One of the great ‘pieces of evidence’ trotted out by Hoaxteaders as ‘proof’ that hundreds of ordinary citizens in Hampstead are actually members of a deadly ‘Satanic’ baby-murdering, child-raping, cannibalistic cult is that not a single one of the ‘accused’ has stepped forward to have his or her bottom examined for ‘Satanic’ tattoos.
Setting aside the fact that there are, in fact, no accused, other than a bunch of names written down by Ella and Abe…and the fact that we live in a democracy, where the rule of law includes the very important principle of ‘innocent until proven guilty’, the ‘tattoo/birthmark’ argument sounds eerily like the medieval concept of ‘witch’s marks‘.
Mark Trellis, who’s been doing yeoman’s duty on YouTube as he attempts to battle Hoaxteaders with logic, takes the tattoo argument apart very neatly. He posted this very eloquent response on one of Guidance2222’s videos: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fKFt8V7S-0E
So, to the alleged tattoos: How do you KNOW that the accused did not immediately run to their doctors? And then, from there, to the police? And what would the police have done with this ‘non-evidence’? They would not have been able to communicate this to the public in any way, shape, or form, as they are not allowed to. Additionally, there are gagging orders/secrecy requirements in such family court cases. The police would have advised these people NOT to publicise any aspect of themselves, they would have told them to ignore everything and to avoid all social media, etc. So these presumably (innocent till proven guilty?) people would follow such advice. This does not mean that they might not want to challenge such ridiculous calls (for exposure of the tattoos, etc.).
But they are f*cked whether they comply with the witch-hunters’ demands or not. If they do, their evidence will just be labelled a cover-up, biased. I am sure it would be said, for example, that a cult doctor made a false statement, etc. Where would it end? Do you REALLY think this would satisfy anyone? The witch-finders would claim that stand-ins had been used—any theory to revert to their original position. WHERE WOULD IT END?
Some time ago (maybe still) Araya Soma called for the accused to
“Come forward to be examined, if you are not guilty you should have come forward STRAIGHT away to be examined, you havent (sic), so we find that as this is weird that you havent (sic), we assume you are guilty, so we DEMAND that you be examined by trusted doctors who could see any attempts to cover up those marks up (sic), plus trusted police that wish to be present. We want photos taken to be kept by the police and doctors for reference in court https://wwww.youtube.com/watch?v=mMJo67g2jeo
But when Araya was challenged by Pookster78 to name the doctors, she shied away: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wv71KUJE2eY ‘I am not giving details of the doctors, u lunatic’, etc.
Yet Araya and people like you demand those same accused, whose lives have been turned upside down and are probably suffering from major anxiety, perhaps are expecting a firebomb to come through the letterbox at any moment, should be trusting enough to turn up at a venue, at a predetermined time, with anonymous ‘doctors’ whose credentials cannot be verified, where they might be set upon by a mob of angry believers like yourself.
You may imagine you might do this or that in such circumstances. Unless you have been there, and done that, perhaps you should be more considerate of the pressures these people may be under. They might be dying to show, to prove their innocence, but feel paralysed, unable to do so.
Do you not think it is a coincidence that Abraham has previous convictions for child abuse (imagine how many times he abused children before he actually got a conviction!), that he heard an interview describing groin tattoos on a high-profile paedophile (Leon Brittan), and so on? More coincidence? Do you not see how he was trying to impress his new love, to ‘help her’ in her wish to annihilate her ex? Love is such a strange thing, don’t you agree? Of course, that bit was but a tiny part of this whole mélange of various contributory factors that came together to make this stranger-than-strange case. Lots and lots of hatred was the bulk of it though. That, and questionable reading habits.
I believe all of what the children said emanated from the mind of Abraham. The children filled in the details as best they could for him, as required, in survival mode. Abraham, to the children: “If you’re crying, you’re lying”. Think about that.