Police tell Hampstead ‘researcher’ to stop downloading child porn

Over on her on-again, off-again sometimes-blog, sometimes-private website, Charlotte Ward has been frothing at the mouth since the CEOP (Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre) sent a Hampstead “researcher” a politely worded note telling him or her to please stop visiting child porn sites and sending them the results.

http://www.hampsteadresearch.com/2015/08/29/hampstead-activist-threatened/

Hampstead child porn researcher

My, my. I wonder which Hoaxteader was the recipient of this little missive? Couldn’t possibly be Charlotte herself, who has not only visited kiddy porn sites, but downloaded and published the results on her ill-fated earlier blog?

In any case, trust our Charlotte to bitch and moan about receiving a letter explaining how much trouble the “researcher” could get him or herself into. Heaven forbid she should simply read the advice and take it as a word to the wise. (Shurely you jest! —Editor)

picard-seriously

25 thoughts on “Police tell Hampstead ‘researcher’ to stop downloading child porn

  1. I’m so glad that EC picked up on this while I was away, as there’s a related point that’s been bugging me for days. Correct me if I’m wrong but is this Charlotte actually admitting to accessing and viewing child porn online?:

    http://www.hampsteadresearch.com/2015/08/29/hr-has-child-sex-abuse-site-shut-down

    And it’s particularly ironic in light of her usual unsubstantiated, desperate lies about us viewing child porn. I would say I’ve lost sleep over that but a cursory glance at Charlotte’s Hampstead Research bog – sorry, blog – reveals that not only is it even less credible than it was (there’s some bollocks about ley lines, a fake “confession” by Ricky Dearman, several re-posts, two painfully unfunny cartoons and a rather long piece which she’s plagiarised from someone else) but you’ll also notice that in the last ten posts, there is only one comment. And that’s someone vehemently disagreeing with her! And that someone is Lndy B, one of Charlotte’s former allies. So even her own team don’t give a shite about anything she has to say any more. Nice😄

    The Crimson Ladle

    Liked by 1 person

    • Yes, it certainly seems that she has looked at those sites. Frankly, I wouldn’t even know where to start to find a site like that.

      I have a friend who had an admin role as a civilian with people whose job it is to view and classify those images for things like prosecuting and investigation. People burn out pretty quickly apparently, and if they don’t there’s questions asked. Those children have names. The police know who some of them are but years after the abuse the images are still circulating, available, being viewed. Everyone, including my friend, had to have regular mandatory counselling with a specialist. The term they use for the images is not child pornography, but images of child sex abuse. That’s really to drive home the point that children are exploited and abused to make the images, most of them anyway. Some can be stolen innocent family snaps.

      Brian Pead, who was convicted and sentenced for trying to meet a child for sex who he groomed online, says it was just for research. The “child” turned out to be a police officer.

      http://www.newsshopper.co.uk/news/4886460.SIDCUP__Child_sex_offender_escapes_jail/

      Belinda’s posted again. Among other things she mentions Brian Pead right in the first paragraph of her most recent post.

      https://belindammckenzie.wordpress.com

      Whoever wrote that email is right, I’ve read lots of cases over the years where the defendant says it was “research”.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Wow OK, so we have Belinda actually stating she’s in support of a convicted child sex offender. You may remember she also had Terence Ewing listed as Advisor on her Association of McKenzie Friends website, a man who had two business partners that are convicted paedophiles; Keith Hammerton and Roger Gleaves. You also have Charlotte Ward and friends cruising child exploitation sites on TOR and downloading and distributing images. Not to mention Abe and his penchant for violence against minors.
        I find the psychological use of the term “Projection” very apt when it comes to this shady bunch.

        Liked by 1 person

  2. Quite handy that she keeps removing and reinstating her blog. It’s riddled with outrageous actionable libels but plaintiffs have a time limit to take legal action.
    Putting it behind a wall and then making it visible again is regarded as re-publishing,
    Seeking out child porn ?..sick sick sick.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Sam, did you also see that there’s an odd comment from her about how her victims have reported her to Web Sheriff but “not to any real lawyers”. She seems blissfully unaware that she has actually been reported to the Police (her offences are criminal, not only civil) and that they are actually after her. The bitch also seems blissfully ignorant of the fact that suing her would require her real name and location, something she has tried desperately – but failed spectacularly – to conceal. It’s only a matter of time now before she and Jacco “Video Man” de Boer are arrested, charged and slung in jail.

      Liked by 1 person

  3. By the way, I know this is an old one but in light of Charlotte “Jacqui Farmer” Ward’s unsourced $20 billion figure cited above and her unsubstantiated accusations about us viewing child porn and about random Hampstead residents having made a fortune out of it, it seems rather apt:

    Liked by 1 person

    • What a leap of logic that the child porn business is worth $20B which means some pornographers could afford to live in Hampstead which is ..errr.. where Ella was living for a fair time

      Liked by 2 people

  4. Reading that wacky website a little nugget is revealed : Ella sent her 3 children to the Tavistock Institute for psychiatric counseling !!
    But according to web fanatics the Tavistock is the world-wide centre of Mind Control
    Curiouser & curiouser.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. This POS, “Charlotte”, needs to grab a brain-cell! Not only is the CEOP absolutely right in warning her about the legal consequences, how could she possibly not understand that every time she views a child sexual abuse image, she RE-VICTIMIZES the person depicted in it! It doesn’t matter, whether her intention is to “get off” on it or not – the person is still re-victimized by her viewing the image.

    Furthermore, the vast majority of CSA images that someone could find through a non-payment access website will be “historic”, which is to say they will be at least 10 years old. Many thousands of images were produced in the 1960’s, 1970’s or 1980’s, but an idiot like this won’t be able to tell the difference. While persons posting such images online should still be reported, the police are more interested in CURRENT images, i.e.,they could rescue a victim who is still a child and still being abused today.

    This is an issue that I take very personally, (and that’s all I will say about that), and I’m also in contact with half-a-dozen historic CSA victims from 1970’s commercial CSA. The “sally series” legal case in the US has established their right to SUE THE SH*T out of anyone who possesses, reproduces, transmits or displays any image taken from their victimization, even if it is “cropped” or the face is obscured. “Charlotte”, Chris Fay-gin and Bill Baloney need to F.O. with “researching” CSA images. You are not cops, and only cops have the right to view these images, in the course of their duties.

    Liked by 1 person

    • pretty creepy she/he found child porn sites. I cannot imagine it’s easy and what’s the bet CEOP have passed on details to the cops who investigate, Talk about dicing with danger.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Very well said indeed, Justin. Charlotte and her crew seem to have no clue about the concept of revictimisation (well, no clue about much of anything, really), but anyone who’s had any experience of child sexual abuse, whether as a victim, a support-giver, or a law enforcer, know all too well the horror of the situation.

      Like

  6. I notice Charlotte’s latest site has a page on Jehovah’s Witnesses. Having had a go at Jews and gays I wonder if she will go full Nazi and put up a page about Gypsies next.

    Liked by 1 person

  7. Pingback: Charlotte Ward admits to viewing commercial child sexual abuse site | HOAXTEAD RESEARCH

  8. Pingback: CEOP says get lost; Hoaxteader weeps tears of rage | HOAXTEAD RESEARCH

  9. Pingback: The tired old ‘child porn’ myth debunked…again | HOAXTEAD RESEARCH

Comments are closed.