugh at her without providing her blog with more hits.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Exactly, AF. We do receive reports from one person who acts as our ‘designated hitter’ and goes there to collect anything of interest. But there’s less and less.

      Like

  9. Happy to boycott but then you may miss items of interest such as the proposed meeting against ‘forced adoptions’ in London on the 5th of November, starring, Sabine, Belinda and that legal genius Deborah Mahmoudieh. All in one place. And it’s bonfire night.

    Liked by 1 person

  11. I’m having difficulty viewing Hamster Reacharse anyway. 9 times out of 10, I just get an error message. Is it just me? I’d say it’s my browser but I’m not having any difficulties with any other site.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Incidentally, I’m not buying Charlotte’s crap about all those people she reckons she’s been emailing. She wouldn’t have access to all those addresses. We’re talking about a woman who believes that messages from dead people are real. I hardly think she’d have the technical nouse to find and collate so many private email addresses.

      Liked by 1 person

  14. And other news is, Abraham is writing about hemp again, and he’s deleted “Reti” Popoola’s abstract.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Oh, interesting. I wonder whether Popoola asked him to? I got the distinct impression that he was nervous about having been identified.

      Like

  15. ‘Reti’ must have asked for the removal of the paper.

    I see someone is giving Abe a bit of a mental workout on biochemical matters. But Abe is not up to such technical discussions, so he will just do his usual and run away when the going gets tough. He is not a professional, his knowledge is very superficial, and irrelevant to the blog title and purpose. What does hemp have to do with anything?

    Liked by 1 person

  17. Pingback: Did Charlotte jump or was she pushed? | HOAXTEAD RESEARCH

  18. Pingback: ACTION: Let’s take away Abe’s power | HOAXTEAD RESEARCH

Comments are closed.