Musings on Dr. Hodes’ Discredited Medical Report

*READER DISCRETION ADVISED*

(This makes uncomfortable reading in places.)


First, some thoughts from our regular contributors (to whom we’re extremely grateful), who were responding to a rather persistent troll (and being significantly more polite than s/he was):

1


2b

http://www.nhs.uk/conditions/Anal-fissure/Pages/Introduction.aspx


3b

http://www.theguardian.com/society/2011/jul/17/the-rape-of-men


4


99a

99b3


From Mrs. Justice Pauffley’s fact-finding report:

132


133-134


135-136


137-138


139

https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/gareeva-dearman-2015.pdf

http://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup.cgi?doc=/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2015/26.html&query=ZC14C00315&method=Boolean


See also:

https://hoaxteadresearch.wordpress.com/2015/05/31/the-medical-report-qa

https://hoaxteadresearch.wordpress.com/evidence

https://hoaxteadresearch.wordpress.com/2015/05/04/court-hearing-report

http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/103/5/980.abstract

https://hoaxteadresearch.wordpress.com/2015/08/21/guidance-2222-exposes-kgb-agent-lmao/#comments

Advertisements

14 thoughts on “Musings on Dr. Hodes’ Discredited Medical Report

  1. Yes. The Needleblog published excerpts from the coroner’s report on the corpse of the unfortunate child rape & murder victim Jason Swift. It’s horrible of course, and traumatizing to read and maybe not suitable for public consumption. But it was very graphic about the extent of the injuries inflicted by only one night of being gang-raped. People here don’t need to be told what that means.

    It is obscenely disrespectful to the memory of Jason Swift and other child victims of anal rape, for anyone to pretend to believe such horrific abuse as the Hoaxtead children described would result in “only” the physical reality stated in this case’s medical reports.

    Liked by 1 person

      • He couldn’t answer my question either, as to his evidence for historic anal abuse. His entire question’s invalid, LOL.

        Like

      • I think your question is an excellent one, but I wouldn’t hold my breath waiting for the hoaxers to answer it. Just as they can cherry-pick evidence that suits their agenda, they feel perfectly justified in cherry-picking victims. If the older boy was not sufficiently easy to bully into compliance, he would have been of no use to them.

        Liked by 1 person

    • What’s this above?? The Helpful Troll always seemed to be a pleasant individual. Why are they now banging on about “historic anal damage?”

      Liked by 1 person

      • THT keeps asking that question for no other reason than as a pathetic attempt to troll us. His question has been answered several times by several people, despite his rudeness and despite the question being invalid. He’s the only one claiming historic abuse – not even his fellow Hoaxteaders have claimed that, which is why he’s been completely unable to provide a link to any evidence to support his claim. He’s basically completely made that up for the purposes of trolling. I wouldn’t waste my time on this idiot.

        Like

  2. Pingback: Who is really trying to control the Hoaxtead narrative? | HOAXTEAD RESEARCH

Comments are closed.